Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25885927›Full record

ArticleThe international journal of behavioral nutrition and physical activity2015

A novel assessment of adolescent mobility: a pilot study.

Tom Stewart, Scott Duncan, Basile Chaix, Yan Kestens, Jasper Schipperijn, Grant Schofield

Open access · goldAbstract readEvaluation Study
In one paragraph

Article in The international journal of behavioral nutrition and physical activity, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed
7.8field-weighted citation impact, top 3% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed, 24 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Map-based assessment of older adults' life space: validity and reliability.European review of aging and physical activity : official journal of the European Group for Research into Elderly and Physical Activity · 2020
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 4 institutions in 4 countries.

Tom StewartHuman Potential Centre, Auckland University of Technology, Private Bag 92006, Auckland, 1142, Auckland, New Zealand. tom.stewart@aut.ac.nz.
Scott DuncanHuman Potential Centre, Auckland University of Technology, Private Bag 92006, Auckland, 1142, Auckland, New Zealand. scott.duncan@aut.ac.nz.
Basile ChaixInserm, U707, Paris, France. chaix@u707.jussieu.fr.
Yan KestensCRCHUM, Department of social and preventive medicine, Université de Montréal, Montreal, Canada. yan.kestens@umontreal.ca.
Jasper SchipperijnResearch Unit for Active Living, Department of Sport Science and Clinical Biomechanics, University of Southern Denmark, Odense, Denmark. jschipperijn@health.sdu.dk.
Grant SchofieldHuman Potential Centre, Auckland University of Technology, Private Bag 92006, Auckland, 1142, Auckland, New Zealand. grant.schofield@aut.ac.nz.
Auckland University of Technology · NZInserm · FRUniversité de Montréal · CAUniversity of Southern Denmark · DK

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe accurate measurement of daily mobility and travel to destinations beyond the residential neighbourhood has been identified as an important but almost systematically overlooked factor when investigating the relationship between exposure to the built environment and physical activity. The recent development of VERITAS - a web-based application nested within a computer-assisted personal interview - allows researchers to assess daily mobility, travel to regular destinations, and perceived neighbourhood boundaries using interactive mapping technology. The aims of this pilot study were to (1) demonstrate the feasibility and functionality of using VERITAS in an adolescent sample, and (2) compare urban form characteristics and geometric features of the perceived neighbourhood with traditional neighbourhood delimitations.

methodsData were collected and analysed for twenty-eight participants (14 male, 15.9 ± 1.48 years) in 2013. Participants underwent anthropometric assessment before completing a custom-designed VERITAS protocol under the supervision of trained interview technicians. Regularly visited destinations, school travel routes, transportation modes, travel companions, and perceived neighbourhood boundaries were assessed. Data were imported into ArcGIS and street network distances between the home and each geolocated destination were generated. Convex hull activity spaces were derived from destinations. Urban form variables and geometric characteristics were compared between the perceived neighbourhood, existing meshblocks, 1 mile Euclidean buffers, and 1 km network buffers.

resultsIn total, 529 destinations were geolocated, 58% of which were outside the perceived neighbourhood boundary. Active travel was inversely associated with distance to destinations (r = -.43, p < .05) and traveling with adults (r = -.68, p < .01). Urban form and geometric characteristics of the perceived neighbourhood were different from those in other neighbourhood delimitations.

conclusionsThis study demonstrates the feasibility of using VERITAS to assess mobility within adolescent populations. Our results also illustrate the potential novelty and use of user-defined spaces, and highlight the limitations of relying on restricted definitions of place (i.e., administrative or residential-focused neighbourhoods) when assessing environmental exposure.

Indexed as

Environment DesignExerciseInternetResidence CharacteristicsSoftwareTransportationAdolescentFeasibility StudiesFemaleHealth BehaviorHumansMalePerceptionPilot ProjectsSchoolsTravel

Identifiers

PMID25885927
PMCPMC4336506
OpenAlexW2072091954

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.