Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25885894›Full record

ArticleGenetics, selection, evolution : GSE2015

Improving the computational efficiency of fully Bayes inference and assessing the effect of misspecification of hyperparameters in whole-genome prediction models.

Wenzhao Yang, Chunyu Chen, Robert J Tempelman

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Genetics, selection, evolution : GSE, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Wenzhao YangDepartment of Animal Science, Michigan State University, East Lansing, MI, 48824-1225, USA. mishelywz@gmail.com.
Chunyu ChenDepartment of Animal Science, Michigan State University, East Lansing, MI, 48824-1225, USA. chench57@msu.edu.
Robert J TempelmanDepartment of Animal Science, Michigan State University, East Lansing, MI, 48824-1225, USA. tempelma@msu.edu.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe reliability of whole-genome prediction models (WGP) based on using high-density single nucleotide polymorphism (SNP) panels critically depends on proper specification of key hyperparameters. A currently popular WGP model labeled BayesB specifies a hyperparameter π, that is `loosely used to describe the proportion of SNPs that are in linkage disequilibrium (LD) with causal variants. The remaining markers are specified to be random draws from a Student t distribution with key hyperparameters being degrees of freedom v and scale s(2).

methodsWe consider three alternative Markov chain Monte Carlo (MCMC) approaches based on the use of Metropolis-Hastings (MH) to estimate these key hyperparameters. The first approach, termed DFMH, is based on a previously published strategy for which s(2) is drawn by a Gibbs step and v is drawn by a MH step. The second strategy, termed UNIMH, substitutes MH for Gibbs when drawing s(2) and further collapses or marginalizes the full conditional density of v. The third strategy, termed BIVMH, is based on jointly drawing the two hyperparameters in a bivariate MH step. We also tested the effect of misspecification of s(2) for its effect on accuracy of genomic estimated breeding values (GEBV), yet allowing for inference on the other hyperparameters.

resultsThe UNIMH and BIVMH strategies had significantly greater (P < 0.05) computational efficiencies for estimating v and s(2) than DFMH in BayesA (π = 1) and BayesB implementations. We drew similar conclusions based on an analysis of the public domain heterogeneous stock mice data. We also determined significant drops (P < 0.01) in accuracies of GEBV under BayesA by overspecifying s(2), whereas BayesB was more robust to such misspecifications. However, understating s(2) was compensated by counterbalancing inferences on v in BayesA and BayesB, and on π in BayesB.

conclusionsSampling strategies based solely on MH updates of v and s(2), and collapsed representations of full conditional densities can improve the computational efficiency of MCMC relative to the use of Gibbs updates. We believe that proper inferences on s(2), v and π are vital to ensure that the accuracy of GEBV is maximized when using parametric WGP models.

Indexed as

Bayes TheoremComputer SimulationGenomeModels, GeneticPolymorphism, Single NucleotideAlgorithmsAnimalsGenomicsLinkage DisequilibriumMarkov ChainsMiceMonte Carlo MethodQuantitative Trait LociReproducibility of Results

Identifiers

PMID25885894
PMCPMC4351701

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.