Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25888868›Full record

ArticleBMC research notes2015

Smoking in school-aged adolescents: design of a social network survey in six European countries.

Vincent Lorant, Victoria Eugenia Soto, Joana Alves, Bruno Federico, Jaana Kinnunen, Mirte Kuipers, Irene Moor, Julian Perelman, Matthias Richter, Arja Rimpelä and 3 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC research notes, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 23 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
23citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
2.5field-weighted citation impact, top 11% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

23 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 56 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Electronic cigarette use among 14- to 17-year-olds in Europe.European journal of public health · 2021
    Article
  7. [The association between school tobacco policies and the perceived smoking prevalence of adolescents].Bundesgesundheitsblatt, Gesundheitsforschung, Gesundheitsschutz · 2021
    Article
  8. Article
  9. Youth Access to Cigarettes Across Seven European Countries: A Mixed-Methods Study.Nicotine & tobacco research : official journal of the Society for Research on Nicotine and Tobacco · 2020
    Article
  10. The Association Between Smoke-Free School Policies and Adolescents' Perceived Antismoking Norms: Moderation by School Connectedness.Nicotine & tobacco research : official journal of the Society for Research on Nicotine and Tobacco · 2020
    Article
  11. Article
  12. Economic Evaluation of Five Tobacco Control Policies Across Seven European Countries.Nicotine & tobacco research : official journal of the Society for Research on Nicotine and Tobacco · 2020
    Article
  13. Academic Well-Being and Structural Characteristics of Peer Networks in School.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2020
    Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

13 authors at 7 institutions in 6 countries.

Vincent LorantInstitute of Health and Society, Université Catholique de Louvain (UCL), Clos chapelle aux champs 30.05, 1200, Brussels, Belgium. vincent.lorant@uclouvain.be.
Victoria Eugenia SotoInstitute of Health and Society, Université Catholique de Louvain (UCL), Clos chapelle aux champs 30.05, 1200, Brussels, Belgium. victoria.sotorojas@uclouvain.be.
Joana AlvesEscola Nacional de Saúde Pública, Universidade Nova de Lisboa, Lisbon, Portugal. joana.alves@ensp.unl.pt.
Bruno FedericoDepartment of Human Sciences, Society and Health, University of Cassino and Southern Lazio, Cassino, Italy. b.federico@unicas.it.
Jaana KinnunenSchool of Health Sciences, University of Tampere, Tampere, Finland. Jaana.M.Kinnunen@uta.fi.
Mirte KuipersDepartment of Public Health, Academic Medical Center, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands. m.a.kuipers@amc.uva.nl.
Irene MoorInstitute of Medical Sociology, Martin-Luther University of Halle, Halle, Germany. irene.moor@medizin.uni-halle.de.
Julian PerelmanEscola Nacional de Saúde Pública, Universidade Nova de Lisboa, Lisbon, Portugal. JPerelman@ensp.unl.pt.
Matthias RichterInstitute of Medical Sociology, Martin-Luther University of Halle, Halle, Germany. m.richter@medizin.uni-halle.de.
Arja RimpeläSchool of Health Sciences, University of Tampere, Tampere, Finland. Arja.Rimpela@uta.fi.
Pierre-Olivier RobertInstitute of Health and Society, Université Catholique de Louvain (UCL), Clos chapelle aux champs 30.05, 1200, Brussels, Belgium. pierre-olivier.robert@uclouvain.be.
Gaetano RoscilloDepartment of Human Sciences, Society and Health, University of Cassino and Southern Lazio, Cassino, Italy. g.roscillo@unicas.it.
Anton KunstDepartment of Public Health, Academic Medical Center, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands. A.Kunst@amc.uva.nl.
UCLouvain · BEMartin Luther University Halle-Wittenberg · DEUniversidade Nova de Lisboa · PTUniversità degli studi di Cassino e del Lazio Meridionale · ITUniversity of Amsterdam · NLTampere University · FITampere University · FI

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundIn Western countries, smoking accounts for a large share of socio-economic inequalities in health. As smoking initiation occurs around the age of 13, it is likely that school context and social networks at school play a role in the origin of such inequalities. So far, there has been little generic explanation of how social ties at school contribute to socio-economic inequalities in smoking. The SILNE (Smoking Inequalities - Learning from Natural Experiments) survey was designed to test the hypothesis that a combination of peer effect, homophilous social ties, and school context may explain how smoking inequalities are magnified at school - a theory known as network-induced inequality. In this paper, the survey theory and design are presented.

findingsThe social network survey was carried out in 2013 in six medium-sized European cities with average incomes similar to the national average: Namur (Belgium), Tampere (Finland), Hannover (Germany), Latina (Italy), Amersfoort (The Netherlands), and Coimbra (Portugal). In each city, 6 to 8 schools were selected in a stratified sampling procedure. In each school, two grades in secondary education, corresponding to 14-16-year-olds, were selected. All adolescents in these two grades were invited to participate in the survey. Social ties were reported using the roster approach, in which each adolescent had to nominate up to 5 friends from a directory. The survey collected information from 11,015 adolescents in 50 schools, out of a total of 13,870 registered adolescents, yielding a participation rate of 79%. The SILNE survey yielded 57,094 social ties, 86.7% of which referred to friends who also participated in the survey. DISCUSSION: The SILNE survey was designed to measure the association between adolescents' social ties at school, their socio-economic background, and their smoking behaviour. Two difficulties were encountered, however: legal privacy constraints made it impossible to apply the same parental consent procedure in all countries, leading to somewhat lower participation rates in two cities: Hannover and Latina. It was also difficult to match the 6 cities in terms of both age and type of education. The SILNE survey provided a comparable database for the study of smoking inequalities across European cities from a social network perspective.

Indexed as

Social SupportAdolescentAdolescent BehaviorEuropeHumansSmokingSocioeconomic FactorsSurveys and Questionnaires

Identifiers

PMID25888868
PMCPMC4381513
OpenAlexW2066628336

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.