Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25886734›Full record

ArticleBMC bioinformatics2015

Extraction of relations between genes and diseases from text and large-scale data analysis: implications for translational research.

Àlex Bravo, Janet Piñero, Núria Queralt-Rosinach, Michael Rautschka, Laura I Furlong

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC bioinformatics, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 98 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
98citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

98 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Large language models for bioinformatics.Quantitative biology (Beijing, China) · 2026
    Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Transformers and large language models in healthcare: A review.Artificial intelligence in medicine · 2024
    Review
  19. Article
  20. Article

38 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Àlex BravoResearch Programme on Biomedical Informatics (GRIB), IMIM, DCEXS, Universitat Pompeu Fabra, Barcelona, Spain. abravo@imim.es.
Janet PiñeroResearch Programme on Biomedical Informatics (GRIB), IMIM, DCEXS, Universitat Pompeu Fabra, Barcelona, Spain. jpinero@imim.es.
Núria Queralt-RosinachResearch Programme on Biomedical Informatics (GRIB), IMIM, DCEXS, Universitat Pompeu Fabra, Barcelona, Spain. nqueralt@imim.es.
Michael RautschkaResearch Programme on Biomedical Informatics (GRIB), IMIM, DCEXS, Universitat Pompeu Fabra, Barcelona, Spain. rautschy@gmail.com.
Laura I FurlongResearch Programme on Biomedical Informatics (GRIB), IMIM, DCEXS, Universitat Pompeu Fabra, Barcelona, Spain. lfurlong@imim.es.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundCurrent biomedical research needs to leverage and exploit the large amount of information reported in scientific publications. Automated text mining approaches, in particular those aimed at finding relationships between entities, are key for identification of actionable knowledge from free text repositories. We present the BeFree system aimed at identifying relationships between biomedical entities with a special focus on genes and their associated diseases.

resultsBy exploiting morpho-syntactic information of the text, BeFree is able to identify gene-disease, drug-disease and drug-target associations with state-of-the-art performance. The application of BeFree to real-case scenarios shows its effectiveness in extracting information relevant for translational research. We show the value of the gene-disease associations extracted by BeFree through a number of analyses and integration with other data sources. BeFree succeeds in identifying genes associated to a major cause of morbidity worldwide, depression, which are not present in other public resources. Moreover, large-scale extraction and analysis of gene-disease associations, and integration with current biomedical knowledge, provided interesting insights on the kind of information that can be found in the literature, and raised challenges regarding data prioritization and curation. We found that only a small proportion of the gene-disease associations discovered by using BeFree is collected in expert-curated databases. Thus, there is a pressing need to find alternative strategies to manual curation, in order to review, prioritize and curate text-mining data and incorporate it into domain-specific databases. We present our strategy for data prioritization and discuss its implications for supporting biomedical research and applications.

conclusionsBeFree is a novel text mining system that performs competitively for the identification of gene-disease, drug-disease and drug-target associations. Our analyses show that mining only a small fraction of MEDLINE results in a large dataset of gene-disease associations, and only a small proportion of this dataset is actually recorded in curated resources (2%), raising several issues on data prioritization and curation. We propose that joint analysis of text mined data with data curated by experts appears as a suitable approach to both assess data quality and highlight novel and interesting information.

Indexed as

Information Storage and RetrievalMEDLINEPublicationsTranslational Research, BiomedicalDatabases, FactualData MiningDepressionDiseaseHumansKnowledge Bases

Identifiers

PMID25886734
PMCPMC4466840

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.