Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25888076›Full record

ArticleGenetics, selection, evolution : GSE2015

Genome-wide QTL analysis of meat quality-related traits in a large F2 intercross between Landrace and Korean native pigs.

In-Cheol Cho, Chae-Kyoung Yoo, Jae-Bong Lee, Eun-Ji Jung, Sang-Hyun Han, Sung-Soo Lee, Moon-Suck Ko, Hyun-Tae Lim, Hee-Bok Park

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Genetics, selection, evolution : GSE, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 21 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
21citing papers in PubMed, 3 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

21 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

In-Cheol ChoSubtropical Animal Experiment Station, National Institute of Animal Science, Rural Development Administration, Jeju, 690-150, Korea. choic4753@korea.kr.
Chae-Kyoung YooDepartment of Animal Science, College of Agriculture and Life Sciences, Gyeongsang National University, Jinju, 660-701, Korea. yck1985@gnu.ac.kr.
Jae-Bong LeeDepartment of Animal Science, College of Agriculture and Life Sciences, Gyeongsang National University, Jinju, 660-701, Korea. bilf@gnu.ac.kr.
Eun-Ji JungDepartment of Animal Science, College of Agriculture and Life Sciences, Gyeongsang National University, Jinju, 660-701, Korea. ejjung@gnu.ac.kr.
Sang-Hyun HanSubtropical Animal Experiment Station, National Institute of Animal Science, Rural Development Administration, Jeju, 690-150, Korea. hansh04@naver.com.
Sung-Soo LeeSubtropical Animal Experiment Station, National Institute of Animal Science, Rural Development Administration, Jeju, 690-150, Korea. lee6470@korea.kr.
Moon-Suck KoSubtropical Animal Experiment Station, National Institute of Animal Science, Rural Development Administration, Jeju, 690-150, Korea. koms21c@korea.kr.
Hyun-Tae LimDepartment of Animal Science, College of Agriculture and Life Sciences, Gyeongsang National University, Jinju, 660-701, Korea. s_htim@gnu.ac.kr.
Hee-Bok ParkDepartment of Animal Science, College of Agriculture and Life Sciences, Gyeongsang National University, Jinju, 660-701, Korea. heebok.park@cnu.ac.kr.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundWe conducted a genome-wide linkage analysis to identify quantitative trait loci (QTL) that influence meat quality-related traits in a large F2 intercross between Landrace and Korean native pigs. Thirteen meat quality-related traits of the m. longissimus lumborum et thoracis were measured in more than 830 F2 progeny. All these animals were genotyped with 173 microsatellite markers located throughout the pig genome, and the GridQTL program based on the least squares regression model was used to perform the QTL analysis.

resultsWe identified 23 genome-wide significant QTL in eight chromosome regions (SSC1, 2, 6, 7, 9, 12, 13, and 16) (SSC for Sus Scrofa) and detected 51 suggestive QTL in the 17 chromosome regions. QTL that affect 10 meat quality traits were detected on SSC12 and were highly significant at the genome-wide level. In particular, the QTL with the largest effect affected crude fat percentage and explained 22.5% of the phenotypic variance (F-ratio = 278.0 under the additive model, nominal P = 5.5 × 10(-55)). Interestingly, the QTL on SSC12 that influenced meat quality traits showed an obvious trend for co-localization.

conclusionsOur results confirm several previously reported QTL. In addition, we identified novel QTL for meat quality traits, which together with the associated positional candidate genes improve the knowledge on the genetic structure that underlies genetic variation for meat quality traits in pigs.

Indexed as

Crosses, GeneticGenome-Wide Association StudyQuantitative Trait LociRed MeatAnimalsGenetic LinkageGenetic VariationGenotypeMicrosatellite RepeatsPhenotypeSus scrofa

Identifiers

PMID25888076
PMCPMC4336478

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.