Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25886058›Full record

Trial reportBMC cancer2015

The efficacy and safety of irreversible electroporation for the ablation of renal masses: a prospective, human, in-vivo study protocol.

Peter G K Wagstaff, Daniel M de Bruin, Patricia J Zondervan, C Dilara Savci Heijink, Marc R W Engelbrecht, Otto M van Delden, Ton G van Leeuwen, Hessel Wijkstra, Jean J M C H de la Rosette, M Pilar Laguna Pes

Registry-linked trialOpen access · goldAbstract readClinical Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in BMC cancer, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT02298608 (The Efficacy and Safety of Irreversible Electroporation for the Ablation of Renal Masses), which is not on this map. Cited by 9 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed
6.8field-weighted citation impact, top 3% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT02298608 phase1 / phase2unknown statusnot on this map

The Efficacy and Safety of Irreversible Electroporation for the Ablation of Renal Masses: A Prospective, Human, In-Vivo Study.

TypeinterventionalSponsorAcademisch Medisch Centrum - Universiteit van Amsterdam (AMC-UvA)Ran2014 to 2016Enrolled10ConditionsKidney CancerArmsNano Knife
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed, 27 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. Review
  9. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Peter G K WagstaffDepartment of Urology, Academic Medical Center, Meibergdreef 9, 1105AZ, Amsterdam, Netherlands. p.g.wagstaff@amc.nl.
Daniel M de BruinDepartment of Urology, Academic Medical Center, Meibergdreef 9, 1105AZ, Amsterdam, Netherlands. d.m.debruin@amc.nl.
Patricia J ZondervanDepartment of Urology, Academic Medical Center, Meibergdreef 9, 1105AZ, Amsterdam, Netherlands. p.j.zondervan@amc.nl.
C Dilara Savci HeijinkDepartment of Pathology, Academic Medical Center, Meibergdreef 9, 1105AZ, Amsterdam, Netherlands. c.d.savciheijink@amc.nl.
Marc R W EngelbrechtDepartment of Radiology, Academic Medical Center, Meibergdreef 9, 1105AZ, Amsterdam, Netherlands. m.r.engelbrecht@amc.nl.
Otto M van DeldenDepartment of Radiology, Academic Medical Center, Meibergdreef 9, 1105AZ, Amsterdam, Netherlands. o.m.vandelden@amc.nl.
Ton G van LeeuwenDepartment of Biomedical Engineering & Physics, Academic Medical Center, Meibergdreef 9, 1105AZ, Amsterdam, Netherlands. t.g.vanleeuwen@amc.nl.
Hessel WijkstraDepartment of Urology, Academic Medical Center, Meibergdreef 9, 1105AZ, Amsterdam, Netherlands. h.wijkstra@amc.nl.
Jean J M C H de la RosetteDepartment of Urology, Academic Medical Center, Meibergdreef 9, 1105AZ, Amsterdam, Netherlands. j.j.delarosette@amc.nl.
M Pilar Laguna PesDepartment of Urology, Academic Medical Center, Meibergdreef 9, 1105AZ, Amsterdam, Netherlands. m.p.lagunapes@amc.nl.
Academic Medical Center · NL

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundElectroporation is a novel treatment technique utilizing electric pulses, traveling between two or more electrodes, to ablate targeted tissue. The first in human studies have proven the safety of IRE for the ablation of renal masses. However the efficacy of IRE through histopathological examination of an ablated renal tumour has not yet been studied. Before progressing to a long-term IRE follow-up study it is vital to have pathological confirmation of the efficacy of the technique. Furthermore, follow-up after IRE ablation requires a validated imaging modality. The primary objectives of this study are the safety and the efficacy of IRE ablation of renal masses. The secondary objectives are the efficacy of MRI and CEUS in the imaging of ablation result. METHODS/

design10 patients, age ≥ 18 years, presenting with a solid enhancing mass, who are candidates for radical nephrectomy will undergo IRE ablation 4 weeks prior to radical nephrectomy. MRI and CEUS imaging will be performed at baseline, one week and four weeks post IRE. After radical nephrectomy, pathological examination will be performed to evaluate IRE ablation success. DISCUSSION: The only way to truly assess short-term (4 weeks) ablation success is by histopathology of a resection specimen. In our opinion this trial will provide essential knowledge on the safety and efficacy of IRE of renal masses, guiding future research of this promising ablative technique.

trial registrationClinicaltrials.gov registration number NCT02298608 . Dutch Central Committee on Research Involving Human Subjects registration number NL44785.018.13.

Indexed as

Catheter AblationElectroporationHumansKidney NeoplasmsProspective StudiesTreatment Outcome

Identifiers

PMID25886058
PMCPMC4376341
OpenAlexW2027332078

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.