Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25886398›Full record

ArticleBMC public health2015

Community led active schools programme (CLASP) exploring the implementation of health interventions in primary schools: headteachers' perspectives.

Danielle Christian, Charlotte Todd, Helen Davies, Jaynie Rance, Gareth Stratton, Frances Rapport, Sinead Brophy

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC public health, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 24 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
24citing papers in PubMed
7.8field-weighted citation impact, top 3% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

24 citing papers in PubMed, 50 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Trial
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Using the R = MCThe international journal of behavioral nutrition and physical activity · 2025
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Danielle ChristianCollege of Health and Human Science, Swansea University, Wales, SA2 8PP, UK. D.L.Christian@swansea.ac.uk.
Charlotte ToddCollege of Medicine, Swansea University, Swansea, SA2 8PP, UK. c.e.todd@swansea.ac.uk.
Helen DaviesCollege of Medicine, Swansea University, Swansea, SA2 8PP, UK. h.davies@swansea.ac.uk.
Jaynie RanceCollege of Health and Human Science, Swansea University, Wales, SA2 8PP, UK. j.y.rance@swansea.ac.uk.
Gareth StrattonA-STEM College of Engineering, Swansea University, Wales, SA2 8PP, UK. G.Stratton@swansea.ac.uk.
Frances RapportCollege of Medicine, Swansea University, Swansea, SA2 8PP, UK. f.l.rapport@swansea.ac.uk.
Sinead BrophyCollege of Medicine, Swansea University, Swansea, SA2 8PP, UK. s.brophy@swansea.ac.uk.
Swansea University · GB

Funding

Medical Research Council MR/K006525/1Medical Research Council MR/K023233/1Wellcome Trust
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundSchools are repeatedly utilised as a key setting for health interventions. However, the translation of effective research findings to the school setting can be problematic. In order to improve effective translation of future interventions, it is imperative key challenges and facilitators of implementing health interventions be understood from a school's perspective.

methodsNineteen semi-structured interviews were conducted in primary schools (headteachers n = 16, deputy headteacher n = 1, healthy school co-ordinator n = 2). Interviews were transcribed verbatim and analysed using thematic analysis.

resultsThe main challenges for schools in implementing health interventions were; government-led academic priorities, initiative overload, low autonomy for schools, lack of staff support, lack of facilities and resources, litigation risk and parental engagement. Recommendations to increase the application of interventions into the school setting included; better planning and organisation, greater collaboration with schools and external partners and elements addressing sustainability. Child-centred and cross-curricular approaches, inclusive whole school approaches and assurances to be supportive of the school ethos were also favoured for consideration.

conclusionsThis work explores schools' perspectives regarding the implementation of health interventions and utilises these thoughts to create guidelines for developing future school-based interventions. Recommendations include the need to account for variability between school environments, staff and pupils. Interventions with an element of adaptability were preferred over the delivery of blanket fixed interventions. Involving schools in the developmental stage would add useful insights to ensure the interventions can be tailored to best suit each individual schools' needs and improve implementation.

Indexed as

ExerciseChildFacultyHealth PromotionHumansInterviews as TopicParentsSchool Health Services

Identifiers

PMID25886398
PMCPMC4381418
OpenAlexW2106812851

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.