Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25886568›Full record

Trial reportBMC cancer2015

eCROPS-CA: a systematic approach toward effective and sustainable cancer prevention in rural China.

Jing Chai, Xingrong Shen, Rui Feng, Jing Cheng, Yeji Chen, Zhengqiu Zha, Shangchun Jia, Han Liang, Ting Zhao, Rui Sha and 3 more

Open access · goldAbstract readRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in BMC cancer, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
4.3field-weighted citation impact, top 7% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 9 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Article
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

13 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.

Jing ChaiSchool of Health Service Management, Anhui Medical University, Hefei, Anhui, China. jingchai82@sina.com.
Xingrong ShenSchool of Health Service Management, Anhui Medical University, Hefei, Anhui, China. 1264854421@qq.com.
Rui FengDepartment of Literature Review and Analysis, Library of Anhui Medical University, Hefei, Anhui, China. 853571123@qq.com.
Jing ChengSchool of Health Service Management, Anhui Medical University, Hefei, Anhui, China. jing_hp@sina.com.
Yeji ChenAnhui Center for Disease Control and Prevention, Hefei, Anhui, China. ahahcyj@163.com.
Zhengqiu ZhaAnhui Center for Disease Control and Prevention, Hefei, Anhui, China. 1061390122@sina.com.
Shangchun JiaAnhui Center for Disease Control and Prevention, Hefei, Anhui, China. xiao816meng@sina.cn.
Han LiangSchool of Health Service Management, Anhui Medical University, Hefei, Anhui, China. 1010066583@qq.com.
Ting ZhaoSchool of Health Service Management, Anhui Medical University, Hefei, Anhui, China. 1252509750@qq.com.
Rui ShaSchool of Health Service Management, Anhui Medical University, Hefei, Anhui, China. 1214984721@qq.com.
Yong ShiLuan Center for Disease Control and Prevention, Luan, Anhui, China. 295240260@qq.com.
Kaichun LiLuan Center for Disease Control and Prevention, Luan, Anhui, China. 1350612172@163.com.
Debin WangSchool of Health Service Management, Anhui Medical University, Hefei, Anhui, China. dbwang@vip.sina.com.
Anhui Medical University · CNAnhui Provincial Center for Disease Control and Prevention · CNXian Center for Disease Control and Prevention · CNFirst Affiliated Hospital of Anhui Medical University · CN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundEffective prevention against cancers depends heavily on sustained individual efforts practicing protective behaviors and avoiding risk factors in a complex sociocultural context, which requires continuous and personalized supports. Contemporary prevention relies primarily on strategies targeting general population with limited attention being paid to individualized approaches. This study tests a novel package called, in acronym of core intervention components, eCROPS-CA that leverages protective behaviors against over 80% leading cancers among high risk individuals via continuous and tailored counseling by village doctors. METHODS/

designThe study utilizes a quesi-RCT design involving 4320 high risk individuals selected, via rapid and detailed risk assessments, from about 72,000 farmers aged 35+ in 36 administrative villages randomized into equal intervention and delayed intervention arms. The intervention arm receives baseline and semiannual follow up evaluations plus eCROPS-CA for 5 years; while the control arm, only the baseline and follow-up evaluations for the first 5 years and eCROPS-CA starting from the 6(th) year if the intervention is proved effective. eCROPS-CA comprises electronic supports and supervision (e), counseling cancer prevention (C), recipe for objective behaviors (R), operational toolkit (O), performance-based incentives (P), and screening and assessment (S). Evaluation measures include: incidence and stage of the leading cancers, cancer-related knowledge, attitudes and practices; easy biophysical indicators (e.g., body mass index, blood pressure); intervention compliance, acceptance of the package. DISCUSSION: The prevention package incorporates key success factors in a synergetic way toward cost-effectiveness and long-term sustainability. It targets a set rather than any single cancer; choses village doctors as key solution to the widespread lack of professional manpower in implementing personalized and thus relatively sophisticated prevention; adopts real-time monitoring in reaching continuous improvement; utilizes smart web aids to enable prioritizing complex determinants of objective behaviors, linking counseling sessions happened at different time points and hence delivering highly coordinated prevention; uses 2-stage risk assessment models in identifying high risk individuals so as to focus on the most needed; applies standardized operation procedures in simplifying and smoothing behavior intervention yet ensuring delivery of essential steps and key elements. TRIALS REGISTRY: ISRCTN33269053.

Indexed as

Rural PopulationChinaCost-Benefit AnalysisFemaleHumansMaleNeoplasmsRisk Factors

Identifiers

PMID25886568
PMCPMC4416351
OpenAlexW2091114476

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.