Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25887605›Full record

ArticleBMC genomics2015

Genomic factors related to tissue tropism in Chlamydia pneumoniae infection.

Thomas Weinmaier, Jonathan Hoser, Sebastian Eck, Inga Kaufhold, Kensuke Shima, Tim M Strom, Thomas Rattei, Jan Rupp

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC genomics, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed
1.1field-weighted citation impact, top 23% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed, 14 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Visual Screening of Genetic Polymorphisms inSensors (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026
    Article
  2. Sharp increase in Chlamydia pneumoniae infections in 2024 in Germany.European journal of clinical microbiology & infectious diseases : official publication of the European Society of Clinical Microbiology · 2025
    Article
  3. Journal of bacteriology · 2025
    Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Insights Into aFrontiers in cellular and infection microbiology · 2020
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 5 institutions in 2 countries.

Thomas WeinmaierDivision of Computational Systems Biology, Department of Microbiology and Ecosystem Science, University of Vienna, 1090, Vienna, Austria. Thomas.Weinmaier@univie.ac.at.
Jonathan HoserDepartment of Genome Oriented Bioinformatics, Technical University Munich, 85354, Freising, Germany. Jonathan.Hoser@helmholtz-muenchen.de.
Sebastian EckCenter for Human Genetics and Laboratory Diagnostics Dr. Klein, Dr. Rost and Colleagues, 82152, Martinsried, Germany. Sebastian.Eck@medizinische-genetik.de.
Inga KaufholdDepartment of Molecular and Clinical Infectious Diseases, University of Luebeck, 23538, Luebeck, Germany. Inga.Kaufhold@uksh.de.
Kensuke ShimaDepartment of Molecular and Clinical Infectious Diseases, University of Luebeck, 23538, Luebeck, Germany. Kensuke.shima@uksh.de.
Tim M StromInstitute of Human Genetics, Helmholtz Center Munich, 85764, Neuherberg, Germany. TimStrom@helmholtz-muenchen.de.
Thomas RatteiDivision of Computational Systems Biology, Department of Microbiology and Ecosystem Science, University of Vienna, 1090, Vienna, Austria. Thomas.Rattei@univie.ac.at.
Jan RuppDepartment of Molecular and Clinical Infectious Diseases, University of Luebeck, 23538, Luebeck, Germany. Jan.Rupp@uksh.de.
University of Lübeck · DEUniversity of Vienna · ATCS Diagnostics · DEHelmholtz Zentrum München · DETechnical University of Munich · DE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundChlamydia pneumoniae (Cpn) are obligate intracellular bacteria that cause acute infections of the upper and lower respiratory tract and have been implicated in chronic inflammatory diseases. Although of significant clinical relevance, complete genome sequences of only four clinical Cpn strains have been obtained. All of them were isolated from the respiratory tract and shared more than 99% sequence identity. Here we investigate genetic differences on the whole-genome level that are related to Cpn tissue tropism and pathogenicity.

resultsWe have sequenced the genomes of 18 clinical isolates from different anatomical sites (e.g. lung, blood, coronary arteries) of diseased patients, and one animal isolate. In total 1,363 SNP loci and 184 InDels have been identified in the genomes of all clinical Cpn isolates. These are distributed throughout the whole chlamydial genome and enriched in highly variable regions. The genomes show clear evidence of recombination in at least one potential region but no phage insertions. The tyrP gene was always encoded as single copy in all vascular isolates. Phylogenetic reconstruction revealed distinct evolutionary lineages containing primarily non-respiratory Cpn isolates. In one of these, clinical isolates from coronary arteries and blood monocytes were closely grouped together. They could be distinguished from all other isolates by characteristic nsSNPs in genes involved in RB to EB transition, inclusion membrane formation, bacterial stress response and metabolism.

conclusionsThis study substantially expands the genomic data of Cpn and elucidates its evolutionary history. The translation of the observed Cpn genetic differences into biological functions and the prediction of novel pathogen-oriented diagnostic strategies have to be further explored.

Indexed as

TropismAnimalsBloodChlamydophila InfectionsChlamydophila pneumoniaeCoronary VesselsGenome, BacterialHumansINDEL MutationLungPhylogenyPolymorphism, Single NucleotideSequence Analysis, DNA

Identifiers

PMID25887605
PMCPMC4489044
OpenAlexW2028546573

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.