ArticleCritical care (London, England)2015
2015, big data in healthcare: for whom the bell tolls?
Article in Critical care (London, England), 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
6 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.
- Secondary use of standardized nursing care data for advancing nursing science and practice: a systematic review.Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association : JAMIA · 2019Pooled it
- Evidence of Progress in Making Nursing Practice Visible Using Standardized Nursing Data: a Systematic Review.AMIA ... Annual Symposium proceedings. AMIA Symposium · 2017Pooled it
- Are Randomized Controlled Trials the (G)old Standard? From Clinical Intelligence to Prescriptive Analytics.Journal of medical Internet research · 2016Article
- Scalable Predictive Analysis in Critically Ill Patients Using a Visual Open Data Analysis Platform.PloS one · 2016Article
- Acetaminophen in critically ill patients, a therapy in search for big data analytics.Journal of thoracic disease · 2016Article
- Creating a Common Data Model for Comparative Effectiveness with the Observational Medical Outcomes Partnership.Applied clinical informatics · 2015Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
PubMed holds no abstract for this paper.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.