Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25887697›Full record

ArticleBMC genomics2015

Metagenomic analysis of the Rhinopithecus bieti fecal microbiome reveals a broad diversity of bacterial and glycoside hydrolase profiles related to lignocellulose degradation.

Bo Xu, Weijiang Xu, Junjun Li, Liming Dai, Caiyun Xiong, Xianghua Tang, Yunjuan Yang, Yuelin Mu, Junpei Zhou, Junmei Ding and 2 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC genomics, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 32 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
32citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

32 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Analysis of fungal diversity in the feces ofFrontiers in veterinary science · 2024
    Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Effects of oat (Frontiers in microbiology · 2022
    Article
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Analysis of microbial diversity in the feces ofFrontiers in microbiology · 2022
    Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors.

Bo XuSchool of Life Science, Yunnan Normal University, Kunming, 650500, China. xubo128028@163.com.
Weijiang XuSchool of Life Science, Yunnan Normal University, Kunming, 650500, China. sn-xwj@163.com.
Junjun LiSchool of Life Science, Yunnan Normal University, Kunming, 650500, China. 1979ljsx@163.com.
Liming DaiSchool of Life Science, Yunnan Normal University, Kunming, 650500, China. 690058128@qq.com.
Caiyun XiongSchool of Life Science, Yunnan Normal University, Kunming, 650500, China. xiongcaiyun928@126.com.
Xianghua TangSchool of Life Science, Yunnan Normal University, Kunming, 650500, China. txh13888381045@163.com.
Yunjuan YangSchool of Life Science, Yunnan Normal University, Kunming, 650500, China. fcyangyunjuan@163.com.
Yuelin MuSchool of Life Science, Yunnan Normal University, Kunming, 650500, China. muyuelin@sohu.com.
Junpei ZhouSchool of Life Science, Yunnan Normal University, Kunming, 650500, China. zhoujunpei_yn@126.com.
Junmei DingSchool of Life Science, Yunnan Normal University, Kunming, 650500, China. djm3417@163.com.
Qian WuSchool of Life Science, Yunnan Normal University, Kunming, 650500, China. qian99223@163.com.
Zunxi HuangSchool of Life Science, Yunnan Normal University, Kunming, 650500, China. huangzunxi@163.com.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe animal gastrointestinal tract contains a complex community of microbes, whose composition ultimately reflects the co-evolution of microorganisms with their animal host and the diet adopted by the host. Although the importance of gut microbiota of humans has been well demonstrated, there is a paucity of research regarding non-human primates (NHPs), especially herbivorous NHPs.

resultsIn this study, an analysis of 97,942 pyrosequencing reads generated from Rhinopithecus bieti fecal DNA extracts was performed to help better understanding of the microbial diversity and functional capacity of the R. bieti gut microbiome. The taxonomic analysis of the metagenomic reads indicated that R. bieti fecal microbiomes were dominated by Firmicutes, Bacteroidetes, Proteobacteria and Actinobacteria phyla. The comparative analysis of taxonomic classification revealed that the metagenome of R. bieti was characterized by an overrepresentation of bacteria of phylum Fibrobacteres and Spirochaetes as compared with other animals. Primary functional categories were associated mainly with protein, carbohydrates, amino acids, DNA and RNA metabolism, cofactors, cell wall and capsule and membrane transport. Comparing glycoside hydrolase profiles of R. bieti with those of other animal revealed that the R. bieti microbiome was most closely related to cow rumen.

conclusionsMetagenomic and functional analysis demonstrated that R. bieti possesses a broad diversity of bacteria and numerous glycoside hydrolases responsible for lignocellulosic biomass degradation which might reflect the adaptations associated with a diet rich in fibrous matter. These results would contribute to the limited body of NHPs metagenome studies and provide a unique genetic resource of plant cell wall degrading microbial enzymes. However, future studies on the metagenome sequencing of R. bieti regarding the effects of age, genetics, diet and environment on the composition and activity of the metagenomes are required.

Indexed as

MetagenomeMicrobiotaAnimalsArchaeaBacteriaBiodiversityCattleColobinaeDogsEukaryotaFecesGlycoside HydrolasesHumansLigninMetagenomicsMiceGlycoside HydrolasesLigninlignocellulose

Identifiers

PMID25887697
PMCPMC4369366

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.