Trial reportThe international journal of behavioral nutrition and physical activity2015
Employers' views of promoting walking to work: a qualitative study.
Trial report in The international journal of behavioral nutrition and physical activity, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 16 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
16 citing papers in PubMed, 46 citations in OpenAlex.
- Socio-Ecological Natural Experiment with Randomized Controlled Trial to Promote Active Commuting to Work: Process Evaluation, Behavioral Impacts, and Changes in the Use and Quality of Walking and Cycling Paths.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2019Trial
- Evaluation of an intervention to promote walking during the commute to work: a cluster randomised controlled trial.BMC public health · 2019Trial
- Scoping review of public attitudes to government active travel interventions in the UK.BMJ open · 2026Article
- Analyzing determinants from both compositional and contextual level impeding desired linear growth of children in Indian context.BMC nutrition · 2023Article
- Home care nurses' perception of the challenges they faced during the COVID-19 pandemic: a qualitative study.BMC nursing · 2022Article
- Article
- Risk factors for caesarean delivery and fetal macrosomia among women with gestational diabetes in Nyeri County, Kenya: a cross-section study.The Pan African medical journal · 2022Article
- Factors predicting readmission in patients with COVID-19.BMC research notes · 2021Article
- Value of ultrasound elastography combined with contrast-enhanced ultrasound and micro-flow imaging in differential diagnosis of benign and malignant breast lesions.American journal of translational research · 2021Article
- Associations of mode of travel to work with physical activity, and individual, interpersonal, organisational, and environmental characteristics.Journal of transport & health · 2018Article
- Population levels of, and inequalities in, active travel: A national, cross-sectional study of adults in Scotland.Preventive medicine reports · 2017Article
- What Is Driving Obesity? A Review on the Connections Between Obesity and Motorized Transportation.Current obesity reports · 2017Review
- The impact of firms' adjustments on the indirect cost of illness.International journal of health economics and management · 2017Article
- Team Sport in the Workplace? A RE-AIM Process Evaluation of 'Changing the Game'.AIMS public health · 2017Article
- What are the Facilitators and Obstacles to Participation in Workplace Team Sport? A Qualitative Study.AIMS public health · 2017Article
- Employers' views on the promotion of workplace health and wellbeing: a qualitative study.BMC public health · 2015Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundPhysical inactivity increases the risk of many chronic diseases including coronary heart disease, type 2 diabetes, obesity and some cancers. It is currently recommended that adults should undertake at least 150 minutes of moderate physical activity in bouts of 10 minutes or more throughout the week. One way for adults in employment to incorporate exercise into their daily routine is to walk during the commute to and from work. Schemes to promote active travel require the support of employers and managers but there is a lack of research focusing on their views and experiences of promoting walk to work schemes.
methodsThis study presents the findings from in-depth, digitally recorded interviews with 29 employers from a range of small, medium and large workplaces who participated in a feasibility study to develop and test an employer-led scheme to promote walking to work. All recordings were fully transcribed. The Framework approach for data management was used to aid qualitative analysis. Interview transcripts were read and reread, and textual data were placed in charts focusing on facilitators, barriers, and possibilities for employers to promote walking to work.
resultsA range of perspectives were identified, from active support through uncertainty and cynicism to resistance. The majority of employers who took part in the study were unclear about how to give practical support for employees who walk to work, but appeared more confident about ideas to promote cycling. Some employers were concerned about how their attempts to promote walking might be perceived by employees. Furthermore, the main business of their organisation took priority over other activities.
conclusionsIt is clear that employers need more evidence of the effectiveness of walk to work schemes, and the benefits to employers of committing resources to them. Furthermore, employers need support in creating an authentic, health promoting ethos within the workplace to enhance positive relationships and reduce tensions that may arise when promoting active travel initiatives.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.