Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25887649›Full record

ArticleCritical care (London, England)2015

Dynamic changes of microbial flora and therapeutic consequences in persistent peritonitis.

Philippe Montravers, Guillaume Dufour, Jean Guglielminotti, Mathieu Desmard, Claudette Muller, Hamda Houissa, Nicolas Allou, Jean-Pierre Marmuse, Pascal Augustin

Registry-linked trialOpen access · goldAbstract readComparative Study
In one paragraph

Article in Critical care (London, England), 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT06901544 (Capillary Leak Index as a Prognostic Indicator for Post-Operative Abdominal Sepsis in Critically Ill Patients), which is not on this map. Cited by 23 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
23citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
7.4field-weighted citation impact, top 2% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT06901544 completednot on this mapstarted 2025, after this paper: background citation

Capillary Leak Index as a Prognostic Indicator for Post-Operative Abdominal Sepsis in Critically Ill Patients

Typeobservational_patient_registrySponsorAin Shams UniversityRan2025 to 2025Enrolled100ConditionsIntra-Abdominal Infections, Intestinal Obstruction, Appendicitis Acute, Perforated Viscus
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

23 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 56 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Observational
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Evaluation of anidulafungin in the treatment of intra-abdominal candidiasis: a pooled analysis of patient-level data from 5 prospective studies.European journal of clinical microbiology & infectious diseases : official publication of the European Society of Clinical Microbiology · 2019
    Article
  15. Abdominal Sepsis: An Update.Journal of critical care medicine (Universitatea de Medicina si Farmacie din Targu-Mures) · 2018
    Review
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Review
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.

Philippe MontraversDépartement d'Anesthésie Réanimation, Université Paris Diderot, APHP, CHU Bichat-Claude Bernard, 46, Rue Henri Huchard, Paris, 75018, France. philippe.montravers@bch.aphp.fr.
Guillaume DufourDépartement d'Anesthésie Réanimation, Université Paris Diderot, APHP, CHU Bichat-Claude Bernard, 46, Rue Henri Huchard, Paris, 75018, France. guillaume.dufour@bch.aphp.fr.
Jean GuglielminottiDépartement d'Anesthésie Réanimation, Université Paris Diderot, APHP, CHU Bichat-Claude Bernard, 46, Rue Henri Huchard, Paris, 75018, France. jean.guglielminotti@bch.aphp.fr.
Mathieu DesmardDépartement d'Anesthésie Réanimation, Université Paris Diderot, APHP, CHU Bichat-Claude Bernard, 46, Rue Henri Huchard, Paris, 75018, France. mathieu.desmard@bch.aphp.fr.
Claudette MullerUniversité Paris Diderot, APHP, CHU Bichat-Claude Bernard, Laboratoire de Microbiologie, Paris, France. claudette.muller@bch.aphp.fr.
Hamda HouissaDépartement d'Anesthésie Réanimation, Université Paris Diderot, APHP, CHU Bichat-Claude Bernard, 46, Rue Henri Huchard, Paris, 75018, France. hamda.houissa@bch.aphp.fr.
Nicolas AllouDépartement d'Anesthésie Réanimation, Université Paris Diderot, APHP, CHU Bichat-Claude Bernard, 46, Rue Henri Huchard, Paris, 75018, France. nicolas.allou@bch.aphp.fr.
Jean-Pierre MarmuseUniversité Paris Diderot, APHP, CHU Bichat-Claude Bernard, Service de Chirurgie Générale, Paris, France. jean-pierre.marmuse@bch.aphp.fr.
Pascal AugustinDépartement d'Anesthésie Réanimation, Université Paris Diderot, APHP, CHU Bichat-Claude Bernard, 46, Rue Henri Huchard, Paris, 75018, France. pascal.augustin@bch.aphp.fr.
Assistance Publique – Hôpitaux de Paris · FRDélégation Paris 7 · FRUniversité Claude Bernard Lyon 1 · FRUniversité Paris Cité · FR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionPersistent peritonitis is a frequent complication of secondary peritonitis requiring additional reoperations and antibiotic therapy. This situation raises specific concerns due to microbiological changes in peritoneal samples, especially the emergence of multidrug-resistant (MDR) strains. Although this complication has been extensively studied, the rate and dynamics of MDR strains have rarely been analysed.

methodsWe compared the clinical, microbiological and therapeutic data of consecutive ICU patients admitted for postoperative peritonitis either without subsequent reoperation (n = 122) or who underwent repeated surgery for persistent peritonitis with positive peritoneal fluid cultures (n = 98). Data collected on index surgery for the treatment of postoperative peritonitis were compared between these two groups. In the patients with persistent peritonitis, the data obtained at the first, second and third reoperations were compared with those of index surgery. Risk factors for emergence of MDR strains were assessed.

resultsAt the time of index surgery, no parameters were able to differentiate patients with or without persistent peritonitis except for increased severity and high proportions of fungal isolates in the persistent peritonitis group. The mean time to reoperation was similar from the first to the third reoperation (range: 5 to 6 days). Septic shock was the main clinical expression of persistent peritonitis. A progressive shift of peritoneal flora was observed with the number of reoperations, comprising extinction of susceptible strains and emergence of 85 MDR strains. The proportion of patients harbouring MDR strains increased from 41% at index surgery, to 49% at the first, 54% at the second (P = 0.037) and 76% at the third reoperation (P = 0.003 versus index surgery). In multivariate analysis, the only risk factor for emergence of MDR strains was time to reoperation (OR 1.19 per day, 95%CI (1.08 to 1.33), P = 0.0006).

conclusionsInitial severity, presence of Candida in surgical samples and inadequate source control are the major risk factors for persistent peritonitis. Emergence of MDR bacteria is frequent and increases progressively with the number of reoperations. No link was demonstrated between emergence of MDR strains and antibiotic regimens, while source control and its timing appeared to be major determinants of emergence of MDR strains.

Indexed as

ReoperationAnti-Bacterial AgentsAscitic FluidCandidaDrug Resistance, Multiple, BacterialFemaleHumansIntensive Care UnitsMaleMiddle AgedPeritoneal LavagePeritonitisPostoperative ComplicationsRisk FactorsSepsisSeverity of Illness IndexAnti-Bacterial Agents

Identifiers

PMID25887649
PMCPMC4354758
OpenAlexW2130022560

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.