Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25887753›Full record

ArticleBMC evolutionary biology2015

Intra-genomic variation in symbiotic dinoflagellates: recent divergence or recombination between lineages?

Shaun P Wilkinson, Paul L Fisher, Madeleine J H van Oppen, Simon K Davy

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC evolutionary biology, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 18 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
18citing papers in PubMed
10.6field-weighted citation impact, top 2% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

18 citing papers in PubMed, 64 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Coral evolutionary responses to microbial symbioses.Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences · 2020
    Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Transcriptomic Analysis of Thermally StressedFrontiers in plant science · 2017
    Article
  16. Maternal effects andRoyal Society open science · 2016
    Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

Shaun P WilkinsonSchool of Biological Sciences, Victoria University of Wellington, Kelburn Parade, Wellington, 6012, New Zealand. shaunpwilkinson@gmail.com.
Paul L FisherSchool of Biological Sciences, Victoria University of Wellington, Kelburn Parade, Wellington, 6012, New Zealand. p.l.fisher@hotmail.com.
Madeleine J H van OppenAustralian Institute of Marine Science, PMB No. 3, Townsville, QL, 4810, Australia. m.vanoppen@aims.gov.au.
Simon K DavySchool of Biological Sciences, Victoria University of Wellington, Kelburn Parade, Wellington, 6012, New Zealand. simon.davy@vuw.ac.nz.
Victoria University of Wellington · NZAustralian Institute of Marine Science · AU

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe symbiosis between corals and the dinoflagellate alga Symbiodinium is essential for the development and survival of coral reefs. Yet this fragile association is highly vulnerable to environmental disturbance. A coral's ability to tolerate temperature stress depends on the fitness of its resident symbionts, whose thermal optima vary extensively between lineages. However, the in hospite population genetic structure of Symbiodinium is poorly understood and mostly based on analysis of bulk DNA extracted from thousands to millions of cells. Using quantitative single-cell PCR, we enumerated DNA polymorphisms in the symbionts of the reef-building coral Pocillopora damicornis, and applied a model selection approach to explore the potential for recombination between coexisting Symbiodinium populations.

resultsTwo distinct Symbiodinium ITS2 sequences (denoted C100 and C109) were retrieved from all P. damicornis colonies analysed. However, the symbiont assemblage consisted of three distinct Symbiodinium populations: cells featuring pure arrays of ITS2 type C109, near-homogeneous cells of type C100 (with trace ITS2 copies of type C109), and those with co-dominant C100 and C109 ITS2 repeats. The symbiont consortia of some colonies consisted almost entirely of these putative C100 × C109 recombinants.

conclusionsOur results are consistent with the occurrence of sexual recombination between Symbiodinium types C100 and C109. While the multiple-copy nature of the ITS2 dictates that the observed pattern of intra-genomic co-dominance may be a result of incomplete concerted evolution of intra-genomic polymorphisms, this is a less likely explanation given the occurrence of homogeneous cells of the C109 type. Conclusive evidence for inter-lineage recombination and introgression in this genus will require either direct observational evidence or a single-cell genotyping approach targeting multiple, single-copy loci.

Indexed as

AnimalsAnthozoaBiological EvolutionCoral ReefsDenaturing Gradient Gel ElectrophoresisDinoflagellidaEnvironmentGenomicsMolecular Sequence DataPolymerase Chain ReactionRecombination, GeneticSymbiosis

Identifiers

PMID25887753
PMCPMC4381663
OpenAlexW2028519399

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.