Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25887599›Full record

ArticleBMC neuroscience2015

Effects of task and age on the magnitude and structure of force fluctuations: insights into underlying neuro-behavioral processes.

Solveig Vieluf, Jean-Jacques Temprado, Eric Berton, Viktor K Jirsa, Rita Sleimen-Malkoun

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC neuroscience, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 23 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
23citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

23 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Altered Bimanual Kinetic and Kinematic Motor Control Capabilities in Older Women.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2023
    Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Solveig VielufAix-Marseille Université, CNRS, Institut des Sciences du Mouvement UMR 7287, 13288, Marseille cedex 09, France. solveig.vieluf@univ-amu.fr.
Jean-Jacques TempradoAix-Marseille Université, CNRS, Institut des Sciences du Mouvement UMR 7287, 13288, Marseille cedex 09, France. jean-jacques.temprado@univ-amu.fr.
Eric BertonAix-Marseille Université, CNRS, Institut des Sciences du Mouvement UMR 7287, 13288, Marseille cedex 09, France. eric.berton@univ-amu.fr.
Viktor K JirsaAix-Marseille Université, Inserm, Institut de Neurosciences des Systèmes UMR_S 1106, 13385, Marseille, France. viktor.jirsa@univ-amu.fr.
Rita Sleimen-MalkounAix-Marseille Université, CNRS, Institut des Sciences du Mouvement UMR 7287, 13288, Marseille cedex 09, France. rita.sleimen-malkoun@univ-amu.fr.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe present study aimed at characterizing the effects of increasing (relative) force level and aging on isometric force control. To achieve this objective and to infer changes in the underlying control mechanisms, measures of information transmission, as well as magnitude and time-frequency structure of behavioral variability were applied to force-time-series.

resultsOlder adults were found to be weaker, more variable, and less efficient than young participants. As a function of force level, efficiency followed an inverted-U shape in both groups, suggesting a similar organization of the force control system. The time-frequency structure of force output fluctuations was only significantly affected by task conditions. Specifically, a narrower spectral distribution with more long-range correlations and an inverted-U pattern of complexity changes were observed with increasing force level. Although not significant older participants displayed on average a less complex behavior for low and intermediate force levels. The changes in force signal's regularity presented a strong dependence on time-scales, which significantly interacted with age and condition. An inverted-U profile was only observed for the time-scale relevant to the sensorimotor control process. However, in both groups the peak was not aligned with the optimum of efficiency.

conclusionOur results support the view that behavioral variability, in terms of magnitude and structure, has a functional meaning and affords non-invasive markers of the adaptations of the sensorimotor control system to various constraints. The measures of efficiency and variability ought to be considered as complementary since they convey specific information on the organization of control processes. The reported weak age effect on variability and complexity measures suggests that the behavioral expression of the loss of complexity hypothesis is not as straightforward as conventionally admitted. However, group differences did not completely vanish, which suggests that age differences can be more or less apparent depending on task properties and whether difficulty is scaled in relative or absolute terms.

Indexed as

AdultAgedAgingFemaleFingersHumansIsometric ContractionMaleMiddle AgedPsychomotor PerformanceYoung Adult

Identifiers

PMID25887599
PMCPMC4359767

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.