SynthesisBMC genetics2015
Variants Fok1 and Bsm1 on VDR are associated with the melanoma risk: evidence from the published epidemiological studies.
Synthesis in BMC genetics, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
12 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.
- Vitamin D and melanoma: an umbrella meta-analysis of serum levels, dietary intake, and VDR polymorphisms.Journal of translational medicine · 2026Pooled it
- Role of VDR gene polymorphisms and environmental factors in the development of skin cancers: evidence by updated meta-analysis.Archives of dermatological research · 2025Pooled it
- Differential distribution in vitamin D receptor gene variants and expression profile in Northeast Brazil influences upon active pulmonary tuberculosis.Molecular biology reports · 2020Article
- Vitamin D receptor polymorphisms and melanoma.Oncology letters · 2019Review
- BRCA1/2 mutations are not a common cause of malignant melanoma in the Polish population.PloS one · 2018Article
- Vitamin D status and risk for malignant cutaneous melanoma: recent advances.European journal of cancer prevention : the official journal of the European Cancer Prevention Organisation (ECP) · 2017Review
- Impact of phosphoinositide-3-kinase and vitamin D3 nuclear receptor single-nucleotide polymorphisms on the outcome of malignant melanoma patients.Oncotarget · 2017Article
- BsmI (rs1544410) and FokI (rs2228570) vitamin D receptor polymorphisms, smoking, and body mass index as risk factors of cutaneous malignant melanoma in northeast Italy.Cancer biology & medicine · 2017Article
- Immunohistochemical evaluation of vitamin D receptor (VDR) expression in cutaneous melanoma tissues and four VDR gene polymorphisms.Cancer biology & medicine · 2017Article
- Vitamin D in patients with chronic kidney disease: a position statement of the Working Group "Trace Elements and Mineral Metabolism" of the Italian Society of Nephrology.Journal of nephrology · 2016Review
- Vitamin D Deficiency in Uygurs and Kazaks Is Associated with Polymorphisms in CYP2R1 and DHCR7/NADSYN1 Genes.Medical science monitor : international medical journal of experimental and clinical research · 2015Article
- DHPLC Elution Patterns ofCancer genomics & proteomicsReview
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundThe vitamin D receptor (VDR) mediates the major cellular activities of vitamin D and regulates various signaling pathways implicated in cancer development and progression. VDR variants have been found associated with the risk of developing melanoma; however, previous epidemiological studies are inconsistent. We have systematically reviewed the published epidemiological literature and conducted a meta-analysis to assess associations between common VDR variants and melanoma risk.
resultsWe identified 10 eligible studies that evaluated six VDR variants (Apa1, Bsm1, Cdx2, EcoRV, Fok1, and Taq1) in a total of 4,961 melanoma patients and 4,605 controls. The pooled estimates identified two variants-Fok1 and Bsm1-as significantly associated with melanoma risk, but not for the other four variants Apa1, Cdx2, EcorV and Taq1. For Fok1, the pooled OR was 1.18 (95% CI = 1.06-1.30; I(2) = 22%) for Ff vs. FF and 1.19 (95% CI = 1.01-1.41; I(2) = 0%) for ff vs. FF. The dominant genetic model suggested the allele f carriers showed an 18% (pooled OR = 1.18, 95% CI = 1.07-1.29; I(2) = 0%) increased risk for melanoma compared to homozygote FF. In contrast, the Bsm1 was found to be associated with a decreased risk for melanoma with the pooled OR was 0.85 (95% CI = 0.76-0.95; I(2) = 0%) for Bb vs. bb and 0.83 (95% CI = 0.68-1.00; I(2) = 28%) for BB vs. bb. Under the dominant genetic model, a 15% (pooled OR = 0.85, 95% CI = 0.76-0.94; I(2) = 0%) decrease of melanoma risk was found for those with BB or Bb genotype compared to those of bb genotype.
conclusionsThe VDR variants Fok1 and Bsm1 may influence the susceptibility to developing melanoma, though further studies are needed to verify these conclusions.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.