Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25886903›Full record

ArticleBone2015

A distinct regulatory region of the Bmp5 locus activates gene expression following adult bone fracture or soft tissue injury.

Catherine A Guenther, Zhen Wang, Emma Li, Misha C Tran, Catriona Y Logan, Roel Nusse, Luiz Pantalena-Filho, George P Yang, David M Kingsley

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Bone, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 31 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
31citing papers in PubMed
2.2field-weighted citation impact, top 13% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

31 citing papers in PubMed, 41 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Enhancer-directed gene delivery for digit regeneration based on conserved epidermal factors.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2026
    Article
  2. Identification of GLDNInternational journal of oral science · 2026
    Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Regulation of chromatin organization during animal regeneration.Cell regeneration (London, England) · 2023
    Review
  11. Article
  12. Regeneration enhancers: a field in development.American journal of physiology. Cell physiology · 2022
    Review
  13. Imaginal Disc Regeneration: Something Old, Something New.Cold Spring Harbor perspectives in biology · 2022
    Review
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Application of BMP in Bone Tissue Engineering.Frontiers in bioengineering and biotechnology · 2022
    Review
  17. Effects of bone morphogenetic proteins on epithelial repair.Experimental biology and medicine (Maywood, N.J.) · 2021
    Review
  18. Article
  19. Molecular biology of meniscus pathology: Lessons learned from translational studies and mouse models.Journal of orthopaedic research : official publication of the Orthopaedic Research Society · 2020
    Review
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Catherine A GuentherDepartment of Developmental Biology, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, CA, USA; Howard Hughes Medical Institute, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, CA, USA.
Zhen WangDepartment of Surgery, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, CA, USA.
Emma LiDepartment of Developmental Biology, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, CA, USA; Howard Hughes Medical Institute, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, CA, USA.
Misha C TranDepartment of Surgery, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, CA, USA.
Catriona Y LoganDepartment of Developmental Biology, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, CA, USA; Howard Hughes Medical Institute, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, CA, USA.
Roel NusseDepartment of Developmental Biology, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, CA, USA; Howard Hughes Medical Institute, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, CA, USA.
Luiz Pantalena-FilhoDepartment of Developmental Biology, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, CA, USA.
George P YangDepartment of Surgery, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, CA, USA; Veterans Affairs Palo Alto Health Care System, Palo Alto, CA, USA. Electronic address: gpyang@stanford.edu.
David M KingsleyDepartment of Developmental Biology, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, CA, USA; Howard Hughes Medical Institute, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, CA, USA. Electronic address: kingsley@stanford.edu.
Stanford University · USHoward Hughes Medical Institute · US

Funding

Genetic Analysis of Bone Morphogenic ProteinsR37AR042236 · NIAMS · STANFORD UNIVERSITY · PI KINGSLEY, DAVID M · 2002 to 2011
$3.4M
GENETIC ANALYSIS OF BONE MORPHOGENETIC PROTEINSR01AR042236 · NIAMS · STANFORD UNIVERSITY · PI KINGSLEY, DAVID M · 1993 to 2001
$915k
Howard Hughes Medical InstituteHoward Hughes Medical Institute 57007723NIAMS NIH HHS AR42236NIAMS NIH HHS R01 AR042236NIAMS NIH HHS R37 AR042236
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Bone morphogenetic proteins (BMPs) are key signaling molecules required for normal development of bones and other tissues. Previous studies have shown that null mutations in the mouse Bmp5 gene alter the size, shape and number of multiple bone and cartilage structures during development. Bmp5 mutations also delay healing of rib fractures in adult mutants, suggesting that the same signals used to pattern embryonic bone and cartilage are also reused during skeletal regeneration and repair. Despite intense interest in BMPs as agents for stimulating bone formation in clinical applications, little is known about the regulatory elements that control developmental or injury-induced BMP expression. To compare the DNA sequences that activate gene expression during embryonic bone formation and following acute injuries in adult animals, we assayed regions surrounding the Bmp5 gene for their ability to stimulate lacZ reporter gene expression in transgenic mice. Multiple genomic fragments, distributed across the Bmp5 locus, collectively coordinate expression in discrete anatomic domains during normal development, including in embryonic ribs. In contrast, a distinct regulatory region activated expression following rib fracture in adult animals. The same injury control region triggered gene expression in mesenchymal cells following tibia fracture, in migrating keratinocytes following dorsal skin wounding, and in regenerating epithelial cells following lung injury. The Bmp5 gene thus contains an "injury response" control region that is distinct from embryonic enhancers, and that is activated by multiple types of injury in adult animals.

Indexed as

Regulatory Sequences, Nucleic AcidAnimalsBone Morphogenetic Protein 5Fractures, BoneGene ExpressionHumansMaleMice, TransgenicSoft Tissue InjuriesBmp5 protein, mouseBone Morphogenetic Protein 5Bmp5Bone fractureDevelopmental enhancerGene regulationInjury response

Identifiers

PMID25886903
PMCPMC4447581
OpenAlexW2028893533

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.