Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25886692›Full record

ArticleACS applied materials & interfaces2015

Dual-stimuli-responsive microparticles.

Ekaterina Sokolovskaya, Sahar Rahmani, Asish C Misra, Stefan Bräse, Joerg Lahann

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in ACS applied materials & interfaces, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
12citing papers in PubMed
4.0field-weighted citation impact, top 6% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

12 citing papers in PubMed, 47 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Tumor-Targeted Delivery Therapy Based on PLGA Nanoparticles.Journal of functional biomaterials · 2026
    Review
  2. Article
  3. Protein Nanoparticles: Uniting the Power of Proteins with Engineering Design Approaches.Advanced science (Weinheim, Baden-Wurttemberg, Germany) · 2022
    Review
  4. Article
  5. Targeting gliomas with STAT3-silencing nanoparticles.Molecular & cellular oncology · 2021
    Article
  6. Stimulus-Responsive Nanomedicines for Disease Diagnosis and Treatment.International journal of molecular sciences · 2020
    Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. ROS-responsive drug delivery systems for biomedical applications.Asian journal of pharmaceutical sciences · 2018
    Review
  11. Engineering of nanoparticle size via electrohydrodynamic jetting.Bioengineering & translational medicine · 2016
    Article
  12. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.

Ekaterina Sokolovskaya
Sahar Rahmani‡Biointerfaces Institute and Departments of Biomedical Engineering and Chemical Engineering, University of Michigan 2800 Plymouth Road, Ann Arbor, Michigan 48109, United States.
Asish C Misra‡Biointerfaces Institute and Departments of Biomedical Engineering and Chemical Engineering, University of Michigan 2800 Plymouth Road, Ann Arbor, Michigan 48109, United States.
Stefan Bräse§Institute of Organic Chemistry, Karlsruhe Institute of Technology, Campus Süd, D-76131 Karlsruhe, Germany.
Joerg Lahann‡Biointerfaces Institute and Departments of Biomedical Engineering and Chemical Engineering, University of Michigan 2800 Plymouth Road, Ann Arbor, Michigan 48109, United States.
University of Michigan–Ann Arbor · USBioSurfaces (United States) · USKarlsruhe Institute of Technology · DE

Funding

Tissue Engineering and RegenerationT32DE007057 · NIDCR · UNIVERSITY OF MICHIGAN AT ANN ARBOR · PI DAVID H. KOHN · 1985 to 2026
$17.3M
NIDCR NIH HHS T32 DE007057
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The need for smart materials in the area of biotechnology has fueled the development of numerous stimuli-responsive polymers. Many of these polymers are responsive to pH, light, temperature, or oxidative stress, and yet very few are responsive toward multiple stimuli. Here we report on the synthesis of a novel dual-stimuli-responsive poly(ethylene glycol)-based polymer capable of changing its hydrophilic properties upon treatment with UV light (exogenous stimulus) and markers of oxidative stress (endogenous stimulus). From this polymer, smart microparticles and fibers were fabricated and their responses to either stimulus separately and in conjunction were examined. Comparison of the degradation kinetics demonstrated that the polymer became water-soluble only after both oxidation and irradiation with UV light, which resulted in selective degradation of the corresponding particles. Furthermore, in vitro experiments demonstrated successful uptake of these particles by Raw 264.7 cells. Such dual-stimuli-responsive particles could have potential applications in drug delivery, imaging, and tissue engineering.

Indexed as

MicrospheresUltraviolet RaysAnimalsEndocytosisLactic AcidMiceOxidation-ReductionPolyethylene GlycolsPolyglycolic AcidPolylactic Acid-Polyglycolic Acid CopolymerPolymerizationRAW 264.7 CellsLactic AcidPolyethylene GlycolsPolyglycolic AcidPolylactic Acid-Polyglycolic Acid Copolymeranisotropic particleselectrohydrodynamic cojettingmicroparticlesmultifunctional poly(ethylene glycol)stimuli responsive materials

Identifiers

PMID25886692
PMCPMC5665401
OpenAlexW2329463395

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.