Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25887475›Full record

SynthesisBMC genetics2015

Variants Fok1 and Bsm1 on VDR are associated with the melanoma risk: evidence from the published epidemiological studies.

Wei Hou, Xuefeng Wan, Junwei Fan

Abstract readMeta-Analysis
In one paragraph

Synthesis in BMC genetics, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
12citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

12 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Vitamin D status and risk for malignant cutaneous melanoma: recent advances.European journal of cancer prevention : the official journal of the European Cancer Prevention Organisation (ECP) · 2017
    Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Vitamin D Deficiency in Uygurs and Kazaks Is Associated with Polymorphisms in CYP2R1 and DHCR7/NADSYN1 Genes.Medical science monitor : international medical journal of experimental and clinical research · 2015
    Article
  12. DHPLC Elution Patterns ofCancer genomics & proteomics
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Wei HouDepartment of Dermatology and Venereology, the First Affiliated Hospital of Xinjiang Medical University, Urumqi, 830054, People's Republic of China. iamhouwei@163.com.
Xuefeng WanDepartment of Dermatology and Venereology, the First Affiliated Hospital of Xinjiang Medical University, Urumqi, 830054, People's Republic of China. xuefeng_wan@126.com.
Junwei FanDepartment of Dermatology and Venereology, the First Affiliated Hospital of Xinjiang Medical University, Urumqi, 830054, People's Republic of China. fanjunw1300@sina.com.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe vitamin D receptor (VDR) mediates the major cellular activities of vitamin D and regulates various signaling pathways implicated in cancer development and progression. VDR variants have been found associated with the risk of developing melanoma; however, previous epidemiological studies are inconsistent. We have systematically reviewed the published epidemiological literature and conducted a meta-analysis to assess associations between common VDR variants and melanoma risk.

resultsWe identified 10 eligible studies that evaluated six VDR variants (Apa1, Bsm1, Cdx2, EcoRV, Fok1, and Taq1) in a total of 4,961 melanoma patients and 4,605 controls. The pooled estimates identified two variants-Fok1 and Bsm1-as significantly associated with melanoma risk, but not for the other four variants Apa1, Cdx2, EcorV and Taq1. For Fok1, the pooled OR was 1.18 (95% CI = 1.06-1.30; I(2) = 22%) for Ff vs. FF and 1.19 (95% CI = 1.01-1.41; I(2) = 0%) for ff vs. FF. The dominant genetic model suggested the allele f carriers showed an 18% (pooled OR = 1.18, 95% CI = 1.07-1.29; I(2) = 0%) increased risk for melanoma compared to homozygote FF. In contrast, the Bsm1 was found to be associated with a decreased risk for melanoma with the pooled OR was 0.85 (95% CI = 0.76-0.95; I(2) = 0%) for Bb vs. bb and 0.83 (95% CI = 0.68-1.00; I(2) = 28%) for BB vs. bb. Under the dominant genetic model, a 15% (pooled OR = 0.85, 95% CI = 0.76-0.94; I(2) = 0%) decrease of melanoma risk was found for those with BB or Bb genotype compared to those of bb genotype.

conclusionsThe VDR variants Fok1 and Bsm1 may influence the susceptibility to developing melanoma, though further studies are needed to verify these conclusions.

Indexed as

Genetic Predisposition to DiseaseHumansMelanomaReceptors, CalcitriolSkin NeoplasmsReceptors, CalcitriolVDR protein, human

Identifiers

PMID25887475
PMCPMC4342192

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.