Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25888492›Full record

ArticleBMC genomics2015

Simple regression for correcting ΔCt bias in RT-qPCR low-density array data normalization.

Xiangqin Cui, Shaohua Yu, Ashutosh Tamhane, Zenoria L Causey, Adam Steg, Maria I Danila, Richard J Reynolds, Jinyi Wang, Keith C Wanzeck, Qi Tang and 4 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC genomics, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Replication Study:eLife · 2018
    Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Effect of BIO-PLYViruses · 2022
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

14 authors.

Xiangqin CuiDepartment of Biostatistics, School of Public Health, University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, AL, 35294, USA. xcui@uab.edu.
Shaohua YuDepartment of Biostatistics, School of Public Health, University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, AL, 35294, USA. yus@uab.edu.
Ashutosh TamhaneDepartment of Biostatistics, School of Public Health, University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, AL, 35294, USA. ATamhane@uab.edu.
Zenoria L CauseyDivision of Clinical Immunology and Rheumatology, University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, AL, 35294, USA. zcausey@uab.edu.
Adam StegDepartment of Pharmacology and Toxicology, University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, AL, 35294, USA. asteg@uab.edu.
Maria I DanilaDivision of Clinical Immunology and Rheumatology, University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, AL, 35294, USA. mdanila@uab.edu.
Richard J ReynoldsDepartment of Biostatistics, School of Public Health, University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, AL, 35294, USA. rjriv@uab.edu.
Jinyi WangDivision of Clinical Immunology and Rheumatology, University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, AL, 35294, USA. jinw@uab.edu.
Keith C WanzeckDivision of Clinical Immunology and Rheumatology, University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, AL, 35294, USA. kwanzeck@uab.edu.
Qi TangDivision of Clinical Immunology and Rheumatology, University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, AL, 35294, USA. tangqi@uab.edu.
Stephanie S LedbetterDivision of Clinical Immunology and Rheumatology, University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, AL, 35294, USA. sledbetter@uab.edu.
David T ReddenDepartment of Biostatistics, School of Public Health, University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, AL, 35294, USA. samndave@uab.edu.
Martin R JohnsonDepartment of Pharmacology and Toxicology, University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, AL, 35294, USA. martinjohnsonmrj@gmail.com.
S Louis BridgesDivision of Clinical Immunology and Rheumatology, University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, AL, 35294, USA. lbridges@uab.edu.

Funding

Sex Related Determinants Of Pain In FibromyalgiaP60AR048095 · NIAMS · UNIVERSITY OF ALABAMA AT BIRMINGHAM · PI REDDEN, DAVID T · 2002 to 2012
$11.7M
UAB Multidisciplinary Clinical Research CenterP60AR064172 · NIAMS · UNIVERSITY OF ALABAMA AT BIRMINGHAM · PI BRIDGES, S LOUIS · 2013 to 2018
$4.5M
Genome-Wide Association Study in African-Americans with Rheumatoid ArthritisR01AR057202 · NIAMS · UNIVERSITY OF ALABAMA AT BIRMINGHAM · PI BRIDGES, S LOUIS · 2009 to 2013
$4.2M
Genetic Architecture of Rheumatoid Arthritis in African-AmericansK23AR062100 · NIAMS · UNIVERSITY OF ALABAMA AT BIRMINGHAM · PI DANILA, MARIA IOANA · 2012 to 2016
$674k
Discovering Novel Genetic and Environmental Risk Factors for RA in African AmericK01AR060848 · NIAMS · UNIVERSITY OF ALABAMA AT BIRMINGHAM · PI REYNOLDS, RICHARD JAMES · 2011 to 2015
$641k
NIAMS NIH HHS K01 AR060848NIAMS NIH HHS K23 AR062100NIAMS NIH HHS N01 AR-6-2278NIAMS NIH HHS P60 AR048095NIAMS NIH HHS P60 AR064172NIAMS NIH HHS R01 AR057202
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundReverse transcription quantitative PCR (RT-qPCR) is considered the gold standard for quantifying relative gene expression. Normalization of RT-qPCR data is commonly achieved by subtracting the Ct values of the internal reference genes from the Ct values of the target genes to obtain ΔCt. ΔCt values are then used to derive ΔΔCt when compared to a control group or to conduct further statistical analysis.

resultsWe examined two rheumatoid arthritis RT-qPCR low density array datasets and found that this normalization method introduces substantial bias due to differences in PCR amplification efficiency among genes. This bias results in undesirable correlations between target genes and reference genes, which affect the estimation of fold changes and the tests for differentially expressed genes. Similar biases were also found in multiple public mRNA and miRNA RT-qPCR array datasets we analysed. We propose to regress the Ct values of the target genes onto those of the reference genes to obtain regression coefficients, which are then used to adjust the reference gene Ct values before calculating ΔCt.

conclusionsThe per-gene regression method effectively removes the ΔCt bias. This method can be applied to both low density RT-qPCR arrays and individual RT-qPCR assays.

Indexed as

Oligonucleotide Array Sequence AnalysisArthritis, RheumatoidGene Expression ProfilingHumansMicroRNAsReference StandardsRegression AnalysisReverse Transcriptase Polymerase Chain ReactionRNA, MessengerMicroRNAsRNA, Messenger

Identifiers

PMID25888492
PMCPMC4335788

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.