Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25888071›Full record

ReviewCritical care (London, England)2015

Optimizing mean arterial pressure in septic shock: a critical reappraisal of the literature.

Marc Leone, Pierre Asfar, Peter Radermacher, Jean-Louis Vincent, Claude Martin

2 registry-linked trialsOpen access · goldAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Critical care (London, England), 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to 2 registered trials, which are not on this map. Cited by 70 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
70citing papers in PubMed, 3 pooled it
17.7field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT02519699 phase4completednot on this map

Microcirculation After MAP Increase in Septic Shock Patients With Previous Hypertension

TypeinterventionalSponsorFederal University of São PauloRan2013 to 2017Enrolled40ConditionsSeptic ShockArmsnorepinephrine
NCT05358912 phase4completednot on this mapstarted 2019, after this paper: background citation

Does Targeted Abdominal Perfusion Pressure Reduce Renal Injury and Mortality in Septic Shock Patients? A Prospective Controlled Trial

TypeinterventionalSponsorBozyaka Training and Research HospitalRan2019 to 2022Enrolled85ConditionsSeptic Shock, Septicemia, Intraabdominal Hypertension, Renal InjuryArmsVasopressor Agent, Crystalloid Solutions, Invasive Blood Pressure Monitoring, Intra-Abdominal Pressure Monitoring, Abdominal Perfusion Pressure
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

70 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 202 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Trial
  5. Review
  6. Observational
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. ManagingAntimicrobial agents and chemotherapy · 2025
    Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Acute Kidney Injury in Sepsis.International journal of molecular sciences · 2024
    Review
  16. Implementation and Evaluation of Weight-Based Vasopressors in Intensive Care Units.The Journal of pharmacy technology : jPT : official publication of the Association of Pharmacy Technicians · 2024
    Article
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article

10 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 4 institutions in 2 countries.

Marc LeoneService d'Anesthésie et de Réanimation, Chemin des Bourrely, Hôpital Nord, Assistance Publique-Hôpitaux de Marseille, Aix Marseille Université, 13015, Marseille, France. marc.leone@ap-hm.fr.
Pierre AsfarDépartement de Réanimation Médicale et de Médecine Hyperbare Centre Hospitalier Universitaire Angers; and Laboratoire de Biologie Neurovasculaire et Mitochondriale Intégrée, CNRS UMR 6214 - INSERM U1083, Université Angers, PRES L'UNAM, 4 Rue Larrey, 49100, Angers, France. PiAsfar@chu-angers.fr.
Peter RadermacherInstitut für Anästhesiologische Pathophysiologie und Verfahrensentwicklung, Universitätsklinikum, Albert-Einstein-Allee 23, 89081, Ulm, Germany. peter.radermacher@uni-ulm.de.
Jean-Louis VincentDepartment of Intensive Care, Erasme Hospital, Université Libre de Bruxelles, route de Lennik 808, 1070, Brussels, Belgium. jlvincen@ulb.ac.be.
Claude MartinService d'Anesthésie et de Réanimation, Chemin des Bourrely, Hôpital Nord, Assistance Publique-Hôpitaux de Marseille, Aix Marseille Université, 13015, Marseille, France. Claude.martin@ap-hm.fr.
Aix-Marseille Université · FRCentre Hospitalier Universitaire d'Angers · FRHôpital Nord · FRUniversité Libre de Bruxelles · BE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Guidelines recommend that a mean arterial pressure (MAP) value greater than 65 mm Hg should be the initial blood pressure target in septic shock, but what evidence is there to support this statement? We searched Pubmed and Google Scholar by using the key words 'arterial pressure', 'septic shock', and 'norepinephrine' and retrieved human studies published between 1 January 2000 and 31 July 2014. We identified seven comparative studies: two randomized clinical trials and five observational studies. The results of the literature review suggest that a MAP target of 65 mm Hg is usually sufficient in patients with septic shock. However, a MAP of around 75 to 85 mm Hg may reduce the development of acute kidney injury in patients with chronic arterial hypertension. Because of the high prevalence of chronic arterial hypertension in patients who develop septic shock, this finding is of considerable importance. Future studies should assess interactions between time, fluid volumes administered, and doses of vasopressors.

Indexed as

Arterial PressureButylaminesCritical CareHumansNorepinephrinePhenolsShock, SepticVasoconstrictor AgentsButylaminesNorepinephrinePD 0084430PhenolsVasoconstrictor Agents

Identifiers

PMID25888071
PMCPMC4355573
OpenAlexW2171694388

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.