Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25885704›Full record

Trial reportBMC public health2015

Evaluation of a pilot healthy eating intervention in restaurants and food stores of a rural community: a randomized community trial.

Ana P Martínez-Donate, Ann Josie Riggall, Amy M Meinen, Kristen Malecki, Anne L Escaron, Bev Hall, Anne Menzies, Gary Garske, F Javier Nieto, Susan Nitzke

Abstract readRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in BMC public health, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 30 papers, 10 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
30citing papers in PubMed, 10 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

30 citing papers in PubMed, 10 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. The implementation and effectiveness of outlet-level healthy food and beverage accreditation schemes: A systematic review.Obesity reviews : an official journal of the International Association for the Study of Obesity · 2023
    Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. Improving Consumption and Purchases of Healthier Foods in Retail Environments: A Systematic Review.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2020
    Pooled it
  6. Pooled it
  7. Pooled it
  8. Measuring Rural Food Environments for Local Action in Australia: A Systematic Critical Synthesis Review.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2019
    Pooled it
  9. Pooled it
  10. Pooled it
  11. Trial
  12. Trial
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Community Solutions to Increase the Healthfulness of Grocery Stores: Perspectives of Immigrant Parents.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2023
    Article
  17. Review
  18. Balancing Mission and Margins: What Makes Healthy Community Food Stores Successful.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2022
    Article
  19. Forms of Community Engagement in Neighborhood Food Retail: Healthy Community Stores Case Study Project.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2022
    Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Ana P Martínez-DonateDepartment of Population Health Sciences, University of Wisconsin, Madison, WI, USA. martinezdona@wisc.edu.
Ann Josie RiggallDepartment of Population Health Sciences, University of Wisconsin, Madison, WI, USA. ajgolemb@gmail.com.
Amy M MeinenObesity Prevention Network, University of Wisconsin, Madison, WI, USA. ameinen@wisc.edu.
Kristen MaleckiDepartment of Population Health Sciences, University of Wisconsin, Madison, WI, USA. kmalecki@wisc.edu.
Anne L EscaronUniversity of California, Los Angeles, USA. aescaron@gmail.com.
Bev HallWaupaca County NuAct Coalition, Waupaca, WI, USA. Bev.Hall@co.waupaca.wi.us.
Anne MenziesWaupaca County NuAct Coalition, Waupaca, WI, USA. Anne.Menzies@thedacare.org.
Gary GarskePortage County Activity and Nutrition Coalition, Stevens Point, WI, USA. garskeg@co.portage.wi.us.
F Javier NietoDepartment of Population Health Sciences, University of Wisconsin, Madison, WI, USA. fjnieto@wisc.edu.
Susan NitzkeDepartment of Nutritional Sciences, University of Wisconsin, Madison, WI, USA. nitzke@nutrisci.wisc.edu.

Funding

INSTITUTIONAL CTSA (UW-MADISON): CLINICAL TRIALSUL1RR025011 · NCRR · UNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN-MADISON · PI DREZNER, MARC KENNETH · 2007 to 2011
$29.5M
Novel population health approach to address CVD and pulmonary health disparitiesRC2HL101468 · NHLBI · UNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN-MADISON · PI NIETO, F. JAVIER · 2009 to 2010
$5.3M
NCRR NIH HHS 5UL 1RR025011NHLBI NIH HHS 1 RC2 HL101468NHLBI NIH HHS RC2 HL101468
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundResearch suggests that the food environment influences individual eating practices. To date, little is known about effective interventions to improve the food environment of restaurants and food stores and promote healthy eating in rural communities. We tested "Waupaca Eating Smart " (WES), a pilot intervention to improve the food environment and promote healthy eating in restaurants and supermarkets of a rural community. WES focused on labeling, promoting, and increasing the availability of healthy foods.

methodsWe conducted a randomized community trial, with two Midwestern U.S. communities randomly assigned to serve as intervention or control site. We collected process and outcome data using baseline and posttest owner and customer surveys and direct observation methods. The RE-AIM framework was used to guide the evaluation and organize the results.

resultsSeven of nine restaurants and two of three food stores invited to participate in WES adopted the intervention. On a 0-4 scale, the average level of satisfaction with WES was 3.14 (SD=0.69) for restaurant managers and 3 (SD=0.0) for store managers. On average, 6.3 (SD=1.1) out of 10 possible intervention activities were implemented in restaurants and 9.0 (SD=0.0) out of 12 possible activities were implemented in food stores. One month after the end of the pilot implementation period, 5.4 (SD=1.6) and 7.5 (SD=0.7) activities were still in place at restaurants and food stores, respectively. The intervention reached 60% of customers in participating food outlets. Restaurant food environment scores improved from 13.4 to 24.1 (p < 0.01) in the intervention community and did not change significantly in the control community. Food environment scores decreased slightly in both communities. No or minimal changes in customer behaviors were observed after a 10-month implementation period.

conclusionThe intervention achieved high levels of reach, adoption, implementation, and maintenance, suggesting the feasibility and acceptability of restaurant-and food store-based interventions in rural communities. Pilot outcome data indicated very modest levels of effectiveness, but additional research adequately powered to test the impact of this intervention on food environment scores and customer behaviors needs to be conducted in order to identify its potential to promote healthy eating in rural community settings.

Indexed as

Feeding BehaviorFood IndustryHealth PromotionRestaurantsAdultAgedFeasibility StudiesFemaleFood LabelingFood SupplyHumansMaleMiddle AgedMidwestern United StatesPilot ProjectsResidence Characteristics

Identifiers

PMID25885704
PMCPMC4331304

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.