Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25888181›Full record

SynthesisCritical care (London, England)2015

Incidence and outcome of inappropriate in-hospital empiric antibiotics for severe infection: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Kristel Marquet, An Liesenborgs, Jochen Bergs, Arthur Vleugels, Neree Claes

3 registry-linked trialsAbstract readMeta-AnalysisSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Critical care (London, England), 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to 3 registered trials, which are not on this map. Cited by 107 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
107citing papers in PubMed, 3 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT03344627 nacompletednot on this mapstarted 2017, after this paper: background citation

Clinical Outcome Study of High-dose Meropenem in Sepsis and Septic Shock Patients

TypeinterventionalSponsorMahidol UniversityRan2017 to 2018Enrolled76ConditionsSepsis, Septic Shock, Critical Illness, CarbapenemArmsMeropenem standard dose, Meropenem high dose
NCT05090475 nacompletednot on this mapstarted 2020, after this paper: background citation

Evaluating Hospital Educator-led Academic Detailing on Improving Antibiotic Prescribing in Primary Healthcare: a Feasibility Study

TypeinterventionalSponsorGeneral Hospital KoprivnicaRan2020 to 2022Enrolled16ConditionsUpper Respiratory Tract Infections, Acute Respiratory Tract Infection, Viral InfectionArmsAcademic detailing intervention
NCT07491419 narecruitingnot on this mapstarted 2026, after this paper: background citation

The Impact of Fast Antimicrobial Sensitivity Testing Tools on Stewardship Antibiotic and Clinical Outcome: a Randomized Clinical Trial Within an Adaptive Platform Trial for Patients With Bloodstream Infections

TypeinterventionalSponsorIstituto Clinico HumanitasRan2026 to 2028Enrolled400ConditionsBloodstream Infection, Gram-Negative Infections, Gram-Positive Infections, Bacteremia SepsisArmsDiagnostic Test: Rapid Antimicrobial Susceptibility Testing (R-AST) guided Stewardship, Standard of Care (SOC)
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

107 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Trial
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. ASP-COMPLEX: redefining antimicrobial stewardship to improve outcomes in high-risk patients with severe infections.Revista espanola de quimioterapia : publicacion oficial de la Sociedad Espanola de Quimioterapia · 2026
    Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Association Between Delayed Broad-Spectrum Gram-negative Antibiotics and Clinical Outcomes: How Much Does Getting It Right With Empiric Antibiotics Matter?Clinical infectious diseases : an official publication of the Infectious Diseases Society of America · 2025
    Article

47 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Kristel MarquetHasselt University, Faculty of Medicine and Life Sciences, Agoralaan, Building D, Room C53, Diepenbeek, BE3590, Belgium. kristel.marquet@uhasselt.be.
An LiesenborgsJessa Hospital, Stadsomvaart 11, Hasselt, BE3500, Belgium. an_liesenborgs@hotmail.com.
Jochen BergsHasselt University, Faculty of Business Economics, Agoralaan, Building D, Diepenbeek, BE3590, Belgium. jochen.bergs@uhasselt.be.
Arthur VleugelsHasselt University, Faculty of Medicine and Life Sciences, Agoralaan, Building D, Room C53, Diepenbeek, BE3590, Belgium. arthur.vleugels@med.kuleuven.ac.be.
Neree ClaesHasselt University, Faculty of Medicine and Life Sciences, Agoralaan, Building D, Room C53, Diepenbeek, BE3590, Belgium. neree.claes@uhasselt.be.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionThe aims of this study were to explore the incidence of in-hospital inappropriate empiric antibiotic use in patients with severe infection and to identify its relationship with patient outcomes.

methodsMedline (from 2004 to 2014) was systematically searched by using predefined inclusion criteria. Reference lists of retrieved articles were screened for additional relevant studies. The systematic review included original articles reporting a quantitative measure of the association between the use of (in)appropriate empiric antibiotics in patients with severe in-hospital infections and their outcomes. A meta-analysis, using a random-effects model, was conducted to quantify the effect on mortality by using risk ratios.

resultsIn total, 27 individual articles fulfilled the inclusion criteria. The percentage of inappropriate empiric antibiotic use ranged from 14.1% to 78.9% (Q1-Q3: 28.1% to 57.8%); 13 of 27 studies (48.1%) described an incidence of 50% or more. A meta-analysis for 30-day mortality and in-hospital mortality showed risk ratios of 0.71 (95% confidence interval 0.62 to 0.82) and 0.67 (95% confidence interval 0.56 to 0.80), respectively. Studies with outcome parameter 28-day and 60-day mortality reported significantly (P ≤0.02) higher mortality rates in patients receiving inappropriate antibiotics. Two studies assessed the total costs, which were significantly higher in both studies (P ≤0.01).

conclusionsThis systematic review with meta-analysis provides evidence that inappropriate use of empiric antibiotics increases 30-day and in-hospital mortality in patients with a severe infection.

Indexed as

HospitalizationInappropriate PrescribingAnti-Bacterial AgentsHospital CostsHospital MortalityHumansIncidenceInfectionsLength of StaySeverity of Illness IndexAnti-Bacterial Agents

Identifiers

PMID25888181
PMCPMC4358713

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.