Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25888283›Full record

ArticleMolecular systems biology2015

Differential genetic interactions of yeast stress response MAPK pathways.

Humberto Martin, Michael Shales, Pablo Fernandez-Piñar, Ping Wei, Maria Molina, Dorothea Fiedler, Kevan M Shokat, Pedro Beltrao, Wendell Lim, Nevan J Krogan

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Molecular systems biology, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 28 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
28citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

28 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Oxidative stress response pathways in fungi.Cellular and molecular life sciences : CMLS · 2022
    Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Multiple Forms of Multifunctional Proteins in Health and Disease.Frontiers in cell and developmental biology · 2020
    Review
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Humberto MartinDepartamento de Microbiología II, Facultad de Farmacia, Universidad Complutense de Madrid and Instituto Ramón y Cajal de Investigaciones Sanitarias (IRYCIS), Madrid, Spain.
Michael ShalesDepartment of Cellular and Molecular Pharmacology, University of California, San Francisco, CA USA.
Pablo Fernandez-PiñarDepartamento de Microbiología II, Facultad de Farmacia, Universidad Complutense de Madrid and Instituto Ramón y Cajal de Investigaciones Sanitarias (IRYCIS), Madrid, Spain.
Ping WeiCenter for Quantitative Biology and Peking-Tsinghua Center for Life Sciences, Peking University, Beijing, China.
Maria MolinaDepartamento de Microbiología II, Facultad de Farmacia, Universidad Complutense de Madrid and Instituto Ramón y Cajal de Investigaciones Sanitarias (IRYCIS), Madrid, Spain.
Dorothea FiedlerDepartment of Chemistry, Princeton University, Princeton, NJ, USA.
Kevan M ShokatChemistry and Chemical Biology Graduate Program, University of California, San Francisco, CA, USA.
Pedro BeltraoEuropean Molecular Biology Laboratory, European Bioinformatics Institute, Cambridge, UK iBiMED and Department of Health Sciences, University of Aveiro, Aveiro, Portugal pbeltrao@ebi.ac.uk nevan.krogan@ucsf.edu.
Wendell LimDepartment of Cellular and Molecular Pharmacology, University of California, San Francisco, CA USA Howard Hughes Medical Institute, University of California, San Francisco, CA, USA Center for Systems and Synthetic Biology, University of California, San Francisco, CA, USA.
Nevan J KroganDepartment of Cellular and Molecular Pharmacology, University of California, San Francisco, CA USA Center for Systems and Synthetic Biology, University of California, San Francisco, CA, USA California Institute for Quantitative Biosciences, QB3, San Francisco, CA, USA J. David Gladstone Institutes, San Francisco, CA, USA pbeltrao@ebi.ac.uk nevan.krogan@ucsf.edu.

Funding

Virology CoreP30AI027763 · NIAID · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA, SAN FRANCISCO · PI MALLORY O JOHNSON · 1988 to 2026
$93.6M
Comparative Analysis of Genetic Interaction NetworksR01GM084279 · NIGMS · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA, SAN DIEGO · PI IDEKER, TREY, KROGAN, NEVAN J · 2008 to 2017
$3.9M
PROTEIN RECOGNITION IN SIGNAL TRANSDUCTIONR01GM055040 · NIGMS · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA, SAN FRANCISCO · PI LIM, WENDELL A · 1997 to 2015
$3.5M
Genetic Analysis of the Nucleosome and RNA Polymerase II: A Systems ApproachR01GM084448 · NIGMS · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA, SAN FRANCISCO · PI KROGAN, NEVAN J · 2008 to 2012
$2.3M
Physical and Genetic Interaction Landscape of the Tyrosine KinomeR01GM107671 · NIGMS · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA, SAN FRANCISCO · PI BANDYOPADHYAY, SOURAV · 2014 to 2017
$1.8M
Integrating computation and genetics to quantify specificity in protein networksR01GM098101 · NIGMS · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA, SAN FRANCISCO · PI KORTEMME, TANJA, KROGAN, NEVAN J · 2011 to 2014
$1.7M
NIAID NIH HHS P30 AI027763NIGMS NIH HHS GM084279NIGMS NIH HHS GM084448NIGMS NIH HHS GM098101NIGMS NIH HHS R01 GM055040NIGMS NIH HHS R01 GM084279NIGMS NIH HHS R01 GM084448NIGMS NIH HHS R01 GM098101NIGMS NIH HHS R01 GM107671
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Genetic interaction screens have been applied with great success in several organisms to study gene function and the genetic architecture of the cell. However, most studies have been performed under optimal growth conditions even though many functional interactions are known to occur under specific cellular conditions. In this study, we have performed a large-scale genetic interaction analysis in Saccharomyces cerevisiae involving approximately 49 × 1,200 double mutants in the presence of five different stress conditions, including osmotic, oxidative and cell wall-altering stresses. This resulted in the generation of a differential E-MAP (or dE-MAP) comprising over 250,000 measurements of conditional interactions. We found an extensive number of conditional genetic interactions that recapitulate known stress-specific functional associations. Furthermore, we have also uncovered previously unrecognized roles involving the phosphatase regulator Bud14, the histone methylation complex COMPASS and membrane trafficking complexes in modulating the cell wall integrity pathway. Finally, the osmotic stress differential genetic interactions showed enrichment for genes coding for proteins with conditional changes in phosphorylation but not for genes with conditional changes in gene expression. This suggests that conditional genetic interactions are a powerful tool to dissect the functional importance of the different response mechanisms of the cell.

Indexed as

Gene Regulatory NetworksGenes, FungalCell WallGene Expression Regulation, FungalMAP Kinase Signaling SystemMetabolic Networks and PathwaysMutationOsmotic PressureOxidative StressPlasmidsProtein TransportSaccharomyces cerevisiaeSaccharomyces cerevisiae ProteinsStress, PhysiologicalSaccharomyces cerevisiae Proteinscell wall integritygenetic interactionsosmotic shockstress response

Identifiers

PMID25888283
PMCPMC4422557

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.