Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25885744›Full record

ArticleParasites & vectors2015

Comparison of the performance of three PCR assays for the detection and differentiation of Theileria orientalis genotypes.

Piyumali K Perera, Robin B Gasser, David J Pulford, Mark A Stevenson, Simon M Firestone, Andrew M J McFadden, Abdul Jabbar

Open access · goldAbstract readComparative StudyEvaluation Study
In one paragraph

Article in Parasites & vectors, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed
3.0field-weighted citation impact, top 10% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed, 26 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Genetic Resistance of Bovines to Theileriosis.Animals : an open access journal from MDPI · 2022
    Review
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

Piyumali K PereraFaculty of Veterinary and Agricultural Sciences, The University of Melbourne, Werribee, Victoria, 3030, Australia. pkperera@student.unimelb.edu.au.
Robin B GasserFaculty of Veterinary and Agricultural Sciences, The University of Melbourne, Werribee, Victoria, 3030, Australia. robinbg@unimelb.edu.au.
David J PulfordInvestigation and Diagnostic Centres and Response, Ministry for Primary Industries, Wellington, New Zealand. david.pulford@mpi.govt.nz.
Mark A StevensonFaculty of Veterinary and Agricultural Sciences, The University of Melbourne, Werribee, Victoria, 3030, Australia. mark.stevenson1@unimelb.edu.au.
Simon M FirestoneFaculty of Veterinary and Agricultural Sciences, The University of Melbourne, Werribee, Victoria, 3030, Australia. simon.firestone@unimelb.edu.au.
Andrew M J McFaddenInvestigation and Diagnostic Centres and Response, Ministry for Primary Industries, Wellington, New Zealand. andrew.mcfadden@mpi.govt.nz.
Abdul JabbarFaculty of Veterinary and Agricultural Sciences, The University of Melbourne, Werribee, Victoria, 3030, Australia. jabbara@unimelb.edu.au.
The University of Melbourne · AUMinistry for Primary Industries · NZ

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundOriental theileriosis is a tick-borne disease of bovines caused by the members of the Theileria orientalis complex. Recently, we developed a multiplexed tandem (MT) PCR to detect, differentiate and quantitate four genotypes (i.e., buffeli, chitose, ikeda and type 5) of T. orientalis. In this study, we used MT PCR to assess the prevalence and infection intensity of four T. orientalis genotypes in selected cattle herds that experienced oriental theileriosis outbreaks in New Zealand, and compared the sensitivities and specificities of MT PCR, PCR-high resolution melting (PCR-HRM) and a TaqMan qPCR.

methodsMT PCR, PCR-HRM analysis for T. orientalis and a TaqMan qPCR assay for ikeda genotype were employed to test 154 and 88 cattle blood samples from North (where oriental theileriosis outbreaks had occurred; designated as Group 1) and South (where no outbreaks had been reported; Group 2) Islands of New Zealand, respectively. Quantitative data from MT PCR assay were analyzed using generalized linear model and paired-sample t-test. The diagnostic specificity and sensitivity of the assays were estimated using a Bayesian latent class modeling approach.

resultsIn Group 1, 99.4% (153/154) of cattle were test-positive for T. orientalis in both the MT PCR and PCR-HRM assays. The apparent prevalences of genotype ikeda in Group 1 were 87.6% (134/153) and 87.7% (135/154) using the MT PCR and Ikeda TaqMan qPCR assays, respectively. Using the MT PCR test, all four genotypes of T. orientalis were detected. The infection intensity estimated for genotype ikeda was significantly higher (P = 0.009) in severely anaemic cattle than in those without anaemia, and this intensity was significantly higher than that of buffeli (P < 0.001) in the former cattle. Bayesian latent class analysis showed that the diagnostic sensitivities (97.1-98.9%) and specificities (96.5-98.9%) of the three PCR assays were very comparable.

conclusionThe present findings show the advantages of using the MT PCR assay as a useful tool for in-depth epidemiological and transmission studies of T. orientalis worldwide.

Indexed as

AnimalsCattleCattle DiseasesDisease OutbreaksGenotypeGenotyping TechniquesMolecular Diagnostic TechniquesMolecular EpidemiologyMultiplex Polymerase Chain ReactionNew ZealandParasitologyPrevalenceSensitivity and SpecificityTheileriaTheileriasisVeterinary Medicine

Identifiers

PMID25885744
PMCPMC4393603
OpenAlexW2026244581

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.