Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25887575›Full record

ReviewCritical care (London, England)2015

Transferring the critically ill patient: are we there yet?

Joep M Droogh, Marije Smit, Anthony R Absalom, Jack J M Ligtenberg, Jan G Zijlstra

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Critical care (London, England), 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 41 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
41citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

41 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Helicopter emergency medical services for interfacility transfers: an Italian expert consensus.Scandinavian journal of trauma, resuscitation and emergency medicine · 2026
    Article
  5. Article
  6. A scoping review of global approaches to education in adult critical care retrieval.African journal of emergency medicine : Revue africaine de la medecine d'urgence · 2026
    Article
  7. Five-year retrospective analysis of invasiveCardiovascular diagnosis and therapy · 2026
    Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. [The SCATTER project: computer-based simulation in the strategic transfer of intensive care patients].Bundesgesundheitsblatt, Gesundheitsforschung, Gesundheitsschutz · 2024
    Article
  15. Observational
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Carbon dioxide levels of ventilated adult critically ill post-operative patients on arrival at the intensive care unit.The Southern African journal of critical care : the official journal of the Critical Care Society · 2023
    Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Joep M DrooghDepartment of Critical Care, Research Program for Critical Care, Anesthesiology, Per-operative and Emergency medicine (CAPE), University Medical Center Groningen, University of Groningen, Hanzeplein 1, 9700 RB, Groningen, The Netherlands. j.m.droogh@umcg.nl.
Marije SmitDepartment of Critical Care, Research Program for Critical Care, Anesthesiology, Per-operative and Emergency medicine (CAPE), University Medical Center Groningen, University of Groningen, Hanzeplein 1, 9700 RB, Groningen, The Netherlands. m.smit@umcg.nl.
Anthony R AbsalomDepartment of Anesthesiology, Research Program for Critical Care, Anesthesiology, Per-operative and Emergency medicine (CAPE), University Medical Center Groningen, University of Groningen, Hanzeplein 1, 9700 RB, Groningen, The Netherlands. a.r.absalom@umcg.nl.
Jack J M LigtenbergEmergency Department, Research Program for Critical Care, Anesthesiology, Per-operative and Emergency medicine (CAPE), University Medical Center Groningen, University of Groningen, Hanzeplein 1, 9700 RB, Groningen, The Netherlands. j.j.m.ligtenberg@umcg.nl.
Jan G ZijlstraDepartment of Critical Care, Research Program for Critical Care, Anesthesiology, Per-operative and Emergency medicine (CAPE), University Medical Center Groningen, University of Groningen, Hanzeplein 1, 9700 RB, Groningen, The Netherlands. j.g.zijlstra@umcg.nl.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

During the past few decades the numbers of ICUs and beds has increased significantly, but so too has the demand for intensive care. Currently large, and increasing, numbers of critically ill patients require transfer between critical care units. Inter-unit transfer poses significant risks to critically ill patients, particularly those requiring multiple organ support. While the safety and quality of inter-unit and hospital transfers appear to have improved over the years, the effectiveness of specific measures to improve safety have not been confirmed by randomized controlled trials. It is generally accepted that critically ill patients should be transferred by specialized retrieval teams, but the composition, training and assessment of these teams is still a matter of debate. Since it is likely that the numbers and complexity of these transfers will increase in the near future, further studies are warranted.

Indexed as

Critical IllnessPatient TransferAmbulancesEquipment and SuppliesHumansPatient Care TeamPatient SafetyQuality Assurance, Health Care

Identifiers

PMID25887575
PMCPMC4335540

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.