ArticleGenetics, selection, evolution : GSE2015
Improving the computational efficiency of fully Bayes inference and assessing the effect of misspecification of hyperparameters in whole-genome prediction models.
Article in Genetics, selection, evolution : GSE, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
7 citing papers in PubMed.
- Estimating genetic variance contributed by a quantitative trait locus: A random model approach.PLoS computational biology · 2022Article
- Genomic Prediction Using Bayesian Regression Models With Global-Local Prior.Frontiers in genetics · 2021Article
- The influence of a first-order antedependence model and hyperparameters in BayesCπ for genomic prediction.Asian-Australasian journal of animal sciences · 2018Article
- Article
- Covariance Between Genotypic Effects and its Use for Genomic Inference in Half-Sib Families.G3 (Bethesda, Md.) · 2016Article
- Article
- Genomic Prediction Accounting for Residual Heteroskedasticity.G3 (Bethesda, Md.) · 2015Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundThe reliability of whole-genome prediction models (WGP) based on using high-density single nucleotide polymorphism (SNP) panels critically depends on proper specification of key hyperparameters. A currently popular WGP model labeled BayesB specifies a hyperparameter π, that is `loosely used to describe the proportion of SNPs that are in linkage disequilibrium (LD) with causal variants. The remaining markers are specified to be random draws from a Student t distribution with key hyperparameters being degrees of freedom v and scale s(2).
methodsWe consider three alternative Markov chain Monte Carlo (MCMC) approaches based on the use of Metropolis-Hastings (MH) to estimate these key hyperparameters. The first approach, termed DFMH, is based on a previously published strategy for which s(2) is drawn by a Gibbs step and v is drawn by a MH step. The second strategy, termed UNIMH, substitutes MH for Gibbs when drawing s(2) and further collapses or marginalizes the full conditional density of v. The third strategy, termed BIVMH, is based on jointly drawing the two hyperparameters in a bivariate MH step. We also tested the effect of misspecification of s(2) for its effect on accuracy of genomic estimated breeding values (GEBV), yet allowing for inference on the other hyperparameters.
resultsThe UNIMH and BIVMH strategies had significantly greater (P < 0.05) computational efficiencies for estimating v and s(2) than DFMH in BayesA (π = 1) and BayesB implementations. We drew similar conclusions based on an analysis of the public domain heterogeneous stock mice data. We also determined significant drops (P < 0.01) in accuracies of GEBV under BayesA by overspecifying s(2), whereas BayesB was more robust to such misspecifications. However, understating s(2) was compensated by counterbalancing inferences on v in BayesA and BayesB, and on π in BayesB.
conclusionsSampling strategies based solely on MH updates of v and s(2), and collapsed representations of full conditional densities can improve the computational efficiency of MCMC relative to the use of Gibbs updates. We believe that proper inferences on s(2), v and π are vital to ensure that the accuracy of GEBV is maximized when using parametric WGP models.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.