Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25886610›Full record

ArticleParasites & vectors2015

First molecular identification of mosquito vectors of Dirofilaria immitis in continental Portugal.

Cátia Alexandra Costa Ferreira, Verónica de Pinho Mixão, Maria Teresa Lourenço Marques Novo, Maria Manuela Palmeiro Calado, Luzia Augusta Pires Gonçalves, Silvana Maria Duarte Belo, António Paulo Gouveia de Almeida

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Parasites & vectors, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 29 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
29citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

29 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Molecular Surveillance ofPathogens (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026
    Article
  3. Article
  4. The Expansion ofInsects · 2026
    Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Current State of CanineAnimals : an open access journal from MDPI · 2024
    Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Prevalence ofJournal of nematology · 2021
    Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Helminthologia · 2020
    Article
  20. Exposure of humans to the zoonotic nematodeEpidemiology and infection · 2019
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Cátia Alexandra Costa FerreiraMedical Parasitology Unit, Medical Parasitology & Microbiology Unit-UPMM, Instituto de Higiene e Medicina Tropical, Universidade Nova de Lisboa, Rua da Junqueira 100, 1349-008, Lisboa, Portugal. cferreira@ihmt.unl.pt.
Verónica de Pinho MixãoMedical Parasitology Unit, Medical Parasitology & Microbiology Unit-UPMM, Instituto de Higiene e Medicina Tropical, Universidade Nova de Lisboa, Rua da Junqueira 100, 1349-008, Lisboa, Portugal. veronica_mixao@hotmail.com.
Maria Teresa Lourenço Marques NovoMedical Parasitology Unit, Medical Parasitology & Microbiology Unit-UPMM, Instituto de Higiene e Medicina Tropical, Universidade Nova de Lisboa, Rua da Junqueira 100, 1349-008, Lisboa, Portugal. tenovo@ihmt.unl.pt.
Maria Manuela Palmeiro CaladoMedical Parasitology Unit, Medical Parasitology & Microbiology Unit-UPMM, Instituto de Higiene e Medicina Tropical, Universidade Nova de Lisboa, Rua da Junqueira 100, 1349-008, Lisboa, Portugal. mcalado@ihmt.unl.pt.
Luzia Augusta Pires GonçalvesInternational Public Health and Biostatistics Unit, Instituto de Higiene e Medicina Tropical, Universidade Nova de Lisboa, Rua da Junqueira 100, 1349-008, Lisboa, Portugal. luziag@ihmt.unl.pt.
Silvana Maria Duarte BeloMedical Parasitology Unit, Medical Parasitology & Microbiology Unit-UPMM, Instituto de Higiene e Medicina Tropical, Universidade Nova de Lisboa, Rua da Junqueira 100, 1349-008, Lisboa, Portugal. silvanabelo@ihmt.unl.pt.
António Paulo Gouveia de AlmeidaMedical Parasitology Unit, Medical Parasitology & Microbiology Unit-UPMM, Instituto de Higiene e Medicina Tropical, Universidade Nova de Lisboa, Rua da Junqueira 100, 1349-008, Lisboa, Portugal. palmeida@ihmt.unl.pt.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundCanine dirofilariasis due to Dirofilaria immitis is known to be endemic in continental Portugal. However, information about the transmitting mosquito species is still scarce, with only Culex theileri identified to date, albeit with L1-2, through dissection. This study was carried out to investigate the potential vectors of Dirofilaria spp. in continental Portugal.

methodsMosquitoes were collected in three distinct seasons (Summer, Autumn and Spring), 2011-2013, in three districts. CDC traps and indoor resting collections were carried out in the vicinity of kennels. Mosquitoes were kept under controlled conditions for 7 days to allow the development of larval stages of Dirofilaria spp.. DNA extraction was performed separately for both head+thorax and abdomen in order to differentiate infective and infected specimens, respectively, in pools, grouped according to the species and collection site (1-40 specimen parts/pool), and examined by PCR using pan-filarial specific primers. Mosquito densities were compared using non-parametric tests. Dirofilaria development units (DDU) were estimated.

resultsIn total, 9156 female mosquitoes, from 11 different species, were captured. Mosquito densities varied among the 3 districts, according to capture method, and were generally higher in the second year of collections. From 5866 specimens screened by PCR, 23 head+thorax and 41 abdomens pools, corresponding to 54 mosquitoes were found positive for D. immitis DNA. These belonged to 5 species: Culex (Cux) theileri (estimated rate of infection (ERI)=0.71%), Cx. (Cux) pipiens f. pipiens and f. molestus (ERI=0.5%), Anopheles (Ano) maculipennis s.l. (ERI=3.12%), including An. (Ano) atroparvus, Aedes (Och) caspius (ERI=3.73%) and Ae. (Och) detritus s.l. (ERI=4.39%). All but Cx. pipiens, had at least one infective specimen. No D. repens infected specimens were found. Infection rates were: 3.21% in Coimbra, 1.22% in Setúbal and 0.54% in Santarém. DDU were at least 117/year in the study period.

conclusionsCulex theileri, Cx. pipiens, An. maculipennis s.l. An. atroparvus, Ae.caspius and Ae. detritus s.l. were identified as potential vectors of D. immitis in three districts of Portugal, from Spring to Autumn, in 5 of the 6 collection dates in 2011-2013. Implications for transmission, in the context of climate changes, and need for prophylactic measures, are discussed.

Indexed as

AedesAnimalsAnophelesCulexCulicidaeDirofilaria immitisDirofilariasisDNA, HelminthDogsFemaleInsect VectorsLarvaPolymerase Chain ReactionPortugalSeasonsDNA, Helminth

Identifiers

PMID25886610
PMCPMC4369802

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.