Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25887534›Full record

SynthesisBMC musculoskeletal disorders2015

Single administration of intra-articular bupivacaine in arthroscopic knee surgery: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Qi-Bin Sun, Shi-Dong Liu, Qin-Jun Meng, Hua-Zheng Qu, Zheng Zhang

Open access · goldAbstract readMeta-AnalysisSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in BMC musculoskeletal disorders, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 18 papers, 4 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
18citing papers in PubMed, 4 pooled it
4.1field-weighted citation impact, top 6% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

18 citing papers in PubMed, 4 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 51 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. Trial
  6. Trial
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Frontiers in veterinary science · 2021
    Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Qi-Bin SunDepartment of Spine and Joint Surgery, The Third People's Hospital of Jinan, No.1 North Industrial Road, Wangsheren North Street, Jinan, 250101, Shandong, People's Republic of China. sunqibinjinan@163.com.
Shi-Dong LiuDepartment of Spine and Joint Surgery, The Third People's Hospital of Jinan, No.1 North Industrial Road, Wangsheren North Street, Jinan, 250101, Shandong, People's Republic of China. shidongliu2670@126.com.
Qin-Jun MengDepartment of Spine and Joint Surgery, The Third People's Hospital of Jinan, No.1 North Industrial Road, Wangsheren North Street, Jinan, 250101, Shandong, People's Republic of China. mengqj1989@163.com.
Hua-Zheng QuDepartment of Spine and Joint Surgery, The Third People's Hospital of Jinan, No.1 North Industrial Road, Wangsheren North Street, Jinan, 250101, Shandong, People's Republic of China. blueqhz@sina.com.
Zheng ZhangDepartment of Spine and Joint Surgery, The Third People's Hospital of Jinan, No.1 North Industrial Road, Wangsheren North Street, Jinan, 250101, Shandong, People's Republic of China. bone163@163.com.
Fourth People’s Hospital of Jinan · CN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundSingle administration of intra-articular (IA) bupivacaine for pain relief after arthroscopic knee surgery is effective, but its active duration and dose-response relationship is unclear. We conducted this meta-analysis to summarize all published randomized controlled trials (RCTs), thus providing the most recent information on the safety and efficacy of single-administration IA bupivacaine for pain relief after arthroscopic knee surgery, and to determine whether a dose-response relationship exists.

methodsA systematic electronic literature search (through April 2014) was conducted to identify those RCTs that addressed the safety and efficacy of a single administration of IA bupivacaine for pain management after arthroscopic knee surgery. Subgroup analysis was conducted to determine changes in visual analog scale (VAS) scores at seven postoperative time points. Meta-regression and subgroup analyses were carried out to assess the effects of various treatment factors on efficacy and to evaluate the dose-response relationship of bupivacaine. Weighted mean differences or relative risks were calculated and pooled using a random-effects model.

resultsTwenty-eight trials involving 1,560 patients who underwent arthroscopic knee surgery met the inclusion criteria. The trials were subject to medium risk of bias. VAS scores at 2, 4, 6, 12, and 24 h postoperatively were significantly lower, the number of patients requiring supplementary analgesia was smaller, and the time to first request for analgesia was longer in the IA bupivacaine group than in the placebo group. The analgesic effect of single-administration IA bupivacaine may be associated with the effect of concomitant administration of epinephrine and concentration of bupivacaine, and no dose-response relationship was identified. No significant difference in side effects was detected between groups.

conclusionsCurrent evidence shows that the use of single-administration IA bupivacaine is effective for postoperative pain management in patients undergoing arthroscopic knee surgery, with satisfactory short-term safety. Low-dose administration of IA bupivacaine 0.5% combined with epinephrine adjuvant in clinical practice should be performed. Additional high-quality RCTs with longer follow-up periods are required to examine the safety of single-administration IA bupivacaine.

Indexed as

Anesthetics, LocalArthroscopyBupivacaineDose-Response Relationship, DrugHumansInjections, Intra-ArticularPain MeasurementPostoperative PainAnesthetics, LocalBupivacaine

Identifiers

PMID25887534
PMCPMC4328055
OpenAlexW1984976324

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.