Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25887421›Full record

ArticleCritical care (London, England)2015

Gender differences in outcome and use of resources do exist in Swedish intensive care, but to no advantage for women of premenopausal age.

Carolina Samuelsson, Folke Sjöberg, Göran Karlström, Thomas Nolin, Sten M Walther

Registry-linked trialAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Critical care (London, England), 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT05513456 (Ethnic and Gender Based Admittance Patterns in the ICU, a Multicenter, International Randomized Survey Study), which is not on this map. Cited by 36 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
36citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT05513456 recruitingnot on this mapstarted 2024, after this paper: background citation

Ethnic and Gender Based Admittance Patterns in the ICU, a Multicenter, International Randomized Survey Study

TypeobservationalSponsorKarolinska InstitutetRan2024 to 2026Enrolled5,000ConditionsCritical Illness, Gender Equality, Discrimination, Sex, Discrimination, RacialArmsRandomization to a different factors in the case descriptions
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

36 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Sex and gender bias in major trauma care: a scoping review.Scandinavian journal of trauma, resuscitation and emergency medicine · 2026
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Observational
  8. Sex matters: Is it time for a SOFA makeover?Critical care (London, England) · 2024
    Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Observational
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Sex Differences in Mortality of ICU Patients According to Diagnosis-related Sex Balance.American journal of respiratory and critical care medicine · 2022
    Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Observational
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Carolina SamuelssonDepartment of Intensive and Perioperative Care, Skåne University Hospital, Malmö and Lund, Inga Marie Nilssons gata 47 pl. 3, SE21428, Malmö, Sweden. carolina.samuelsson@gmail.com.
Folke SjöbergDepartment of Clinical and Experimental Medicine, Faculty of Health Sciences, Linköping University, Linköping, Sweden. folke.sjoberg@liu.se.
Göran KarlströmThe Swedish Intensive Care Registry, Karlstad, Sweden. goran.karlstrom@icuregswe.org.
Thomas NolinDepartment of Anesthesiology and Intensive Care, Kristianstad Central Hospital, Kristianstad, Sweden. nolin.thomas@gmail.com.
Sten M WaltherDivision of Cardiovascular Medicine, Department of Medical and Health Sciences, Linköping University, Linköping, Sweden. sten.walther@telia.com.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionPreclinical data indicate that oestrogen appears to play a beneficial role in the pathophysiology of and recovery from critical illness. In few previous epidemiologic studies, however, have researchers analysed premenopausal women as a separate group when addressing potential gender differences in critical care outcome. Our aim was to see if women of premenopausal age have a better outcome following critical care and to investigate the association between gender and use of intensive care unit (ICU) resources.

methodsOn the basis of our analysis of 127,254 consecutive Simplified Acute Physiology Score III-scored Swedish Intensive Care Registry ICU admissions from 2008 through 2012, we determined the risk-adjusted 30-day mortality, accumulated nurse workload score and ICU length of stay. To investigate associations with sex, we used logistic regression and multivariate analyses on the entire cohort as well as on two subgroups stratified by median age for menopause (up to and including 45 years and older than 45 years) and six selected diagnostic subgroups (sepsis, multiple trauma, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, acute respiratory distress syndrome, pneumonia and cardiac arrest).

resultsThere was no sex difference in risk-adjusted mortality for the cohort as a whole, and there was no sex difference in risk-adjusted mortality in the group 45 years of age and younger. For the group of patients older than 45 years of age, we found a reduced risk-adjusted mortality in men admitted for cardiac arrest. For the cohort as a whole, and for those admitted with multiple trauma, male sex was associated with a higher nurse workload score and a longer ICU stay.

conclusionsUsing information derived from a large multiple ICU register database, we found that premenopausal female sex was not associated with a survival advantage following intensive care in Sweden. When the data were adjusted for age and severity of illness, we found that men used more ICU resources per admission than women did.

Indexed as

Hospital MortalityIntensive Care UnitsPremenopauseTreatment OutcomeAdultAgedAged, 80 and overAge FactorsAPACHECritical CareFemaleHealth ResourcesHumansLength of StayLogistic ModelsMale

Identifiers

PMID25887421
PMCPMC4407397

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.