Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25888060›Full record

ArticleCritical care (London, England)2015

Pharmacokinetic variability and exposures of fluconazole, anidulafungin, and caspofungin in intensive care unit patients: Data from multinational Defining Antibiotic Levels in Intensive care unit (DALI) patients Study.

Mahipal G Sinnollareddy, Jason A Roberts, Jeffrey Lipman, Murat Akova, Matteo Bassetti, Jan J De Waele, Kirsi-Maija Kaukonen, Despoina Koulenti, Claude Martin, Philippe Montravers and 6 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Critical care (London, England), 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 62 papers, 4 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
62citing papers in PubMed, 4 pooled it
8.9field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

62 citing papers in PubMed, 4 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 141 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Guideline
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. Trial
  6. Low Caspofungin Exposure in Patients in Intensive Care Units.Antimicrobial agents and chemotherapy · 2017
    Trial
  7. Trial
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Observational
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Review on the management of intra-abdominal candidiasis.Revista espanola de quimioterapia : publicacion oficial de la Sociedad Espanola de Quimioterapia · 2025
    Review
  14. Low-level direct currents eradicate multi-drug-resistantChemical engineering journal (Lausanne, Switzerland : 1996) · 2025
    Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. ISCCM Position Statement on the Management of Invasive Fungal Infections in the Intensive Care Unit.Indian journal of critical care medicine : peer-reviewed, official publication of Indian Society of Critical Care Medicine · 2024
    Article

2 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

16 authors at 11 institutions in 9 countries.

Mahipal G SinnollareddyBurns Trauma and Critical Care Research Centre, The University of Queensland, Brisbane, Australia. mahi716@yahoo.com.
Jason A RobertsBurns Trauma and Critical Care Research Centre, The University of Queensland, Brisbane, Australia. j.roberts2@uq.edu.au.
Jeffrey LipmanBurns Trauma and Critical Care Research Centre, The University of Queensland, Brisbane, Australia. j.lipman@uq.edu.au.
Murat AkovaSchool of Medicine, Hacettepe University, Ankara, Turkey. makova@hacettepe.edu.tr.
Matteo BassettiAzienda Ospedaliera Universitaria Santa Maria della Misericordia, Udine, Italy. mattba@tin.it.
Jan J De WaeleGhent University Hospital, Ghent, Belgium. Jan.DeWaele@UGent.be.
Kirsi-Maija KaukonenHelsinki University Central Hospital, Helsinki, Finland. maija.kaukonen@monash.edu.
Despoina KoulentiBurns Trauma and Critical Care Research Centre, The University of Queensland, Brisbane, Australia. deskogr@yahoo.gr.
Claude MartinHospital Nord, Marseille, France. claude.martin@mail.ap-hm.fr.
Philippe MontraversCentre Hospitalier Universitaire Bichat-Claude Bernard, AP-HP, Université Paris VII, Paris, France. philippe.montravers@bch.ap-hop-paris.fr.
Jordi RelloCIBERES, Vall d'Hebron Institute of Research, Universitat Autonoma de Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain. jrello@crips.es.
Andrew RhodesSt George's Healthcare NHS Trust and St George's University of London, London, England. andrewrhodes@nhs.net.
Therese StarrRoyal Brisbane and Women's Hospital, Brisbane, Australia. Therese.starr@health.qld.gov.au.
Steven C WallisBurns Trauma and Critical Care Research Centre, The University of Queensland, Brisbane, Australia. s.wallis@uq.edu.au.
George DimopoulosAttikon University Hospital, Athens, Greece. gdimop@med.uoa.gr.
DALI Study authors
University of Queensland · AUCentro de Investigación Biomédica en Red · ESGhent University Hospital · BEHacettepe University · TRHelsinki University Hospital · FIHôpital Bichat-Claude-Bernard · FRHôpital Nord · FROspedale Santa Maria della Misericordia di Udine · ITRoyal Brisbane and Women's Hospital · AUSt George’s University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust · GBUniversity General Hospital Attikon · GR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionThe objective of the study was to describe the pharmacokinetics (PK) of fluconazole, anidulafungin, and caspofungin in critically ill patients and to compare with previously published data. We also sought to determine whether contemporary fluconazole doses achieved PK/pharmacodynamic (PD; PK/PD) targets in this cohort of intensive care unit patients.

methodsThe Defining Antibiotic Levels in Intensive care unit patients (DALI) study was a prospective, multicenter point-prevalence PK study. Sixty-eight intensive care units across Europe participated. Inclusion criteria were met by critically ill patients administered fluconazole (n = 15), anidulafungin (n = 9), and caspofungin (n = 7). Three blood samples (peak, mid-dose, and trough) were collected for PK/PD analysis. PK analysis was performed by using a noncompartmental approach.

resultsThe mean age, weight, and Acute Physiology and Chronic Health Evaluation (APACHE) II scores of the included patients were 58 years, 84 kg, and 22, respectively. Fluconazole, caspofungin, and anidulafungin showed large interindividual variability in this study. In patients receiving fluconazole, 33% did not attain the PK/PD target, ratio of free drug area under the concentration-time curve from 0 to 24 hours to minimum inhibitory concentration (fAUC(0-24)/MIC) ≥100. The fluconazole dose, described in milligrams per kilogram, was found to be significantly associated with achievement of fAUC(0-24)/MIC ≥100 (P = 0.0003).

conclusionsConsiderable interindividual variability was observed for fluconazole, anidulafungin, and caspofungin. A large proportion of the patients (33%) receiving fluconazole did not attain the PK/PD target, which might be related to inadequate dosing. For anidulafungin and caspofungin, dose optimization also appears necessary to minimize variability.

Indexed as

Intensive Care UnitsAgedAnidulafunginAntifungal AgentsCaspofunginCritical IllnessDrug MonitoringEchinocandinsEuropeFemaleFluconazoleHumansLipopeptidesMaleMiddle AgedAnidulafunginAntifungal AgentsCaspofunginEchinocandinsFluconazoleLipopeptides

Identifiers

PMID25888060
PMCPMC4335513
OpenAlexW2156654595

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.