Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25887325›Full record

ArticleCritical care (London, England)2015

Applicability of pulse pressure variation: how many shades of grey?

Frederic Michard, Denis Chemla, Jean-Louis Teboul

Abstract readEditorialComment
In one paragraph

Article in Critical care (London, England), 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 67 papers, 4 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
67citing papers in PubMed, 4 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

67 citing papers in PubMed, 4 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Guideline
  5. Trial
  6. Trial
  7. Trial
  8. Trial
  9. Observational
  10. Review
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Observational
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Current standard of care for septic shock.Intensive care medicine · 2026
    Review
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Article
  20. Article

7 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Frederic MichardEdwards Lifesciences, 1 Edwards Way, Irvine, CA, USA. frederic.michard@bluewin.ch.
Denis ChemlaPhysiology department-INSERM U999, CHU de Bicêtre, Université Paris Sud, 78 rue du Général Leclerc, 94270, le Kremlin Bicêtre, France. Denis.chemla@bct.aphp.fr.
Jean-Louis TeboulMedical ICU, CHU de Bicêtre, Université Paris Sud, 78 rue du Général Leclerc, 94270, le Kremlin Bicêtre, France. Jean-louis.teboul@bct.aphp.fr.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

PubMed holds no abstract for this paper.

Indexed as

Blood PressureFluid TherapyRespiration, ArtificialFemaleHumansMale

Identifiers

PMID25887325
PMCPMC4372274

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.