Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25887593›Full record

ArticleGenome biology2015

Evaluating intra- and inter-individual variation in the human placental transcriptome.

David A Hughes, Martin Kircher, Zhisong He, Song Guo, Genevieve L Fairbrother, Carlos S Moreno, Philipp Khaitovich, Mark Stoneking

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Genome biology, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 32 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
32citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
5.7field-weighted citation impact, top 4% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

32 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 63 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Autophagy · 2026
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. The Molecular Biology of Placental Transport of Calcium to the Human Foetus.International journal of molecular sciences · 2025
    Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 5 institutions in 4 countries.

David A HughesMax-Planck Institute for Evolutionary Anthropology, Deutscher Platz 6, Leipzig, 04103, Germany. hughes.evoanth@gmail.com.
Martin KircherMax-Planck Institute for Evolutionary Anthropology, Deutscher Platz 6, Leipzig, 04103, Germany. mkircher@u.washington.edu.
Zhisong HeCAS-MPG Partner Institute for Computational Biology, 320 Yue Yang Road, Shanghai, 200031, P.R. China. hezhisong@picb.ac.cn.
Song GuoCAS-MPG Partner Institute for Computational Biology, 320 Yue Yang Road, Shanghai, 200031, P.R. China. song@picb.ac.cn.
Genevieve L FairbrotherObstetrics and Gynecology of Atlanta, 1100 Johnson Ferry Rd NE Suite 800, Center 2, Atlanta, GA, 30342, USA. gfairbrother@comcast.net.
Carlos S MorenoDepartment of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine and Department of Biomedical Informatics, Emory University, Atlanta, GA, 30322, USA. cmoreno@emory.edu.
Philipp KhaitovichCAS-MPG Partner Institute for Computational Biology, 320 Yue Yang Road, Shanghai, 200031, P.R. China. khaitovich@eva.mpg.de.
Mark StonekingMax-Planck Institute for Evolutionary Anthropology, Deutscher Platz 6, Leipzig, 04103, Germany. stoneking@eva.mpg.de.
Center for Excellence in Molecular Cell Science · CNEmory University · USInstitut de Biologia Evolutiva · ESMax Planck Institute for Evolutionary Anthropology · DEUniversity of Washington · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundGene expression variation is a phenotypic trait of particular interest as it represents the initial link between genotype and other phenotypes. Analyzing how such variation apportions among and within groups allows for the evaluation of how genetic and environmental factors influence such traits. It also provides opportunities to identify genes and pathways that may have been influenced by non-neutral processes. Here we use a population genetics framework and next generation sequencing to evaluate how gene expression variation is apportioned among four human groups in a natural biological tissue, the placenta.

resultsWe estimate that on average, 33.2%, 58.9%, and 7.8% of the placental transcriptome is explained by variation within individuals, among individuals, and among human groups, respectively. Additionally, when technical and biological traits are included in models of gene expression they each account for roughly 2% of total gene expression variation. Notably, the variation that is significantly different among groups is enriched in biological pathways associated with immune response, cell signaling, and metabolism. Many biological traits demonstrate correlated changes in expression in numerous pathways of potential interest to clinicians and evolutionary biologists. Finally, we estimate that the majority of the human placental transcriptome exhibits expression profiles consistent with neutrality; the remainder are consistent with stabilizing selection, directional selection, or diversifying selection.

conclusionsWe apportion placental gene expression variation into individual, population, and biological trait factors and identify how each influence the transcriptome. Additionally, we advance methods to associate expression profiles with different forms of selection.

Indexed as

Genetics, PopulationGenetic VariationChromosome MappingFemaleGene ExpressionGenotypeHigh-Throughput Nucleotide SequencingHumansPlacentaPregnancyQuantitative Trait LociTranscriptome

Identifiers

PMID25887593
PMCPMC4404591
OpenAlexW2097705422

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.