Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25886746›Full record

Trial reportBMC musculoskeletal disorders2015

Comparing parecoxib and ketorolac as preemptive analgesia in patients undergoing posterior lumbar spinal fusion: a prospective randomized double-blinded placebo-controlled trial.

Koopong Siribumrungwong, Julin Cheewakidakarn, Boonsin Tangtrakulwanich, Sasikaan Nimmaanrat

Registry-linked trialOpen access · goldAbstract readRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in BMC musculoskeletal disorders, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT01859585 (Comparing the Efficacy of Parecoxib and Ketorolac as Preemptive Analgesia in Patients Undergoing Posterior Lumbar Spinal Fusion), which is not on this map. Cited by 15 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
15citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
4.1field-weighted citation impact, top 6% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT01859585 phase4completednot on this map

Comparing the Efficacy of Parecoxib and Ketorolac as Preemptive Analgesia in Patients Undergoing Posterior Lumbar Spinal Fusion

TypeinterventionalSponsorPrince of Songkla UniversityRan2011 to 2013Enrolled96ConditionsPostoperative PainArmsParecoxib, Ketorolac
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

15 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 54 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Moving Past Anti-VEGF: Novel Therapies for Treating Diabetic Retinopathy.International journal of molecular sciences · 2016
    Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Koopong SiribumrungwongDepartment of Orthopedic Surgery and Physical Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, Prince of Songkla University, Songkla, Hat Yai, 90110, Thailand. koopongs@hotmail.com.
Julin CheewakidakarnDepartment of Orthopedic Surgery and Physical Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, Prince of Songkla University, Songkla, Hat Yai, 90110, Thailand. chulin_c@hotmail.com.
Boonsin TangtrakulwanichDepartment of Orthopedic Surgery and Physical Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, Prince of Songkla University, Songkla, Hat Yai, 90110, Thailand. boonsin.b@psu.ac.th.
Sasikaan NimmaanratDepartment of Anesthesiology, Faculty of Medicine, Prince of Songkla University, Songkla, Hat Yai, 90110, Thailand. snimmaanrat@yahoo.com.
Prince of Songkla University · TH

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundPoor postoperative pain control is frequently associated with complications and delayed discharge from a hospital. Preemptive analgesia is one of the methods suggested for reducing postoperative pain. Opioids are effective for pain control, but there known addictive properties make physicians cautious about using them. Parecoxib and ketorolac are potent non-opioid NSAIDs that are attractive alternative drugs to opioids to avoid opioid-related side effects. However, there are no good head-to-head comparisons between these two drugs in the aspect of preemptive analgesic effects in lumbar spinal fusion surgery. This study aimed to compare the efficacy in terms of postoperative pain control and safety of parecoxib with ketorolac as preemptive analgesia in posterior lumbar spinal fusion patients.

methodsA prospective, double-blinded randomized controlled trial was carried out in patients undergoing posterior lumbar spinal fusion, who were randomized into 3 groups (n = 32). Parecoxib, ketorolac or a placebo was given to each patient via injection around 30 minutes prior to incision. The efficacy of postoperative pain control was assessed by a verbal numerical rating score (0-10). And various postoperative things were monitored for analysis, such as total opioid consumption, complications, and estimated blood loss.

resultsBoth the ketorolac and parecoxib groups showed significantly better early postoperative pain reduction at the postanesthesia care unit (PACU) than the control group (p < 0.05). There were no differences between the pain scores of ketorolac and parecoxib at any time points. Complications and bleeding were not significantly different between all three groups.

conclusionsPreemptive analgesia using both ketorolac and parecoxib showed a significantly better early postoperative pain control in the PACU than the control group in patients undergoing lumbar spinal fusion.

trial registrationClinicalTrials.gov NCT01859585. Registered 15 May 2013.

Indexed as

Spinal FusionAdultAgedAnalgesics, Non-NarcoticAnti-Inflammatory Agents, Non-SteroidalDouble-Blind MethodDyspepsiaFemaleHumansIncidenceInjections, IntravenousIsoxazolesKetorolacLumbar VertebraeMaleMiddle AgedAnalgesics, Non-NarcoticAnti-Inflammatory Agents, Non-SteroidalIsoxazolesKetorolacparecoxib

Identifiers

PMID25886746
PMCPMC4369094
OpenAlexW2041053001

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.