Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25885771›Full record

ArticleBMC genomics2015

Investigating the mobilome in clinically important lineages of Enterococcus faecium and Enterococcus faecalis.

Theresa Mikalsen, Torunn Pedersen, Rob Willems, Teresa M Coque, Guido Werner, Ewa Sadowy, Willem van Schaik, Lars Bogø Jensen, Arnfinn Sundsfjord, Kristin Hegstad

Erratum issuedOpen access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC genomics, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 52 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
52citing papers in PubMed
5.6field-weighted citation impact, top 3% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

52 citing papers in PubMed, 94 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Genomic Characterization of Multiple Antibiotic-ResistantAntibiotics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. CRISPR-Cas systems in enterococci.Brazilian journal of microbiology : [publication of the Brazilian Society for Microbiology] · 2024
    Review
  9. Probiotic and Postbiotic Potentials ofPharmaceuticals (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024
    Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. High prevalence and plasmidome diversity ofFrontiers in microbiology · 2024
    Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. A Genomic Snapshot of Antibiotic-ResistantGlobal health, epidemiology and genomics · 2023
    Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Longitudinal Analysis of Antimicrobial Resistance amongAnimals : an open access journal from MDPI · 2022
    Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors at 7 institutions in 7 countries.

Theresa MikalsenResearch group for Host-microbe Interactions, Department of Medical Biology, Faculty of Health Science, UiT - The Arctic University of Norway, Tromsø, Norway. Theresa.Mikalsen@uit.no.
Torunn PedersenNorwegian National Advisory Unit on Detection of Antimicrobial Resistance, Department of Microbiology and Infection Control, University Hospital of North Norway, Tromsø, Norway. Torunn.Annie.Pedersen@unn.no.
Rob WillemsDepartment of Medical Microbiology, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht, The Netherlands. rwillems@umcutrecht.nl.
Teresa M CoqueServicio de Microbiologia, Hospital Ramón y Cajal, Instituto Ramón y Cajal de Investigación Sanitaria (IRYCIS), Madrid, Spain. teresacoque@gmail.com.
Guido WernerDivision of Nosocomial Pathogens and Antibiotic Resistance, Robert Koch Institute, Wernigerode Branch, Wernigerode, Germany. WernerG@rki.de.
Ewa SadowyDepartment of Molecular Microbiology, National Medicines Institute, ul, Chełmska 30/34, 00-725, Warsaw, Poland. ewasadowy@cls.edu.pl.
Willem van SchaikDepartment of Medical Microbiology, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht, The Netherlands. W.vanSchaik@umcutrecht.nl.
Lars Bogø JensenDivision of Food Microbiologyt, National Food Institute, Danish Technical University, Copenhagen V, Denmark. lboj@food.dtu.dk.
Arnfinn SundsfjordResearch group for Host-microbe Interactions, Department of Medical Biology, Faculty of Health Science, UiT - The Arctic University of Norway, Tromsø, Norway. arnfinn.sundsfjord@uit.no.
Kristin HegstadResearch group for Host-microbe Interactions, Department of Medical Biology, Faculty of Health Science, UiT - The Arctic University of Norway, Tromsø, Norway. Kristin.Hegstad@uit.no.
University Hospital of North Norway · NOUniversity Medical Center Utrecht · NLFood Research Institute · SKInstituto Ramón y Cajal de Investigación Sanitaria · ESNarodowy Instytut Leków · PLRobert Koch Institute · DEUiT The Arctic University of Norway · NO

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe success of Enterococcus faecium and E. faecalis evolving as multi-resistant nosocomial pathogens is associated with their ability to acquire and share adaptive traits, including antimicrobial resistance genes encoded by mobile genetic elements (MGEs). Here, we investigate this mobilome in successful hospital associated genetic lineages, E. faecium sequence type (ST)17 (n=10) and ST78 (n=10), E. faecalis ST6 (n=10) and ST40 (n=10) by DNA microarray analyses.

resultsThe hybridization patterns of 272 representative targets including plasmid backbones (n=85), transposable elements (n=85), resistance determinants (n=67), prophages (n=29) and clustered regularly interspaced short palindromic repeats (CRISPR)-cas sequences (n=6) separated the strains according to species, and for E. faecalis also according to STs. RCR-, Rep_3-, RepA_N- and Inc18-family plasmids were highly prevalent and with the exception of Rep_3, evenly distributed between the species. There was a considerable difference in the replicon profile, with rep 17/pRUM , rep 2/pRE25 , rep 14/EFNP1 and rep 20/pLG1 dominating in E. faecium and rep 9/pCF10 , rep 2/pRE25 and rep 7 in E. faecalis strains. We observed an overall high correlation between the presence and absence of genes coding for resistance towards antibiotics, metals, biocides and their corresponding MGEs as well as their phenotypic antimicrobial susceptibility pattern. Although most IS families were represented in both E. faecalis and E. faecium, specific IS elements within these families were distributed in only one species. The prevalence of IS256-, IS3-, ISL3-, IS200/IS605-, IS110-, IS982- and IS4-transposases was significantly higher in E. faecium than E. faecalis, and that of IS110-, IS982- and IS1182-transposases in E. faecalis ST6 compared to ST40. Notably, the transposases of IS981, ISEfm1 and IS1678 that have only been reported in few enterococcal isolates were well represented in the E. faecium strains. E. faecalis ST40 strains harboured possible functional CRISPR-Cas systems, and still resistance and prophage sequences were generally well represented.

conclusionsThe targeted MGEs were highly prevalent among the selected STs, underlining their potential importance in the evolution of hospital-adapted lineages of enterococci. Although the propensity of inter-species horizontal gene transfer (HGT) must be emphasized, the considerable species-specificity of these MGEs indicates a separate vertical evolution of MGEs within each species, and for E. faecalis within each ST.

Indexed as

Genes, BacterialAnti-Bacterial AgentsBase SequenceClustered Regularly Interspaced Short Palindromic RepeatsDrug Resistance, BacterialEnterococcus faecalisEnterococcus faeciumGenetic LinkageGene Transfer, HorizontalGram-Positive Bacterial InfectionsHumansInterspersed Repetitive SequencesMicrobial Sensitivity TestsNucleic Acid HybridizationPlasmidsPrincipal Component AnalysisAnti-Bacterial Agents

Identifiers

PMID25885771
PMCPMC4438569
OpenAlexW2134149436

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.