Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25886390›Full record

SynthesisBMC public health2015

Illness perceptions and explanatory models of viral hepatitis B & C among immigrants and refugees: a narrative systematic review.

John A Owiti, Trisha Greenhalgh, Lorna Sweeney, Graham R Foster, Kamaldeep S Bhui

Abstract readSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in BMC public health, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 28 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
28citing papers in PubMed, 3 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

28 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

John A OwitiWolfson Institute of Preventive Medicine, Barts and The London School of Medicine and Dentistry, Charterhouse Square, Queen Mary University of London, Centre for Psychiatry, EC1M 6BQ, London, UK. j.a.owiti@qmul.ac.uk.
Trisha GreenhalghBlizard Institute, Barts and The London School of Medicine and Dentistry, Queen Mary University of London, Centre for Primary Care and Public Health, Yvonne Carter Building, 58 Turner Street, E1 2AB, London, UK. p.greenhalgh@qmul.ac.uk.
Lorna SweeneyBlizard Institute, Barts and The London School of Medicine and Dentistry, Queen Mary University of London, Centre for Primary Care and Public Health, Yvonne Carter Building, 58 Turner Street, E1 2AB, London, UK. l.sweeney@qmul.ac.uk.
Graham R FosterBlizard Institute, Barts and The London School of Medicine and Dentistry, Queen Mary University of London, The Liver Unit, Centre for Digestive Diseases, 4 Newark Street, E1 2AT, London, UK. g.r.foster@qmul.ac.uk.
Kamaldeep S BhuiWolfson Institute of Preventive Medicine, Barts and The London School of Medicine and Dentistry, Charterhouse Square, Queen Mary University of London, Centre for Psychiatry, EC1M 6BQ, London, UK. k.s.bhui@qmul.ac.uk.

Funding

Department of Health RP-PG-1209-10038
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundHepatitis B and C (HBV, HCV) infections are associated with high morbidity and mortality. Many countries with traditionally low prevalence (such as UK) are now planning interventions (screening, vaccination, and treatment) of high-risk immigrants from countries with high prevalence. This review aimed to synthesise the evidence on immigrants' knowledge of HBV and HCV that might influence the uptake of clinical interventions. The review was also used to inform the design and successful delivery of a randomised controlled trial of targeted screening and treatment.

methodsFive databases (PubMed, CINHAL, SOCIOFILE, PsycINFO & Web of Science) were systematically searched, supplemented by reference tracking, searches of selected journals, and of relevant websites. We aimed to identify qualitative and quantitative studies that investigated knowledge of HBV and HCV among immigrants from high endemic areas to low endemic areas. Evidence, extracted according to a conceptual framework of Kleinman's explanatory model, was subjected to narrative synthesis. We adapted the PEN-3 model to categorise and analyse themes, and recommend strategies for interventions to influence help-seeking behaviour.

resultsWe identified 51 publications including quantitative (n = 39), qualitative (n = 11), and mixed methods (n = 1) designs. Most of the quantitative studies included small samples and had heterogeneous methods and outcomes. The studies mainly concentrated on hepatitis B and ethnic groups of South East Asian immigrants residing in USA, Canada, and Australia. Many immigrants lacked adequate knowledge of aetiology, symptoms, transmission risk factors, prevention strategies, and treatment, of hepatitis HBV and HCV. Ethnicity, gender, better education, higher income, and English proficiency influenced variations in levels and forms of knowledge.

conclusionImmigrants are vulnerable to HBV and HCV, and risk life-threatening complications from these infections because of poor knowledge and help-seeking behaviour. Primary studies in this area are extremely diverse and of variable quality precluding meta-analysis. Further research is needed outside North America and Australia.

Indexed as

Hepatitis BHepatitis CAsia, SoutheasternEmigrants and ImmigrantsFemaleHealth Knowledge, Attitudes, PracticeHumansMaleModels, TheoreticalPatient Acceptance of Health CarePrevalenceRefugees

Identifiers

PMID25886390
PMCPMC4336715

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.