Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25886958›Full record

Trial reportBMC musculoskeletal disorders2015

A multi-centre randomized controlled trial comparing arthroscopic osteochondroplasty and lavage with arthroscopic lavage alone on patient important outcomes and quality of life in the treatment of young adult (18-50) femoroacetabular impingement.

FIRST Investigators

Registry-linked trialOpen access · goldAbstract readMulticenter StudyRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in BMC musculoskeletal disorders, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT01623843 (Femoroacetabular Impingement RandomiSed Controlled Trial), which is not on this map. Cited by 18 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
18citing papers in PubMed
5.3field-weighted citation impact, top 4% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT01623843 nacompletednot on this map

Femoroacetabular Impingement RandomiSed Controlled Trial (FIRST); Sub-study: Femoroacetabular Impingement RandomiSed Controlled Trial With an Embedded Prospective Cohort (FIRST-EPIC)

TypeinterventionalSponsorMcMaster UniversityRan2012 to 2020Enrolled220ConditionsFemoroacetabular ImpingementArmsArthroscopic Lavage, Arthroscopic Osteochondroplasty
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

18 citing papers in PubMed, 36 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Trial
  3. Trial
  4. Trial
  5. Trial
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. The evolution of femoroacetabular impingement surgical management as a model for introducing new surgical techniques.Knee surgery, sports traumatology, arthroscopy : official journal of the ESSKA · 2020
    Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Authorship in the field of femoroacetabular impingement: an analysis of journal publications.Knee surgery, sports traumatology, arthroscopy : official journal of the ESSKA · 2017
    Article
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author at 1 institution in 1 country.

FIRST Investigators
McMaster University · CA

Funding

Canadian Institutes of Health Research
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundSeveral cross-sectional studies have estimated that the prevalence of femoroacetabular impingement (FAI) ranges from 14-17% among asymptomatic young adults to almost 95% among competitive athletes. With FAI, there is abnormal contact between the proximal femur and the acetabulum, resulting in abnormal mechanics with terminal motion such as hip flexion and rotation. This condition results from bony anomalies of the acetabular rim (Pincer) and or femoral head/neck junction (CAM) and typically causes hip pain and decreased hip function. The development of hip pain potentially serves as an indicator for early cartilage and labral damage that may result in hip osteoarthritis. Although surgical correction of the misshaped bony anatomy and associated intra-articular soft tissue damage of the hip is thought to improve hip pain and alter the natural history of degenerative disease, the supportive evidence is based upon low quality observational studies. The Femoroacetabular Impingement RandomiSed controlled Trial (FIRST) compares outcomes following surgical correction of the impingement morphology (arthroscopic osteochondroplasty) with/without labral repair versus arthroscopic lavage of the hip joint in adults aged 18 to 50 diagnosed with FAI. METHODS AND

designFIRST is a multi-centre, randomized controlled trial with a sample size of 220 patients. Exclusion criteria include the presence of hip syndromes, previous surgery or trauma to the affected hip, and significant medical comorbidities. The primary outcome is pain and the secondary outcomes include patient function, quality of life, complications, and cost-effectiveness--all within one year of follow-up. Patients are stratified based on centre and impingement sub-type. Patients, outcome assessors, data analysts, and the Steering Committee are blinded to surgical allocation. Using an intention-to-treat approach, outcome analyses will be performed using an analysis of covariance and descriptive statistics. DISCUSSION: Symptomatic FAI is associated with chronic hip pain, functional limitations, and secondary osteoarthritis. Therefore, optimizing treatment has the potential to improve the lives millions of young, active persons who are diagnosed with this condition. Few orthopaedic surgical trials have similar potential to shift the paradigm of care dramatically towards (or away) from surgical bony and soft tissue interventions.

trial registrationThe FIRST trial is registered with clinicaltrials.gov (NCT01623843).

Indexed as

AdolescentAdultArthralgiaArthroscopyBiomechanical PhenomenaCost-Benefit AnalysisFemaleFemoracetabular ImpingementHip JointHumansMaleMiddle AgedPrevalenceQuality of LifeRange of Motion, ArticularSingle-Blind Method

Identifiers

PMID25886958
PMCPMC4387581
OpenAlexW122890298

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.