Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25886301›Full record

SynthesisBMC cancer2015

Apparent diffusion coefficient measurement by diffusion weighted magnetic resonance imaging is a useful tool in differentiating renal tumors.

Jing-Hong Liu, Shi-Feng Tian, Ye Ju, Ye Li, An-Liang Chen, Li-Hua Chen, Ai-Lian Liu

Open access · goldAbstract readMeta-Analysis
In one paragraph

Synthesis in BMC cancer, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
0.8field-weighted citation impact, top 25% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed, 6 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Mono, bi- and tri-exponential diffusion MRI modelling for renal solid masses and comparison with histopathological findings.Cancer imaging : the official publication of the International Cancer Imaging Society · 2018
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Jing-Hong LiuDepartment of Radiology, The First Affiliated Hospital of Dalian Medical University, Zhongshan Road No. 222, Xigang District, Dalian, 116011, P. R China. liujinghong704@126.com.
Shi-Feng TianDepartment of Radiology, The First Affiliated Hospital of Dalian Medical University, Zhongshan Road No. 222, Xigang District, Dalian, 116011, P. R China. tianshifeng704@126.com.
Ye JuDepartment of Radiology, The First Affiliated Hospital of Dalian Medical University, Zhongshan Road No. 222, Xigang District, Dalian, 116011, P. R China. juye704@126.com.
Ye LiDepartment of Radiology, Dalian Medical University, Dalian, 116044, P. R China. liye704@126.com.
An-Liang ChenDepartment of Radiology, Dalian Medical University, Dalian, 116044, P. R China. chenanliang704@126.com.
Li-Hua ChenDepartment of Radiology, Dalian Medical University, Dalian, 116044, P. R China. chenlihua704@126.com.
Ai-Lian LiuDepartment of Radiology, The First Affiliated Hospital of Dalian Medical University, Zhongshan Road No. 222, Xigang District, Dalian, 116011, P. R China. liuailian704@126.com.
Dalian Medical University · CNFirst Affiliated Hospital of Dalian Medical University · CN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundTo determine the clinical value of apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC) measurement by diffusion weighted magnetic resonance imaging (DW-MRI) in differentiating renal tumors.

methodsElectronic databases were searched using combinations of keywords and free words relating to renal tumor, ADC and DW-MRI. Based on carefully selected inclusion and exclusion criteria, relevant case-control studies were identified and the related clinical data was acquired. Statistical analyses were performed using STATA 12.0 (Stata Corporation, College station, TX).

resultsSixteen case-control studies were ultimately included in the present meta-analysis. These 16 high quality studies contained a combined total of 438 normal renal tissues and 832 renal tumor lesions (597 malignant and 235 benign). The results revealed that ADC values of malignant renal tumor tissues were markedly lower than normal renal tissues and benign renal tumor tissues. ADC values of benign renal tumor tissues were also significantly lower than normal renal tissue.

conclusionsADC measurement by DW-MRI provided clinically useful information on the internal structure of renal tumors and could be an important radiographic index for differentiation of malignant renal tumors from benign renal tumors.

Indexed as

Diffusion Magnetic Resonance ImagingCase-Control StudiesDatabases, FactualHumansKidney NeoplasmsPublication BiasSensitivity and Specificity

Identifiers

PMID25886301
PMCPMC4403953
OpenAlexW2163607251

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.