SynthesisCritical care (London, England)2015
Nebulized antibiotics for ventilator-associated pneumonia: a systematic review and meta-analysis.
Synthesis in Critical care (London, England), 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 37 papers, 5 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
37 citing papers in PubMed, 5 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.
- Guideline
- Inhaled antibiotics for treating pneumonia in invasively ventilated patients in intensive care unit: a meta-analysis of randomized clinical trials with trial sequential analysis.Critical care (London, England) · 2024Pooled it
- A systematic review of antimicrobial therapy in children with tracheostomies.Pediatric pulmonology · 2024Pooled it
- Amikacin nebulization for the adjunctive therapy of gram-negative pneumonia in mechanically ventilated patients: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.Scientific reports · 2021Pooled it
- Antimicrobials for the treatment of drug-resistant Acinetobacter baumannii pneumonia in critically ill patients: a systemic review and Bayesian network meta-analysis.Critical care (London, England) · 2017Pooled it
- Comparing inhaled colistin with inhaled fosfomycin/tobramycin as an adjunctive treatment for ventilator-associated pneumonia: An open-label randomized controlled trial.The clinical respiratory journal · 2023Trial
- Practices and Perceptions of Infectious Diseases and Critical Care Clinicians Regarding Aerosolized Antimicrobial Therapy in the State of Qatar: A Multicenter Cross-Sectional Study.Antibiotics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
- Efficacy of inhaled antibiotics in children with ventilator-associated pneumonia: A systematic review and meta-analysis.Journal of critical care medicine (Universitatea de Medicina si Farmacie din Targu-Mures) · 2026Review
- Nebulized Antibiotics for Preventing and Treating Gram-Negative Respiratory Infections in Critically Ill Patients: An Overview of Reviews.Antibiotics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Review
- Problematic meta-analyses: Bayesian and frequentist perspectives on combining randomized controlled trials and non-randomized studies.BMC medical research methodology · 2024Article
- Impact of gas humidification and nebulizer position under invasive ventilation: preclinical comparative study of regional aerosol deposition.Scientific reports · 2023Article
- Adjunctive inhaled amikacin in infants with Ventilator-Associated Pneumonia optimizes the complex antimicrobial therapy: pilot study.Acta bio-medica : Atenei Parmensis · 2023Article
- Incidence and associated risk factors for systemic drug levels with inhaled aminoglycoside therapy.The Journal of antimicrobial chemotherapy · 2023Article
- Ventilator-associated pneumonia in critically ill patients with COVID-19 infection: a narrative review.ERJ open research · 2022Review
- The Unfulfilled Promise of Inhaled Therapy in Ventilator-Associated Infections: Where Do We Go from Here?Journal of aerosol medicine and pulmonary drug delivery · 2022Review
- A short synthetic peptide, based on LyeTx I from Lycosa erythrognatha venom, shows potential to treat pneumonia caused by carbapenem-resistant Acinetobacter baumannii without detectable resistance.The Journal of antibiotics · 2021Article
- Optimizing Antimicrobial Drug Dosing in Critically Ill Patients.Microorganisms · 2021Review
- Inhaled antibiotics during mechanical ventilation-why it will work.Annals of translational medicine · 2021Review
- Administration of dry powders during respiratory supports.Annals of translational medicine · 2021Review
- Efficacy of Chinese Herbal Injections for Elderly Patients With pneumonia-A Bayesian Network Meta-analysis of Randomized Control Trials.Frontiers in pharmacology · 2021Article
Corrections and comments
- Commented on by
- Commented on by
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
introductionNebulized antibiotics are a promising new treatment option for ventilator-associated pneumonia. However, more evidence of the benefit of this therapy is required.
methodsThe Medline, Scopus, EMBASE, Biological Abstracts, CAB Abstracts, Food Science and Technology Abstracts, CENTRAL, Scielo and Lilacs databases were searched to identify randomized controlled trials or matched observational studies that compared nebulized antibiotics with or without intravenous antibiotics to intravenous antibiotics alone for ventilator-associated pneumonia treatment. Two reviewers independently collected data and assessed outcomes and risk of bias. The primary outcome was clinical cure. Secondary outcomes were microbiological cure, ICU and hospital mortality, duration of mechanical ventilation, ICU length of stay and adverse events. A mixed-effect model meta-analysis was performed. Trial sequential analysis was used for the main outcome of interest.
resultsTwelve studies were analyzed, including six randomized controlled trials. For the main outcome analysis, 812 patients were included. Nebulized antibiotics were associated with higher rates of clinical cure (risk ratio (RR) = 1.23; 95% confidence interval (CI), 1.05 to 1.43; I(2) = 34%; D(2) = 45%). Nebulized antibiotics were not associated with microbiological cure (RR = 1.24; 95% CI, 0.95 to 1.62; I(2) = 62.5), mortality (RR = 0.90; CI 95%, 0.76 to 1.08; I(2) = 0%), duration of mechanical ventilation (standardized mean difference = -0.10 days; 95% CI, -1.22 to 1.00; I(2) = 96.5%), ICU length of stay (standardized mean difference = 0.14 days; 95% CI, -0.46 to 0.73; I(2) = 89.2%) or renal toxicity (RR = 1.05; 95% CI, 0.70 to 1.57; I(2) = 15.6%). Regarding the primary outcome, the number of patients included was below the information size required for a definitive conclusion by trial sequential analysis; therefore, our results regarding this parameter are inconclusive.
conclusionsNebulized antibiotics seem to be associated with higher rates of clinical cure in the treatment of ventilator-associated pneumonia. However, the apparent benefit in the clinical cure rate observed by traditional meta-analysis does not persist after trial sequential analysis. Additional high-quality studies on this subject are highly warranted. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: CRD42014009116 . Registered 29 March 2014.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.