Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25888517›Full record

ArticleBMC evolutionary biology2015

A comprehensive analysis of teleost MHC class I sequences.

Unni Grimholt, Kentaro Tsukamoto, Teruo Azuma, Jong Leong, Ben F Koop, Johannes M Dijkstra

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC evolutionary biology, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 54 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
54citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

54 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Atlantic cod (Frontiers in cell and developmental biology · 2023
    Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Review
  18. Discovery of an ancient MHC category with both class I and class II features.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2021
    Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Unni GrimholtSoeren Jaabaeksgate 10B, 0460, Oslo, Norway. Unni.Grimholt@gmail.com.
Kentaro TsukamotoInstitute for Comprehensive Medical Science, Fujita Health University, Toyoake, Aichi, 470-1192, Japan. k-tsuka@fujita-hu.ac.jp.
Teruo AzumaFisheries Technology Division, National Research Institute of Fisheries Engineering, 7620-7, Hasaki, Kamisu-shi, Ibaraki, Japan. azuma@affrc.go.jp.
Jong LeongCentre for Biomedical Research, Department of Biology, University of Victoria, PO Box 3020 STN CSC, Victoria, Canada. jong@uvic.ca.
Ben F KoopCentre for Biomedical Research, Department of Biology, University of Victoria, PO Box 3020 STN CSC, Victoria, Canada. bkoop@uvic.ca.
Johannes M DijkstraInstitute for Comprehensive Medical Science, Fujita Health University, Toyoake, Aichi, 470-1192, Japan. dijkstra@fujita-hu.ac.jp.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundMHC class I (MHCI) molecules are the key presenters of peptides generated through the intracellular pathway to CD8-positive T-cells. In fish, MHCI genes were first identified in the early 1990's, but we still know little about their functional relevance. The expansion and presumed sub-functionalization of cod MHCI and access to many published fish genome sequences provide us with the incentive to undertake a comprehensive study of deduced teleost fish MHCI molecules.

resultsWe expand the known MHCI lineages in teleosts to five with identification of a new lineage defined as P. The two lineages U and Z, which both include presumed peptide binding classical/typical molecules besides more derived molecules, are present in all teleosts analyzed. The U lineage displays two modes of evolution, most pronouncedly observed in classical-type alpha 1 domains; cod and stickleback have expanded on one of at least eight ancient alpha 1 domain lineages as opposed to many other teleosts that preserved a number of these ancient lineages. The Z lineage comes in a typical format present in all analyzed ray-finned fish species as well as lungfish. The typical Z format displays an unprecedented conservation of almost all 37 residues predicted to make up the peptide binding groove. However, also co-existing atypical Z sub-lineage molecules, which lost the presumed peptide binding motif, are found in some fish like carps and cavefish. The remaining three lineages, L, S and P, are not predicted to bind peptides and are lost in some species.

conclusionsMuch like tetrapods, teleosts have polymorphic classical peptide binding MHCI molecules, a number of classical-similar non-classical MHCI molecules, and some members of more diverged MHCI lineages. Different from tetrapods, however, is that in some teleosts the classical MHCI polymorphism incorporates multiple ancient MHCI domain lineages. Also different from tetrapods is that teleosts have typical Z molecules, in which the residues that presumably form the peptide binding groove have been almost completely conserved for over 400 million years. The reasons for the uniquely teleost evolution modes of peptide binding MHCI molecules remain an enigma.

Indexed as

Genes, MHC Class IAnimalsFishesHistocompatibility Antigens Class IPhylogenySequence Analysis, DNAHistocompatibility Antigens Class I

Identifiers

PMID25888517
PMCPMC4364491

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.