Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25886377›Full record

Trial reportBMC psychiatry2015

Feasibility, acceptability and validity of SMS text messaging for measuring change in depression during a randomised controlled trial.

Stewart J Richmond, Ada Keding, Magdalene Hover, Rhian Gabe, Ben Cross, David Torgerson, Hugh MacPherson

Abstract readMulticenter StudyRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in BMC psychiatry, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 22 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
22citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

22 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. Trial
  3. Trial
  4. Trial
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Evaluating How Mental Health Changed in Australia through the COVID-19 Pandemic: Findings from the 'International journal of environmental research and public health · 2022
    Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Serial measurement of mood via text messaging in young people.Child and adolescent psychiatry and mental health · 2020
    Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Stewart J RichmondSydera Research Associates, 34 Shipman Road, Market Weighton, York, YO43 3RB, UK. syderaresearch@gmail.com.
Ada KedingDepartment of Health Sciences, University of York, Heslington, York, YO10 5DD, UK. ada.keding@york.ac.uk.
Magdalene HoverDepartment of Paediatrics, Hull and East Yorskshire Hospitals NHS Trust, Hull Royal Infirmary, Anlaby Road, Hull, HU3 2JZ, UK. maddy.hover@doctors.org.uk.
Rhian GabeDepartment of Health Sciences, University of York, Heslington, York, YO10 5DD, UK. rhian.gabe@york.ac.uk.
Ben CrossSydera Research Associates, 34 Shipman Road, Market Weighton, York, YO43 3RB, UK. bencross1977@gmail.com.
David TorgersonDepartment of Health Sciences, University of York, Heslington, York, YO10 5DD, UK. david.torgerson@york.ac.uk.
Hugh MacPhersonDepartment of Health Sciences, University of York, Heslington, York, YO10 5DD, UK. hugh.macpherson@york.ac.uk.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundDespite widespread popularity, text messaging has rarely been used for data collection in clinical research. This paper reports on the development, feasibility, acceptability, validity, and discriminant utility of a single item depression rating scale, delivered weekly via an automated SMS system, as part of a large randomised controlled trial.

methods755 depressed patients (BDI-II score ≥20) were recruited from primary care into a randomised trial of acupuncture versus counselling or usual care, and invited to opt into a repeated-measures text messaging sub-study. Two weeks following random allocation, trial participants were sent a weekly text message for 15 weeks. Texts were a single question asking, on a scale from 1 to 9, the extent to which they felt depressed. Feasibility and acceptability of the automated SMS system were evaluated according to cost, ease of implementation, proportion consenting, response rates, and qualitative feedback. Concurrent validity was estimated by correlating SMS responses with the Patient Health Questionnaire (PHQ-9). SMS responses were compared between groups over time to explore treatment effects.

results527 (69.8%) trial participants consented to the texting sub-study, of whom 498 (94.5%) responded to at least one message. Participants provided a valid response to an average of 12.5 messages. Invalid responses accounted for 1.1% of texts. The automated SMS system was quick to set-up, inexpensive, and well received. Comparison of PHQ-9 and SMS responses at 3 months demonstrated a moderate to high degree of agreement (Kendall's tau-b = 0.57, p < 0.0001, n = 220). SMS depression scores over the 15 weeks differed significantly between trial arms (p = 0.007), with participants allocated to the acupuncture and counselling arms reporting improved depression outcomes compared to usual GP care alone, which reached statistical significance ten weeks after randomisation. Overall, the single item SMS scale also appeared more responsive to changes in depression, resulting from treatment, than the PHQ-9.

conclusionsAutomated SMS systems offer a feasible and acceptable means of monitoring depression within clinical research. This study provides clear evidence to support the regular use of a simple SMS scale as a sensitive and valid outcome measure of depression within future randomised controlled trials.

trial registrationCurrent Controlled Trials - ISRCTN63787732 http://www.controlled-trials.com/ISRCTN63787732/ACUDEP Date of registration: 15/12/2009.

Indexed as

Text MessagingAcupuncture TherapyAdultCounselingData CollectionDepressive DisorderFeasibility StudiesFemaleGeneral PracticeHumansMalePatient SatisfactionPsychiatric Status Rating ScalesReproducibility of ResultsTreatment Outcome

Identifiers

PMID25886377
PMCPMC4391083

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.