Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25888030›Full record

ArticleGenetics, selection, evolution : GSE2015

Relative extended haplotype homozygosity signals across breeds reveal dairy and beef specific signatures of selection.

Lorenzo Bomba, Ezequiel L Nicolazzi, Marco Milanesi, Riccardo Negrini, Giordano Mancini, Filippo Biscarini, Alessandra Stella, Alessio Valentini, Paolo Ajmone-Marsan

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Genetics, selection, evolution : GSE, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 23 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
23citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

23 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Lorenzo BombaIstituto di Zootecnica, UCSC, via Emilia Parmense 84, Piacenza, 29122, Italy. lorenzo.bomba@unicatt.it.
Ezequiel L NicolazziFondazione Parco Tecnologico Padano, Via Einstein, Loc. Cascina Codazza, Lodi, 26900, Italy. ezequiel.nicolazzi@tecnoparco.org.
Marco MilanesiIstituto di Zootecnica, UCSC, via Emilia Parmense 84, Piacenza, 29122, Italy. marco.milanesi@unicatt.it.
Riccardo NegriniAssociazione Italiana Allevatori (AIA), Via Tomassetti 9, Rome, 00161, Italy. riccardo.negrini@unicatt.it.
Giordano ManciniCenter for Computational Chemistry and Cosmology, Scuola Normale Superiore, Via Consoli del Mare 2, Pisa, 56126, Italy. giordano.mancini@sns.it.
Filippo BiscariniFondazione Parco Tecnologico Padano, Via Einstein, Loc. Cascina Codazza, Lodi, 26900, Italy. filippo.biscarini@tecnoparco.org.
Alessandra StellaFondazione Parco Tecnologico Padano, Via Einstein, Loc. Cascina Codazza, Lodi, 26900, Italy. alessandra.stella@tecnoparco.org.
Alessio ValentiniDipartimento per l'Innovazione nei Sistemi Biologici, Agroalimentari e Forestali (DIBAF), via de Lellis, Viterbo, 01100, Italy. alessio@unitus.it.
Paolo Ajmone-MarsanIstituto di Zootecnica, UCSC, via Emilia Parmense 84, Piacenza, 29122, Italy. paolo.ajmone@unicatt.it.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundA number of methods are available to scan a genome for selection signatures by evaluating patterns of diversity within and between breeds. Among these, "extended haplotype homozygosity" (EHH) is a reliable approach to detect genome regions under recent selective pressure. The objective of this study was to use this approach to identify regions that are under recent positive selection and shared by the most representative Italian dairy and beef cattle breeds.

resultsA total of 3220 animals from Italian Holstein (2179), Italian Brown (775), Simmental (493), Marchigiana (485) and Piedmontese (379) breeds were genotyped with the Illumina BovineSNP50 BeadChip v.1. After standard quality control procedures, genotypes were phased and core haplotypes were identified. The decay of linkage disequilibrium (LD) for each core haplotype was assessed by measuring the EHH. Since accurate estimates of local recombination rates were not available, relative EHH (rEHH) was calculated for each core haplotype. Genomic regions that carry frequent core haplotypes and with significant rEHH values were considered as candidates for recent positive selection. Candidate regions were aligned across to identify signals shared by dairy or beef cattle breeds. Overall, 82 and 87 common regions were detected among dairy and beef cattle breeds, respectively. Bioinformatic analysis identified 244 and 232 genes in these common genomic regions. Gene annotation and pathway analysis showed that these genes are involved in molecular functions that are biologically related to milk or meat production.

conclusionsOur results suggest that a multi-breed approach can lead to the identification of genomic signatures in breeds of cattle that are selected for the same production goal and thus to the localisation of genomic regions of interest in dairy and beef production.

Indexed as

HaplotypesSelection, GeneticAnimalsBreedingCattleDairyingGenomicsHomozygoteMaleMeatMolecular Sequence Annotation

Identifiers

PMID25888030
PMCPMC4383072

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.