Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25887104›Full record

ArticleCritical care (London, England)2015

Perceptions of the appropriateness of care in California adult intensive care units.

Matthew H Anstey, John L Adams, Elizabeth A McGlynn

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Critical care (London, England), 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 23 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
23citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

23 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Futility considerations in surgical ethics.Annals of medicine and surgery (2012) · 2023
    Article
  9. Article
  10. Addressing Futility: A Practical Approach.Critical care explorations · 2022
    Review
  11. Change in inappropriate critical care over time.Journal of critical care · 2020
    Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Back pain occurrence and treatment-seeking behavior among nurses: the role of work-related emotional burden.Quality of life research : an international journal of quality of life aspects of treatment, care and rehabilitation · 2020
    Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Observational
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Matthew H AnsteyCommonwealth Fund 2012-13 Harkness Fellow, Kaiser Permanente Oakland, 1 Kaiser Plaza, Oakland, 94612, CA, USA. matthew.anstey@health.wa.gov.au.
John L AdamsCenter for Effectiveness & Safety Research, 100 S. Los Robles, 3rd Floor, Pasadena, CA, 91101, USA. john.l.adams@kp.org.
Elizabeth A McGlynnCenter for Effectiveness & Safety Research, 100 S. Los Robles, 3rd Floor, Pasadena, CA, 91101, USA. elizabeth.a.mcglynn@kp.org.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionIncreased demand for expensive intensive care unit (ICU) services may contribute to rising health-care costs. A focus on appropriate use may offer a clinically meaningful way of finding the balance. We aimed to determine the extent and characteristics of perceived inappropriate treatment among ICU doctors and nurses, defined as an imbalance between the amount or intensity of treatments being provided and the patient's expected prognosis or wishes.

methodsThis was a cross-sectional study of doctors and nurses providing care to patients in 56 adult ICUs in California between May and August 2013. In total, 1,363 doctors and nurses completed an anonymous electronic survey.

resultsThirty-eight percent of 1,169 respondents (95% confidence interval (CI) 35% to 41%, 51.1% of physicians and 35.8% of nurses) identified at least one patient as receiving inappropriate treatment. Respondents most commonly reported that the amount of treatment provided was disproportionate to the patient's expected prognosis or wishes-325 out of 429 (76%, 95% CI 72% to 80%)--and that treatment was 'too much' in 93% of cases. Factors associated with perceived inappropriateness of treatment were the belief that death in their ICU is seen as a failure (odds ratio (OR) 5.75, 95% CI 2.28 to 14.53, P = 0.000), profession (doctors more than nurses) (OR 2.50, 95% CI 1.58 to 3.97, P = 0.000), lack of collaboration between doctors and nurses (OR 1.84, 95% CI 1.21 to 2.80, P = 0.004), intent to leave their job (OR 1.73, 95% CI 1.18 to 2.55, P = 0.005), and the perceived responsibility to control health-care costs (OR 1.57, 95% CI 1.05 to 2.33, P = 0.026). Providers supported formal communication training (90%, 95% CI 88% to 92%) and mandatory family meetings (89%, 95% CI 87% to 91%) as potential solutions to reduce the provision of inappropriate treatment.

conclusionsDoctors and nurses working in California ICUs frequently perceive treatment to be inappropriate. They also identified measures that could reduce the provision of inappropriate treatment.

Indexed as

Attitude of Health PersonnelAdultBurnout, ProfessionalCaliforniaCross-Sectional StudiesFemaleHumansIntensive Care UnitsMaleSurveys and QuestionnairesTerminal CareUnnecessary ProceduresWorkforce

Identifiers

PMID25887104
PMCPMC4344807

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.