Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25887320›Full record

ReviewBreast cancer research : BCR2015

The clinical and functional significance of c-Met in breast cancer: a review.

Colan M Ho-Yen, J Louise Jones, Stephanie Kermorgant

Open access · goldAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Breast cancer research : BCR, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 110 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
110citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
9.4field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

110 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 192 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Trial
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article

50 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Colan M Ho-YenDepartment of Cellular Pathology, St George's Healthcare NHS Trust, Blackshaw Road, Tooting, London, SW17 0QT, UK. Colan.HoYen@stgeorges.nhs.uk.
J Louise JonesCentre for Tumour Biology, Barts Cancer Institute, Charterhouse Square, London, EC1M 6BQ, UK. l.j.jones@qmul.ac.uk.
Stephanie KermorgantCentre for Tumour Biology, Barts Cancer Institute, Charterhouse Square, London, EC1M 6BQ, UK. s.kermorgant@qmul.ac.uk.
St George’s University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust · GB

Funding

Cancer Research UKMedical Research Council G0501003
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

c-Met is a receptor tyrosine kinase that upon binding of its ligand, hepatocyte growth factor (HGF), activates downstream pathways with diverse cellular functions that are important in organ development and cancer progression. Anomalous c-Met signalling has been described in a variety of cancer types, and the receptor is regarded as a novel therapeutic target. In breast cancer there is a need to develop new treatments, particularly for the aggressive subtypes such as triple-negative and basal-like cancer, which currently lack targeted therapy. Over the last two decades, much has been learnt about the functional role of c-Met signalling in different models of breast development and cancer. This work has been complemented by clinical studies, establishing the prognostic significance of c-Met in tissue samples of breast cancer. While the clinical trials of anti-c-Met therapy in advanced breast cancer progress, there is a need to review the existing evidence so that the potential of these treatments can be better appreciated. The aim of this article is to examine the role of HGF/c-Met signalling in in vitro and in vivo models of breast cancer, to describe the mechanisms of aberrant c-Met signalling in human tissues, and to give a brief overview of the anti-c-Met therapies currently being evaluated in breast cancer patients. We will show that the HGF/c-Met pathway is associated with breast cancer progression and suggest that there is a firm basis for continued development of anti-c-Met treatment, particularly for patients with basal-like and triple-negative breast cancer.

Indexed as

Signal TransductionAnimalsAntineoplastic AgentsBreast NeoplasmsCell Transformation, NeoplasticDisease Models, AnimalFemaleHepatocyte Growth FactorHumansMolecular Targeted TherapyPrognosisProtein BindingProtein Kinase InhibitorsProto-Oncogene Proteins c-metTriple Negative Breast NeoplasmsAntineoplastic AgentsHepatocyte Growth FactorProtein Kinase InhibitorsProto-Oncogene Proteins c-met

Identifiers

PMID25887320
PMCPMC4389345
OpenAlexW2104013286

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.