Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25887671›Full record

ArticleBMC bioinformatics2015

Identifying named entities from PubMed for enriching semantic categories.

Sun Kim, Zhiyong Lu, W John Wilbur

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC bioinformatics, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Assessing the enrichment of dietary supplement coverage in the Unified Medical Language System.Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association : JAMIA · 2020
    Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Sun KimNational Center for Biotechnology Information, National Library of Medicine, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, 20894, MD, USA. sun.kim@nih.gov.
Zhiyong LuNational Center for Biotechnology Information, National Library of Medicine, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, 20894, MD, USA. zhiyong.lu@nih.gov.
W John WilburNational Center for Biotechnology Information, National Library of Medicine, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, 20894, MD, USA. wilbur@ncbi.nlm.nih.gov.

Funding

Named Entity Recognition and Relationship Extraction in BiomedicineZIALM091813 · NLM · NATIONAL LIBRARY OF MEDICINE · PI LU, ZHIYONG · 2013 to 2022
$13.4M
Natural Language Processing Techniques To Enhance Information Access.ZIALM000090 · NLM · NATIONAL LIBRARY OF MEDICINE · PI WILBUR, WILLY · 2009 to 2015
$3.4M
General and Semi-supervised Machine Learning Applied to BioinformaticsZIALM000089 · NLM · NATIONAL LIBRARY OF MEDICINE · PI WILBUR, WILLY · 2009 to 2015
$3.2M
Free Text Gene Name RecognitionZIALM000093 · NLM · NATIONAL LIBRARY OF MEDICINE · PI WILBUR, WILLY · 2009 to 2015
$1.6M
A Document Processing SystemZIALM000022 · NLM · NATIONAL LIBRARY OF MEDICINE · PI WILBUR, WILLY · 2009 to 2015
$1.3M
Intramural NIH HHS
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundControlled vocabularies such as the Unified Medical Language System (UMLS) and Medical Subject Headings (MeSH) are widely used for biomedical natural language processing (NLP) tasks. However, the standard terminology in such collections suffers from low usage in biomedical literature, e.g. only 13% of UMLS terms appear in MEDLINE.

resultsWe here propose an efficient and effective method for extracting noun phrases for biomedical semantic categories. The proposed approach utilizes simple linguistic patterns to select candidate noun phrases based on headwords, and a machine learning classifier is used to filter out noisy phrases. For experiments, three NLP rules were tested and manually evaluated by three annotators. Our approaches showed over 93% precision on average for the headwords, "gene", "protein", "disease", "cell" and "cells".

conclusionsAlthough biomedical terms in knowledge-rich resources may define semantic categories, variations of the controlled terms in literature are still difficult to identify. The method proposed here is an effort to narrow the gap between controlled vocabularies and the entities used in text. Our extraction method cannot completely eliminate manual evaluation, however a simple and automated solution with high precision performance provides a convenient way for enriching semantic categories by incorporating terms obtained from the literature.

Indexed as

Natural Language ProcessingPubMedSemanticsUnified Medical Language SystemVocabulary, ControlledArtificial IntelligenceHumansMedical Subject Headings

Identifiers

PMID25887671
PMCPMC4349776

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.