Trial reportTrials2015
RandomizEd controlled trial for pre-operAtive dose-escaLation BOOST in locally advanced rectal cancer (RECTAL BOOST study): study protocol for a randomized controlled trial.
Trial report in Trials, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT01951521 (RandomizEd Controlled Trial for Pre-operAtive Dose-escaLation BOOST in Locally Advanced Rectal Cancer), which is not on this map. Cited by 33 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
RandomizEd Controlled Trial for Pre-operAtive Dose-escaLation BOOST in Locally Advanced Rectal Cancer
Who cites it
33 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 68 citations in OpenAlex.
- A systematic review of omics discovery studies to identify pertinent metabolic pathways for locally advanced rectal cancer in response to neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy.Metabolomics : Official journal of the Metabolomic Society · 2025Pooled it
- Pathological Complete Response Following Different Neoadjuvant Treatment Strategies for Locally Advanced Rectal Cancer: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.Annals of surgical oncology · 2020Pooled it
- Microscopic intramural extension of rectal cancer after neoadjuvant chemoradiation: A meta-analysis based on individual patient data.Radiotherapy and oncology : journal of the European Society for Therapeutic Radiology and Oncology · 2020Pooled it
- Trial
- PROState Pathway Embedded Comparative Trial: The IP3-PROSPECT study.Contemporary clinical trials · 2021Trial
- [Time interval between neoadjuvant radiochemotherapy and surgery in rectal cancer : No impact on the pathologic complete response rate?]Strahlentherapie und Onkologie : Organ der Deutschen Rontgengesellschaft ... [et al] · 2017Trial
- Trial
- Trial
- Determining optimal GTV-to-PGTV margins for CT-guided dose-escalated radiotherapy with daily image guidance in locally advanced rectal cancer.Journal of applied clinical medical physics · 2026Article
- Investigation of changes in planning target volume and regression probability of rectal boost using in-silico cone-beam computed tomography-guided online-adaptive radiotherapy.Physics and imaging in radiation oncology · 2025Article
- On the trail of CBCT-guided adaptive rectal boost radiotherapy, does daily delineation require a radiation oncologist?Technical innovations & patient support in radiation oncology · 2024Article
- Measurement of the distance between tumor micro-foci and gross tumor in rectal cancer pathological specimens: implication on margin distance of clinical target volume treated with high-dose radiotherapy for rectal cancer.International journal of clinical oncology · 2024Article
- Randomised trials conducted using cohorts: a scoping review.BMJ open · 2024Article
- Results of a diagnostic imaging audit in a randomised clinical trial in rectal cancer highlight the importance of careful planning and quality control.Insights into imaging · 2023Review
- The Trial within Cohorts (TwiCs) study design in oncology: experience and methodological reflections.BMC medical research methodology · 2023Article
- Mesorectal motion evaluation in rectal cancer MR-guided radiotherapy: an exploratory study to quantify treatment margins.Radiation oncology (London, England) · 2023Article
- From "East vs West" towards international multidisciplinary collaboration: An appraisal of lateral lymph nodes in rectal cancer.Annals of gastroenterological surgery · 2021Review
- CONSORT extension for the reporting of randomised controlled trials conducted using cohorts and routinely collected data (CONSORT-ROUTINE): checklist with explanation and elaboration.BMJ (Clinical research ed.) · 2021Article
- Cone-beam computed tomography for organ motion evaluation in locally advanced rectal cancer patients.La Radiologia medica · 2021Article
- MR-Guided Radiotherapy for Rectal Cancer: Current Perspective on Organ Preservation.Frontiers in oncology · 2021Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
11 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundTreatment for locally advanced rectal cancer (LARC) consists of chemoradiation therapy (CRT) and surgery. Approximately 15% of patients show a pathological complete response (pCR). Increased pCR-rates can be achieved through dose escalation, thereby increasing the number patients eligible for organ-preservation to improve quality of life (QoL). A randomized comparison of 65 versus 50Gy with external-beam radiation alone has not yet been performed. This trial investigates pCR rate, clinical response, toxicity, QoL and (disease-free) survival in LARC patients treated with 65Gy (boost + chemoradiation) compared with 50Gy standard chemoradiation (sCRT). METHODS/
designThis study follows the 'cohort multiple randomized controlled trial' (cmRCT) design: rectal cancer patients are included in a prospective cohort that registers clinical baseline, follow-up, survival and QoL data. At enrollment, patients are asked consent to offer them experimental interventions in the future. Eligible patients-histologically confirmed LARC (T3NxM0 <1 mm from mesorectal fascia, T4NxM0 or TxN2M0) located ≤10 cm from the anorectal transition who provided consent for experimental intervention offers-form a subcohort (n = 120). From this subcohort, a random sample is offered the boost prior to sCRT (n = 60), which they may accept or refuse. Informed consent is signed only after acceptance of the boost. Non-selected patients in the subcohort (n = 60) undergo sCRT alone and are not notified that they participate in the control arm until the trial is completed. sCRT consists of 50Gy (25 × 2Gy) with concomitant capecitabine. The boost (without chemotherapy) is given prior to sCRT and consists of 15 Gy (5 × 3Gy) delivered to the gross tumor volume (GTV). The primary endpoint is pCR (TRG 1). Secondary endpoints include acute grade 3-4 toxicity, good pathologic response (TRG 1-2), clinical response, surgical complications, QoL and (disease-free) survival. Data is analyzed by intention to treat. DISCUSSION: The boost is delivered prior to sCRT so that GTV adjustment for tumor shrinkage during sCRT is not necessary. Small margins also aim to limit irradiation of healthy tissue. The cmRCT design provides opportunity to overcome common shortcomings of classic RCTs, such as slow recruitment, disappointment-bias in control arm patients and poor generalizability.
trial registrationThe Netherlands Trials Register NL46051.041.13. Registered 22 August 2013. ClinicalTrials.gov NCT01951521 . Registered 18 September 2013.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.