ArticleMicrobial cell factories2015
Dynamic regulation of gene expression using sucrose responsive promoters and RNA interference in Saccharomyces cerevisiae.
Article in Microbial cell factories, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
13 citing papers in PubMed, 78 citations in OpenAlex.
- Strategies and applications for alleviating carbon catabolite repression.Synthetic and systems biotechnology · 2027Review
- A transcription termination mechanism for maintaining homogeneous protein expression.Nucleic acids research · 2025Article
- Integrated omic analysis of a new flavor yeast strain in fermented rice milk.FEMS yeast research · 2025Article
- A novel sucrose-inducible expression system and its application for production of biomass-degrading enzymes in Aspergillus niger.Biotechnology for biofuels and bioproducts · 2023Article
- Discovery and identification of medium-chain fatty acid responsive promoters inEngineering in life sciences · 2020Article
- Advances in RNAi-Assisted Strain Engineering inFrontiers in bioengineering and biotechnology · 2020Review
- Biosensor-based enzyme engineering approach applied to psicose biosynthesis.Synthetic biology (Oxford, England) · 2019Article
- In vivo biosensors: mechanisms, development, and applications.Journal of industrial microbiology & biotechnology · 2018Article
- Fundamental CRISPR-Cas9 tools and current applications in microbial systems.Synthetic and systems biotechnology · 2017Review
- Dynamic control of ERG20 expression combined with minimized endogenous downstream metabolism contributes to the improvement of geraniol production in Saccharomyces cerevisiae.Microbial cell factories · 2017Article
- Optimization of industrial microorganisms: recent advances in synthetic dynamic regulators.Journal of industrial microbiology & biotechnology · 2017Review
- Coupling gene regulatory patterns to bioprocess conditions to optimize synthetic metabolic modules for improved sesquiterpene production in yeast.Biotechnology for biofuels · 2017Article
- TheMetabolic engineering communications · 2016Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundEngineering dynamic, environmentally- and temporally-responsive control of gene expression is one of the principle objectives in the field of synthetic biology. Dynamic regulation is desirable because many engineered functions conflict with endogenous processes which have evolved to facilitate growth and survival, and minimising conflict between growth and production phases can improve product titres in microbial cell factories. There are a limited number of mechanisms that enable dynamic regulation in yeast, and fewer still that are appropriate for application in an industrial setting.
resultsTo address this problem we have identified promoters that are repressed during growth on glucose, and activated during growth on sucrose. Catabolite repression and preferential glucose utilisation allows active growth on glucose before switching to production on sucrose. Using sucrose as an activator of gene expression circumvents the need for expensive inducer compounds and enables gene expression to be triggered during growth on a fermentable, high energy-yield carbon source. The ability to fine-tune the timing and population density at which gene expression is activated from the SUC2 promoter was demonstrated by varying the ratio of glucose to sucrose in the growth medium. Finally, we demonstrated that the system could also be used to repress gene expression (a process also required for many engineering projects). We used the glucose/sucrose system to control a heterologous RNA interference module and dynamically repress the expression of a constitutively regulated GFP gene.
conclusionsThe low noise levels and high dynamic range of the SUC2 promoter make it a promising option for implementing dynamic regulation in yeast. The capacity to repress gene expression using RNA interference makes the system highly versatile, with great potential for metabolic engineering applications.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.