Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25887887›Full record

SynthesisCritical care (London, England)2015

Automated versus non-automated weaning for reducing the duration of mechanical ventilation for critically ill adults and children: a cochrane systematic review and meta-analysis.

Louise Rose, Marcus J Schultz, Chris R Cardwell, Philippe Jouvet, Danny F McAuley, Bronagh Blackwood

Registry-linked trialOpen access · goldAbstract readMeta-AnalysisSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Critical care (London, England), 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT03697785 (Weaning Algorithm for Mechanical VEntilation), which is not on this map. Cited by 27 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
27citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
5.3field-weighted citation impact, top 4% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT03697785 naunknown statusnot on this mapstarted 2018, after this paper: background citation

Weaning Algorithm for Mechanical VEntilation (WAVE Study): A Randomised Control Trial Comparing an Open-loop Decision Support System Versus Routine Care for Weaning From Mechanical Ventilation in the Cardiothoracic Intensive Care Unit

TypeinterventionalSponsorRoyal Brompton & Harefield NHS Foundation TrustRan2018 to 2021Enrolled286ConditionsRespiration, Artificial, Critical Care, Respiratory Insufficiency, Intensive Care (ICU) MyopathyArmsBeacon Care System
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

27 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 87 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Guideline
  3. Trial
  4. Trial
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Effects of an extubation readiness test protocol at a tertiary care fully outborn neonatal intensive care unit.Canadian journal of respiratory therapy : CJRT = Revue canadienne de la therapie respiratoire : RCTR · 2019
    Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 5 institutions in 3 countries.

Louise RoseDepartment of Critical Care Medicine, Sunnybrook Health Sciences Centre, 2075 Bayview Ave, Toronto, ON, M4N 3M5, Canada. louise.rose@utoronto.ca.
Marcus J SchultzLaboratory of Experimental Intensive Care and Anesthesiology, Academic Medical Center, University of Amsterdam, Meibergdreef 9, 1105 AZ, Amsterdam, Netherlands. marcus.j.schultz@gmail.com.
Chris R CardwellCentre for Public Health, Queen's University Belfast, University Rd, Belfast, BT7 1NN, UK. c.cardwell@qub.ac.uk.
Philippe JouvetDepartment of Pediatrics, Sainte-Justine Hospital, University of Montreal, 3175 Chemin de la Côte-Sainte-Catherine, Montreal, QC, H3T 1C5, Canada. philippe.jouvet@umontreal.ca.
Danny F McAuleyRegional Intensive Care Unit, Royal Victoria Hospital, Centre for Infection and Immunity, Queen's University of Belfast, University Rd, Belfast, BT7 1NN, UK. d.f.mcauley@qub.ac.uk.
Bronagh BlackwoodCentre for Infection and Immunity, School of Medicine, Dentistry & Biomedical Sciences, Queen's University Belfast, University Rd, Belfast, BT7 1NN, UK. b.blackwood@qub.ac.uk.
Queen's University Belfast · GBAcademic Medical Center · NLCentre Hospitalier Universitaire Sainte-Justine · CARoyal Victoria Hospital · GBSunnybrook Health Science Centre · CA

Funding

Canadian Institutes of Health Research
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionAutomated weaning systems may improve adaptation of mechanical support for a patient's ventilatory needs and facilitate systematic and early recognition of their ability to breathe spontaneously and the potential for discontinuation of ventilation. Our objective was to compare mechanical ventilator weaning duration for critically ill adults and children when managed with automated systems versus non-automated strategies. Secondary objectives were to determine differences in duration of ventilation, intensive care unit (ICU) and hospital length of stay (LOS), mortality, and adverse events.

methodsElectronic databases were searched to 30 September 2013 without language restrictions. We also searched conference proceedings; trial registration websites; and article reference lists. Two authors independently extracted data and assessed risk of bias. We combined data using random-effects modelling.

resultsWe identified 21 eligible trials totalling 1,676 participants. Pooled data from 16 trials indicated that automated systems reduced the geometric mean weaning duration by 30% (95% confidence interval (CI) 13% to 45%), with substantial heterogeneity (I(2) = 87%, P <0.00001). Reduced weaning duration was found with mixed or medical ICU populations (42%, 95% CI 10% to 63%) and Smartcare/PS (28%, 95% CI 7% to 49%) but not with surgical populations or using other systems. Automated systems reduced ventilation duration with no heterogeneity (10%, 95% CI 3% to 16%) and ICU LOS (8%, 95% CI 0% to 15%). There was no strong evidence of effect on mortality, hospital LOS, reintubation, self-extubation and non-invasive ventilation following extubation. Automated systems reduced prolonged mechanical ventilation and tracheostomy. Overall quality of evidence was high.

conclusionsAutomated systems may reduce weaning and ventilation duration and ICU stay. Due to substantial trial heterogeneity an adequately powered, high quality, multi-centre randomized controlled trial is needed.

Indexed as

AutomationCritical IllnessAdultAirway ExtubationChildChild, PreschoolHumansInfantIntensive Care UnitsLength of StayRandomized Controlled Trials as TopicTime FactorsVentilator Weaning

Identifiers

PMID25887887
PMCPMC4344786
OpenAlexW2088085411

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.