ArticleBMC health services research2015
Shared decision making in designing new healthcare environments-time to begin improving quality.
Article in BMC health services research, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 20 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
20 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.
- A Systematic Review of Research Gaps in the Built Environment of Inpatient Healthcare Settings.HERD · 2024Pooled it
- Interventions for promoting participation in shared decision-making for children and adolescents with cystic fibrosis.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2019Pooled it
- Randomised trials comparing different healthcare settings: an exploratory review of the impact of pre-trial preferences on participation, and discussion of other methodological challenges.BMC health services research · 2016Pooled it
- Advancing Clinical Competence Through Interprofessional Education: Perspectives and Experiences of Healthcare Professionals and Clinical Educators.Nursing reports (Pavia, Italy) · 2026Article
- Beyond Satisfaction: Person-Centred Care and the Physical Environment Revisited-An Integrative Review.Nursing open · 2026Review
- "We Do Not Seem to Have Geriatric Wards": A Qualitative Analysis of Gaps in Healthcare Access Among Older Patients in Addis Ababa, Ethiopia.Health science reports · 2025Article
- Perceived Penalties for Sharing Patient Beliefs with Health Care Providers.Medical decision making : an international journal of the Society for Medical Decision Making · 2024Article
- The Impact of Shared Decision-Making on the Quality of Decision Making in Aortic Dissection: A before-and-after Comparison Study.Reviews in cardiovascular medicine · 2023Article
- Why hospital design matters: A narrative review of built environments research relevant to stroke care.International journal of stroke : official journal of the International Stroke Society · 2022Review
- The Swedish Health Promoting Healthcare network and the built environment.Health promotion international · 2022Article
- Does the physical environment matter? - A qualitative study of healthcare professionals' experiences of newly built stroke units.International journal of qualitative studies on health and well-being · 2021Article
- Article
- Health consumer engagement in developing novel preventive health community pharmacy roles in cardiovascular disease in Saudi Arabia: A qualitative analysis.Saudi pharmaceutical journal : SPJ : the official publication of the Saudi Pharmaceutical Society · 2020Article
- The built environment and its impact on health outcomes and experiences of patients, significant others and staff-A protocol for a systematic review.Nursing open · 2020Article
- The Importance of the Built Environment in Person-Centred Rehabilitation at Home: Study Protocol.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2019Article
- A stakeholder co-design approach for developing a community pharmacy service to enhance screening and management of atrial fibrillation.BMC health services research · 2018Article
- Healthcare Quality: A Concept Analysis.Nursing forum · 2017Article
- Article
- eHealth for Patient Engagement: A Systematic Review.Frontiers in psychology · 2015Review
- A Study of Self-Care Practice in Routine Radiotherapy Care: Identifying Differences Between Practitioners and Non-Practitioners in Sociodemographic, Clinical, Functional, and Quality-of-Life-Related Characteristics.Integrative cancer therapiesArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundSuccessful implementation of new methods and models of healthcare to achieve better patient outcomes and safe, person-centered care is dependent on the physical environment of the healthcare architecture in which the healthcare is provided. Thus, decisions concerning healthcare architecture are critical because it affects people and work processes for many years and requires a long-term financial commitment from society. In this paper, we describe and suggest several strategies (critical factors) to promote shared-decision making when planning and designing new healthcare environments. DISCUSSION: This paper discusses challenges and hindrances observed in the literature and from the authors extensive experiences in the field of planning and designing healthcare environments. An overview is presented of the challenges and new approaches for a process that involves the mutual exchange of knowledge among various stakeholders. Additionally, design approaches that balance the influence of specific and local requirements with general knowledge and evidence that should be encouraged are discussed. We suggest a shared-decision making and collaborative planning and design process between representatives from healthcare, construction sector and architecture based on evidence and end-users' perspectives. If carefully and systematically applied, this approach will support and develop a framework for creating high quality healthcare environments.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.