Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25887570›Full record

ArticleBMC genomics2015

SV-AUTOPILOT: optimized, automated construction of structural variation discovery and benchmarking pipelines.

Wai Yi Leung, Tobias Marschall, Yogesh Paudel, Laurent Falquet, Hailiang Mei, Alexander Schönhuth, Tiffanie Yael Maoz Moss

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC genomics, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Wai Yi LeungSequencing Analysis Support Core, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, The Netherlands. W.Y.Leung@lumc.nl.
Tobias MarschallCenter for Bioinformatics, Saarland University, Saarbrücken, Germany. t.marschall@mpi-inf.mpg.de.
Yogesh PaudelAnimal Breeding and Genomics Centre, Wageningen University, Wageningen, The Netherlands. paudelyogesh@gmail.com.
Laurent FalquetUniversity of Fribourg and Swiss Institute of Bioinformatics, Fribourg, Switzerland. Laurent.Falquet@unifr.ch.
Hailiang MeiSequencing Analysis Support Core, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, The Netherlands. h.mei@lumc.nl.
Alexander SchönhuthCentrum Wiskunde and Informatica, Amsterdam, The Netherlands. A.Schoenhuth@cwi.nl.
Tiffanie Yael Maoz MossWeizmann Institute of Science, Rehovot, Israel. yaelmaozphd@gmail.com.

Funding

European Research Council 249894
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundMany tools exist to predict structural variants (SVs), utilizing a variety of algorithms. However, they have largely been developed and tested on human germline or somatic (e.g. cancer) variation. It seems appropriate to exploit this wealth of technology available for humans also for other species. Objectives of this work included: a) Creating an automated, standardized pipeline for SV prediction. b) Identifying the best tool(s) for SV prediction through benchmarking. c) Providing a statistically sound method for merging SV calls.

resultsThe SV-AUTOPILOT meta-tool platform is an automated pipeline for standardization of SV prediction and SV tool development in paired-end next-generation sequencing (NGS) analysis. SV-AUTOPILOT comes in the form of a virtual machine, which includes all datasets, tools and algorithms presented here. The virtual machine easily allows one to add, replace and update genomes, SV callers and post-processing routines and therefore provides an easy, out-of-the-box environment for complex SV discovery tasks. SV-AUTOPILOT was used to make a direct comparison between 7 popular SV tools on the Arabidopsis thaliana genome using the Landsberg (Ler) ecotype as a standardized dataset. Recall and precision measurements suggest that Pindel and Clever were the most adaptable to this dataset across all size ranges while Delly performed well for SVs larger than 250 nucleotides. A novel, statistically-sound merging process, which can control the false discovery rate, reduced the false positive rate on the Arabidopsis benchmark dataset used here by >60%.

conclusionSV-AUTOPILOT provides a meta-tool platform for future SV tool development and the benchmarking of tools on other genomes using a standardized pipeline. It optimizes detection of SVs in non-human genomes using statistically robust merging. The benchmarking in this study has demonstrated the power of 7 different SV tools for analyzing different size classes and types of structural variants. The optional merge feature enriches the call set and reduces false positives providing added benefit to researchers planning to validate SVs. SV-AUTOPILOT is a powerful, new meta-tool for biologists as well as SV tool developers.

Indexed as

Genetic VariationGenome, HumanGenomicsHigh-Throughput Nucleotide SequencingHumansSequence DeletionSoftware

Identifiers

PMID25887570
PMCPMC4520269

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.