Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25887461›Full record

ArticleBMC family practice2015

A longitudinal study of the working relationship and return to work: perceptions by clients and occupational therapists in primary health care.

Mona Eklund, Lena-Karin Erlandsson, Birgitta A Wästberg

Registry-linked trialOpen access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC family practice, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT01234961 (Outcomes of the Work Rehabilitation Method Redesigning Daily Occupations), which is not on this map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
2.0field-weighted citation impact, top 12% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT01234961 nacompletednot on this map

Outcomes of the Work Rehabilitation Method Redesigning Daily Occupations (ReDO) - a Quasi-experimental Study Among Women With Stress-related Disorders

TypeinterventionalSponsorLund UniversityRan2007 to 2011Enrolled84ConditionsAdjustment Disorders, Burnout, ProfessionalArmsRedesigning Daily Occupations, Care as usual
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed, 12 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Mona EklundDepartment of Health Sciences, Lund University, PO Box 157, SE-22100, Lund, Sweden. mona.eklund@med.lu.se.
Lena-Karin ErlandssonDepartment of Health Sciences, Lund University, PO Box 157, SE-22100, Lund, Sweden. lena-karin.erlandsson@med.lu.se.
Birgitta A WästbergDepartment of Health Sciences, Lund University, PO Box 157, SE-22100, Lund, Sweden. birgitta.wastberg@skane.se.
Lund University · SE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe working relationship between client and therapist can be important to enhance outcomes from vocational rehabilitation for women with stress-related disorders in primary health care. The aim was to investigate the working relationship, as perceived by clients and therapists in the Redesigning Daily Occupations (ReDO™) program, and its relationships to return to work and satisfaction with the rehabilitation. Another aim was to compare the ReDO™ group and a "care-as-usual" (CAU) group regarding perceptions of the working relationship with the social insurance officer.

methodForty-two ReDO™ clients and 42 matched controls receiving CAU participated. The study included four measurements (baseline, after 16 weeks rehabilitation and follow-ups after 6 and 12 months). 37 + 37 clients completed. Return to work data was obtained from the Social Insurance Offices (SIO), and the working relationship and client satisfaction were assessed by self-report questionnaires.

resultsThe clients rated the working relationship higher than the therapists (mean rating 101.1 vs. 93.9; p < 0.001). The therapists' rating showed a statistically significant association with return to work at the 12-month follow-up, and the clients' perceptions were statistically significantly related to how they rated satisfaction with the rehabilitation received. The ReDO™ and the CAU groups did not differ regarding how they rated the relationship with the SIO officer (mean ratings 83.9 vs. 77; p = 0.189). The working relationship with the SIO officer was not related to return to work, but an association (rs = 0.70, p < 0.001) to client satisfaction at 16 weeks appeared in the CAU group alone.

conclusionThe working relationship as perceived by clients and therapists seemed to be partly separate phenomena, the client perceptions being linked with satisfaction with the rehabilitation and the therapist perceptions with the clients' return to work. The relationship to the SIO officers was of no importance to return to work but was of some significance for satisfaction with the rehabilitation among the CAU clients. Therapists should strive to improve the relationship with clients to whom they feel the relationship is fragile since that might enhance the chances for those clients to return to work.

trial registrationRegistered at ClinicalTrials.gov (identifier NCT01234961) 2 November 2010.

Indexed as

Primary Health CareProfessional-Patient RelationsReturn to WorkAdultFemaleHealth BehaviorHumansLife StyleLongitudinal StudiesMaleMiddle AgedOccupational TherapyRehabilitation, Vocational

Identifiers

PMID25887461
PMCPMC4397877
OpenAlexW2025672605

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.