Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25886642›Full record

ArticleBiology direct2015

Structure based approach for understanding organism specific recognition of protein-RNA complexes.

Raju Nagarajan, Sonia Pankaj Chothani, Chandrasekaran Ramakrishnan, Masakazu Sekijima, M Michael Gromiha

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Biology direct, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
2.0field-weighted citation impact, top 14% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed, 17 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 3 institutions in 3 countries.

Raju NagarajanDepartment of Biotechnology, Bhupat Jyoti Metha School of Biosciences, Indian Institute of Technology Madras, Chennai, 600036, Tamilnadu, India. nagabioinfostar@gmail.com.
Sonia Pankaj ChothaniDepartment of Biotechnology, Bhupat Jyoti Metha School of Biosciences, Indian Institute of Technology Madras, Chennai, 600036, Tamilnadu, India. sonya2611@gmail.com.
Chandrasekaran RamakrishnanDepartment of Biotechnology, Bhupat Jyoti Metha School of Biosciences, Indian Institute of Technology Madras, Chennai, 600036, Tamilnadu, India. ramki.rpcr@gmail.com.
Masakazu SekijimaGlobal Scientific Information and Computing Center (GSIC), Tokyo Institute of Technology, 2-12-1 Ookayama, Meguro-ku, Tokyo, 152-8550, Japan. sekijima@gsic.titech.ac.jp.
M Michael GromihaDepartment of Biotechnology, Bhupat Jyoti Metha School of Biosciences, Indian Institute of Technology Madras, Chennai, 600036, Tamilnadu, India. gromiha@iitm.ac.in.
Indian Institute of Technology Madras · INPhilips (United States) · USTokyo Institute of Technology · JP

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundProtein-RNA interactions perform diverse functions within the cell. Understanding the recognition mechanism of protein-RNA complexes has been a challenging task in molecular and computational biology. In earlier works, the recognition mechanisms have been studied for a specific complex or using a set of non-redundant complexes. In this work, we have constructed 18 sets of same protein-RNA complexes belonging to different organisms from Protein Data Bank (PDB). The similarities and differences in each set of complexes have been revealed in terms of various sequence and structure based features such as root mean square deviation, sequence homology, propensity of binding site residues, variance, conservation at binding sites, binding segments, binding motifs of amino acid residues and nucleotides, preferred amino acid-nucleotide pairs and influence of neighboring residues for binding.

resultsWe found that the proteins of mesophilic organisms have more number of binding sites than thermophiles and the binding propensities of amino acid residues are distinct in E. coli, H. sapiens, S. cerevisiae, thermophiles and archaea. Proteins prefer to bind with RNA using a single residue segment in all the organisms while RNA prefers to use a stretch of up to six nucleotides for binding with proteins. We have developed amino acid residue-nucleotide pair potentials for different organisms, which could be used for predicting the binding specificity. Further, molecular dynamics simulation studies on aspartyl tRNA synthetase complexed with aspartyl tRNA showed specific modes of recognition in E. coli, T. thermophilus and S. cerevisiae.

conclusionBased on structural analysis and molecular dynamics simulations we suggest that the mode of recognition depends on the type of the organism in a protein-RNA complex.

Indexed as

Amino Acid MotifsAmino AcidsBinding SitesComputational BiologyCrystallizationDatabases, ProteinEscherichia coliHumansMolecular Dynamics SimulationNucleotidesPeptidesProtein BindingRNARNA-Binding ProteinsSaccharomyces cerevisiaeSpecies SpecificityAmino AcidsNucleotidesPeptidesRNARNA-Binding Proteins

Identifiers

PMID25886642
PMCPMC4352265
OpenAlexW2151950216

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.